subscribe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
kernel config". But I've looked and looked - and can't find anywhere
in "make menuconfig" where a framebuffer console is even mentioned.
Can anyone help me out here ?
Cheers
Nick Boyce
Bristol, UK
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voodoo 3 one. I'll have a
play with this.
BTW: I'm slightly surprised that an "experimental" feature is enabled in
the default Debian release boot-floppies kernel. I wonder how
experimental it is.
Thanks for the help.
Nick Boyce
Bristol, UK
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Compaq=Hewpaq as necessary) ?
I last saw one in a DEC Alphaserver 800.
I'm not at all sure you should expect it to work in an 1386 machine.
Nick Boyce
Bristol, UK
--
There is no spoon.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
he DNS ? Can you
ping any places you should be able to ? (Like the DNS servers themselves)
Nick Boyce
Bristol, UK
--
"Bother," said Pooh as he struggled with sendmail.cf.
"It never does quite what I want."
"I wish Christopher Robin were here.".
his is not good ...
I assume the "Debian keyring" contains the public keys of every Debian
developer there has ever been. Surely there is a release-signing key
that Debian uses, that could be posted separately for download ?
Cheers,
Nick Boyce
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
Stephen Cormier wrote:
> On March 13, 2007 11:04:44 pm Nick Boyce wrote:
>> Do I *really* need to add such a large keyring to my own keyring, just
>> to verify the dang GPG signature on a CD image ?
>
> Have you tried/heard of the --keyring option when using gpg? That way y
dial-up (yes .. some of
us still are) every 13Mb download is painful ... compared with the 2K
(say) that a separate release-signing key would take.
Is this 13Mb keyring also needed by the new package-signature-checking
apt-get ?
Okay - enough from me.
Cheers
Nick Boyce
--
To UNSUBSCRI
ain
a link to the required key.
>> Is this 13Mb keyring also needed by the new package-signature-checking
>> apt-get ?
>
> No, that's a much smaller package, only containing the key for the
> debian archive.
Thanks for your help.
Nick Boyce
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
t.org/article.pl?sid=06/11/12/2048219
BTW: the "decryptString" address bar trick doesn't work with Sarge's Konqueror
3.3.2 either :(
Nick Boyce
--
Will no one rid me of this troublesome chair ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
you to listen to so you can tell it's "normal" :)
These were quite elderly models - I'd love to hear how modern Thinkpads
compare on these points.
Cheers
Nick Boyce
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
st me, or others here as well.
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-kde/2007/01/msg00033.html
[2] http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92714
(It seems everyone else on debian-kde must be running Etch - or doesn't fit
one of the other criteria ... probably they just don't use KsCD.)
TIA f
cameras you mention, but I guess you must at least be
frame-grabbing. Sorry I didn't see your original post in time.
Good luck.
Cheers,
Nick Boyce
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://people.freebsd.org/~phk/dlink/
but I have to say D-Link doesn't sound exactly apologetic about it all.
If someone can point me to a D-Link statement making a proper apology
then I'll shut up ... :)
Until then, I urge you to consider boycotting D-Link products - even if
they _do_ work with
sk
partitions, and then mounting them by their labels, provides a nice
solution to the device order discovery & naming problem.
We are certainly going to have to find a good way round this sort of
silliness before Linux can be ready for the masses.
Good luck.
(And sorry if I'm completely off-target here)
Nick Boyce
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
this list and
many others can all too often seem like flames - especially to those
unversed in Netiquette for at least a decade ... "it's usually nothing
personal") ... or maybe he just hasn't got the time to participate in an
endless mailing list dialogue about a small topic (most of us who've
been here a while accept this as the price of asking for and receiving
help from volunteers).
Just my 2p - hope I haven't offended.
Cheers
Nick Boyce
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
d kernels to Etch during its lifecycle, specifically
to add support for new hardware ... yay :-)
[1] http://www.debian.org/News/weekly/2007/02/
See the section "Updates during the Etch Life Cycle".
Cheers
Nick Boyce
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Grok Mogger wrote:
> Nick Boyce wrote:
>
>> The latest Debian Weekly News [1] mentions there are already tentative
>> plans to add updated kernels to Etch during its lifecycle, specifically
>> to add support for new hardware ... yay :-)
>
> Very cool! Thanks for
just downloaded. If it's the 'Release' file which has a bad
signature, we should just sign it "inline" ("gpg -sa"), rather than with
a detached signature - then the file could not get out of step with its
signature. If we already do sign it inline then there is a signing
problem that may be serious. Er .. er ...
