On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 01:36 -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 09:24:03AM +0100, michael wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 14:39 -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 09:30:56PM +0100, michael wrote:
> > > > On
On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 11:36 +0100, michael wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 01:36 -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 09:24:03AM +0100, michael wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 14:39 -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Ma
On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 13:45 +0200, steef wrote:
> michael wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 11:36 +0100, michael wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 01:36 -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 09:24:03AM +01
On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 13:23 +0100, michael wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 13:45 +0200, steef wrote:
> > michael wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 11:36 +0100, michael wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 01:36 -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>
eo
> 但我們照他的應許、 盼望新天新地，有義居在其中。(彼後3:13)
> But in keeping with his promise we are looking forward to
> new heaven and a new earth, the home of righteousness. (2 Peter 3:13)
> ----- Original Message -
> From: "michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Newsgroups: linux.debia
On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 12:01 +0200, nicals wahlgren wrote:
> Normally I am using one sata disk, no problem to boot from it. (using
> amd64 and sid, kernel 2.6.21.2-amd64)
> But when I add another sata or ide disk from old Debian systems the
> system ends up in initramfs.
> BIOS still says it boots
Hello,
Having trouble getting my SATA WD raptor 150G drive smart enabled.
I'm pretty sure that Western Digital drives have smart support?
Thanks for any advice,
Mike
# smartctl -i /dev/sda
smartctl version 5.36 [x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu] Copyright (C) 2002-6
Bruce Allen
Home page is http://s
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
Having trouble getting my SATA WD raptor 150G drive smart enabled.
I'm pretty sure that Western Digital drives have smart support?
Thanks for any advice,
Mike
# smartctl -i /dev/sda
Google is friend.
I was missing the "-d ata" part in the command.
# smartc
On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 06:08 -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> michael wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 11:28 -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> >> michael wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 16:36 +0200, Pol Hallen wrote:
> >>>>> I've tried unsu
Quoting Tony Heal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Does anyone know what function/package does the prompting for
replacing configuration files during an upgrade? Any one
know how to automate the answers. Here is an example
Configuration file `/etc/exim4/conf.d/auth/30_exim4-config_examples'
==> Dele
Quoting Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I have seen this several times in the past, still having no idea how
this happens. For a while I suspected bash_completion but I think I
saw this also without bash_completion. Finally I am suspecting the
filesystem journaling doing weird thin
Quoting Peter Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Dear all,
I am having some difficulties installing Debian onto my new machine.
The hardware is:
1)CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo, 2.40 GHz, L2 Cache 4096 kB
2)Board: Intel Desktop Board DG965WH
3)DVD Recorder: ASUS Lightscribe Drive DRW-1814BL
and some oth
Quoting Peter Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
where can I get a Debian installer with a 2.6.20/21 kernel then? I
havent seen anything more recent than the testing install CD?
I would have thought that the latest "testing" installer would have
the 2.6.21 kernel, if not, try unstable.
Other
w if you need any further information.
Thanks, Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 2007-07-28 at 14:47 +0100, Wackojacko wrote:
> michael wrote:
> > Folks, I've a new machine
>
> Its likely that the machine has more bearing on this problem than the
> CDROM itself. We need more information regarding the Motherboard and in
> particular the
On Sat, 2007-07-28 at 15:55 +0100, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
> michael wrote:
> > Folks, I've a new machine with a "writemaster" CDROM drive. When trying
> > to install Debian 4.0 from iso image burnt to CD, it initially
> > recognises the CD and starts the
On Sat, 2007-07-28 at 14:47 +0100, Wackojacko wrote:
> michael wrote:
> > Folks, I've a new machine
>
> Its likely that the machine has more bearing on this problem than the
> CDROM itself. We need more information regarding the Motherboard and in
> particular the
On Sat, 2007-07-28 at 14:47 +0100, Wackojacko wrote:
> michael wrote:
> > Folks, I've a new machine
>
> Its likely that the machine has more bearing on this problem than the
> CDROM itself. We need more information regarding the Motherboard and in
> particular the
On Sat, 2007-07-28 at 18:03 +0100, Wackojacko wrote:
> michael wrote:
>
>
> > iTCO_wdt 20625 0
> > iTCO_vendor_support12741 1 iTCO_wdt
> > snd_page_alloc 19025 2 snd_hda_intel,snd_pcm
> > i2c_core 35777 1 i2c_i801
&g
On Sat, 2007-07-28 at 18:01 +0100, michael wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-07-28 at 14:47 +0100, Wackojacko wrote:
> > michael wrote:
> > > Folks, I've a new machine
> >
> > Its likely that the machine has more bearing on this problem than the
> > CDROM itself
s all the relevant info...). I also note that Debian
fails to detect the (on-board) Ethernet connections. Perhaps it is as
W-J suggested and this mobo is too modern (not sure where to check this)
any ideas? I've tried all I can think of and Googled endlessly...
Thanks
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 07:41 -0700, Alan Ianson wrote:
> On Mon July 30 2007 07:10, michael wrote:
> > Folks, I've a new machine with a "writemaster" CDROM drive. When trying
> > to install Debian 4.0 from iso image burnt to CD, it initially
> > recognises th
hronization [CPU#0 -> CPU#1]: passed.
