rn Digital
drives. The failure rates are *horrible*. I've also heard many good things
about the recent IBM drives.
Simon Karpen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Fixing Unix is easier than living with NT."
--Larry McVoy
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAIL
Which WD drives have you had good luck with?
I have yet to see a recent one last more than a year...
--Simon
On 10 Oct 1997, John Goerzen wrote:
> I've had nothing but good luck with Seagate and Western Digital.
> Conner, I agree has horrible problems.
>
> Simon Karpen
a Conner IDE that's OK too. My new 2.1GB
> laptop drive is a Seagate, and that works fine so far.
>
Simon Karpen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Those that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."
some more ammo if anybody needs info to convince people of windows nt's
instability and not being suitable for tasks where reliability is
important...
Simon Karpen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Those that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safet
Alright, after being flamed to a crisp...
I realize I shoudln't have sent that message to the list, perhaps
a brief snip and a pointer to it at most would have been appropriate.
I'm sorry for the wasted bandwidth; it won't happen again.
Simon Karpen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've had extremely good luck with the Kingston Tulip based cards.
They're fairly cheap ($50 or so for 10mb, $90 or so for 100mb),
and i've found them to be very fast, reliable, and well-supported
by Linux.
The 10mb card is a combo card (aui, utp, coax all on one card).
Simon Ka
6 matches
Mail list logo