And what does "A70DAF536070D3A1" refer to ?
(Maybe this is a topic for debian-security - not sure)
Cheers,
Nick Boyce
--
Walk towards the light.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:
http://www.digikam.org/about.html
http://packages.debian.org/digikam
I haven't tried it (don't have a digital camera).
Nick Boyce
--
'If you don't pray in my school, I won't think in your church'
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 04:29:47AM +, Nick Boyce wrote:
Just wondering whether anyone here understands the cause of the "BADSIG"
error from "aptitude update"
[...]
Yes, I used to get this a lot with ftp.ro.debian.org. I switched to
using ftp.a
Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 04:29:47 +, Nick Boyce wrote:
Just wondering whether anyone here understands the cause of the "BADSIG"
error from "aptitude update"
[...]
The usual suggested causes involve Debian mirrors in an inconsistent
state wh
Nick Boyce wrote:
Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 04:29:47 +, Nick Boyce wrote:
Just wondering whether anyone here understands the cause of the "BADSIG"
error from "aptitude update"
[...]
I'm inclined to agree with you about our proxy having a cac
completed. This
is just a wild guess, and may be way off-target.
Now I think about it a bit more I realise aptitude almost certainly
*isn't* using wget ... the proxy specification is in apt.conf, not
.wgetrc. Must be own code
Cheers
Nick Boyce
--
Leave the Olympics in Greece, wh
ide emacs sessions, rarely
venturing out to the shell for anything.
"I'm sorry ... I'm sorry ... I'll go now" ;)
Obviously everyone has their own favourite.
Cheers,
Nick Boyce
--
Leave the Olympics in Greece, where they belong.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1). I can see the directories are
dated 28th.Oct, so it's probably still underway.
Can anyone confirm for me that it should be okay for us to repoint
sources.list to archive.d.o for a while, in order to apt-get anything we
need to install prior to our belated upgrade to Etch ?
Thanks,
Ni
s. keeling wrote:
Nick Boyce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Can anyone confirm for me that it should be okay for us to repoint
sources.list to archive.d.o for a while, in order to apt-get anything we
Why not just point it at a locally mounted DVD? Then, you'd be safe
from a direct stri
ls - just my 2p.
Cheers
Nick Boyce
--
Most people, I think, don't even know what a Rootkit is, so why should
they care about it?
-- Thomas Hesse, president of Sony-BMG's Global Digital Business,
commenting on XCP
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debi
ttention but it's not high on anybody's TODO list.
And is there a better list to post this to ? A check shows only
debian-dpkg(-bugs) or debian-qa(-packages) as being likely.
Any comments welcome.
Cheers,
Nick Boyce
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 02:24:15AM +0000, Nick Boyce wrote:
>
>> (Etch) aptitude's error handling [cough] falls short of optimum
>> behaviour. In particular it returns an exit status of zero in various
>> failure situations
[...]
>&g
Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 02:24:15AM +0000, Nick Boyce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
> heard to say:
>
>> Does anyone think another bug report is called for ?
>> It looks as though it's known that the error handling behaviour
>> needs attenti
On 16/09/2013 13:15, Dr. Jennifer Nussbaum wrote:
> Of course the computer hasnt crashed for the last four days now. I
> did run some of the tests suggested, and everything checks out OK.
>
> Theres no new hardware in the system, no new accessories. ... I dont
> think that I installed any new s
nge the password, you basically have to create a second encrypted
device with the new passphrase and copy your data over
Thanks in advance,
Nick Boyce
--
Never FDISK after midnight
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe&
On Monday 25 Jun 2012 09:16:23 Claudius Hubig wrote:
> Nick Boyce wrote:
>
> > The installer uses 'dm-crypt' to encrypt the drive, rather than the full
> > LUKS system - and 'dm-crypt' generates the encryption key directly from
> > the pass- phrase,
On Tuesday 26 Jun 2012 10:47:50 Claudius Hubig wrote:
> If you do luksAddKey, you’ll have to enter one of the old
> passphrases. After that, you can try unlocking the volume with the
> new passphrase. If that succeeds, you can use luksKillSlot to remove
> the first slot.
luksDelKey or luksKillSlo
On Wednesday 27 Jun 2012 00:30:20 Mark Panen wrote:
> When i reboot grub appears and then i get a message "Please wait
> loading" and then a whole lot of other sh!t.
I think you'd better tell us what some of that doodookaka actually says :)
> Knoppix does not pick up the 2TB drive so i can't edi
On Sat, 15 Jul 2017 13:45:13 +0900
Joel Rees wrote:
> Who can compete when Intel refuses to pay
> the price of making CPUs that are unsafe at
> progressively higher speeds?
Er .. s/unsafe/safe/ ???
But basically +1 to everything (else) you wrote.
Nick
--
Never FDISK after midnight
On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 18:31:48 +
Karol Augustin wrote:
> On 2018-03-19 12:58, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> > Hello and Listmaster/owner,
> >
> > I have send on "Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 07:17:40 -0400" a message
> > to the list and now I got already 2800 Spams on one go!
> >
> > The EMail responsa
On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 07:35:28 -0400
Carl Fink wrote:
> Anyone else seeing this?
>
> E: Failed to fetch
> http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/l/linux/linux-headers-3.16.0-4-amd64_3.16.36-1+deb8u2_amd64.deb
> Could not resolve 'security-cdn.debian.org
> It was apparently temporary. Worked
On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 04:49:15 -0600
Doug wrote:
> On 11/29/2016 03:23 PM, David Niklas wrote:
> > Every so often I see something very much like this on the debian
> > mailing list.
> > I want to know, do people really get a job this way?
> > Is this list really intended for these kinds of emails?
On Sat, 02 Sep 2017 18:21:07 +
Tom Browder wrote:
> I would especially appreciate other ideas for programming editors for
> novice programmers.
If you really want to have a *simple* non-GUI (i.e. terminal) screen-mode
editor available that novice programmers who are refugee users from Windo
On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 16:08:15 +1000
Erik Christiansen wrote:
> On 06.09.17 05:31, Nick Boyce wrote:
[...]
> > [Joe is] one of the first things I install on any Linux
> > or *BSD system.
>
> In my decades of leading software teams, one thing I did not do is ask
> "What
On Wed, 06 Sep 2017 16:19:03 +1000
Ben Finney wrote:
> Nick Boyce writes:
>
> > I don't want to provoke any religious war here, and sorry if I offend
> > anybody, but:
>
> That doesn't alter the fact that you've disparaged programs in terms
> that
On Sat, 9 Sep 2017 07:39:58 -0400
rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, September 08, 2017 07:59:40 PM David Wright wrote:
> > On Fri 08 Sep 2017 at 17:39:39 (-0400), rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > On Friday, September 08, 2017 05:13:31 PM David Wright wrote:
> > > > Meanwhile, I have firefox op
On Tue, 12 Sep 2017 10:57:38 -0400
Whit Hansell wrote:
> For grins, I tried restarting Firefox w/o plugins. Then went to
> youtube and tried a video. Worked perfectly. So knew it was a plug-in.
> Turned out to be "You tube flashplayer - html5." disabled it and
> Voila' it worked.
Thank
' of
the explicitly-installed top-level package would also remove the
dependency packages because apt now knew the packages were no longer
needed. It kept cruft out of the system.
Has that specific functionality been rolled back into apt-get ?
Cheers,
Nick Boyce
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
erd by Cellejar lookin on:
>
> http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-faq/ch-pkgtools.en.html
er [cough] ... all 123 lines of the original quoted, as context for 7
lines of added value .
V poor signal to noise ratio - please don't do that.
Cheers
Nick Boyce
--
Goto, n.:
A p
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> In <4b29bdbe.2090...@glimmer.adsl24.co.uk>, Nick Boyce wrote:
>
>> The main advantage of aptitude over apt-get (IMO) used to be (sarge/etch
>> IIRC) that aptitude added extra info into the apt database flagging
>> packages that were
On 17/04/2010 01:03, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Camaleón put forth on 4/16/2010 8:31 AM:
>
>> It can be worst, though. There are manufacturers that paint all the RAM
>> slots in black or using the same color and so forcing us to read the
>> manual >:-)
>
> The manufacturers have bastardized the col
3 (from du)
It's roughly right, but ~7 Kb is still missing.
Does anyone think the reserved space is indeed the explanation ?
I'd just like to know, before I go too much further with this
installation, that there isn't something horribly wrong
Perhaps there _is_ a bug after al
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 18:41:18 -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > On Fri, 31 Mar 2006 02:13:03 +0100
> > Nick Boyce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I've just done a fresh install of Sarge 3.1r1 on an 8Gb partition on
> > > an i386 machine
between the original 340Mb and 830Mb. Still, it
looks like /proc (and /sys and /dev) must have been the cause of the
discrepancy - thanks very much.
Nick Boyce
Bristol, UK
--
You are in a maze of twisty political parties, all alike.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
52 matches
Mail list logo