Brought up 2 CPUs
Thanks, Michael
Quote:
Motherboard Micro ATX - DQ965GFEKR [BOAMOT-241]
- Support for an Intel® Core 2 Duo processor in an LGA775 socket with a
1066 or 800 MHz system bus
- Four 240-pin DDR2 SDRAM Dual Inline Memory Module (DIMM) sockets
-
On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 09:18 -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 09:27:33AM +0100, michael wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 07:41 -0700, Alan Ianson wrote:
> > > On Mon July 30 2007 07:10, michael wrote:
> > > > Folks, I've a new machi
Quoting "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I am installing two servers, each with 16GB of RAM, two quad-core Xeon
processors, and a SATA hard drive. The machines will be compute
servers, meaning lots of concurrently logged in users, each running
an assortment of jobs, and various long-run
Quoting Sergio Belkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi I was reading http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/index.html and was amazed
because XFS powerful features. But I'd like opinions if xfs should be a good
alternative to ext3 in typical cases, or if it should be relegated to
critical missions servers.
X
Quoting Sebastian Flothow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
I'm getting massive filesystem corruption on an md RAID comprising 4
SATA disks. I tried ext3, xfs and reiserfs on RAID level 5 as well as
ext3 on RAID level 1 (using only 2 disks); all can be crashed reliably
by running bonnie++ for just a few
On Sun, 2007-08-05 at 11:53 -0400, Tong Sun wrote:
> Package: less
> Version: 394-4
> Severity: wishlist
>
> I remember that I used to be able to exit 'less' by command key 'x' or
> something so that the content just viewed is left on screen, instead of
> being cleared and restored to the screen b
Copying the same file to the notebook's internal drive via samba works
fine, and then copying the file from the notebook's drive to the
external drive (i.e. no samba) works fine.
Any ideas?
Would be interested to see if sharing the drive via netatalk makes
a difference. Have you tried this?
I have just replaced my USB modem with a router/modem and things seem to
be working find on my Debian box behind the router, except for nslookup.
Is there something I need to amend to get it to work. Note I can still
access the e-World from my Debian box:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ping www.bbc.co.uk
PI
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 14:22 +0200, Martin Marcher wrote:
> On 8/16/07, michael bane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm trying to reduce a logical vol so that I can remove a HD from it.
> > However, I get errors with pvmove but I don't know why:
> >
&g
On 16 Aug 2007, at 14:12, Samuel Bächler wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ less /etc/resolv.conf
search
nameserver 158.152.1.58
nameserver 158.152.1.42
In Switzerland I would say "the dog is buried here" (how to
say in English?):
I entered your nameserver in my resolv.conf and it did not work.
For
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 15:08 +0100, Liam O'Toole wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 13:47:30 +0100
> michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I have just replaced my USB modem with a router/modem and things seem
> > to be working find on my Debian box behind the router, e
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 15:40 +0100, michael wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 15:08 +0100, Liam O'Toole wrote:
> > On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 13:47:30 +0100
> > michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I have just replaced my USB modem with a router/modem and t
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 08:48 -0800, Ken Irving wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 04:15:45PM +0100, michael wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 15:40 +0100, michael wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 15:08 +0100, Liam O'Toole wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 13:
On 16 Aug 2007, at 18:08, Vesa-Pekka Palmu wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, michael wrote:
I'm trying to reduce a logical vol so that I can remove a HD from it.
However, I get errors with pvmove but I don't know why. I saw some
old
postings with a kernel patch but the URL is ext
I suspect it may be a Fedora kernel
issue rather than anything more general
Michael Bane
Univ of Manchester, UK
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 09:49 +0200, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
> michael wrote:
> [...]
> >>>>>> I have just replaced my USB modem with a router/modem and things seem
> >>>>>> to be working find on my Debian box behind the router, except for
> >
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 13:17 -0400, Wayne Topa wrote:
> michael([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> > On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 15:40 +0100, michael wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 15:08 +0100, Liam O'Toole wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 13:
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 01:31 +0100, Jamin Davis wrote:
> Samuel Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ less /etc/resolv.conf
> >> search
> >> nameserver 158.152.1.58
> >> nameserver 158.152.1.42
> >
> > In Switzerland I would say "the dog is buried here" (how to
> > say in
Hi,
Since webmin has pulled out of the archives, are there any other similar
packages to webmin that give the same functionality, or are people using
non-official debian mirrors to download webmin for installation?
Thanks,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Quoting Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mike,
I just grab the .deb from the webmin site and use dpkg -i to install it.
Thanks! I will try that.
Do you ever worry about security updates and such?
or do you just keep a close eye on the webmin site an
Quoting Mike Bird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Monday 20 August 2007 16:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi Mike,
> I just grab the .deb from the webmin site and use dpkg -i to install it.
Thanks! I will try that.
D
Quoting Neil Gunton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
(First of all, I apologise if anyone sees this twice - I first posted
to the AMD64 list, but then thought that the more general debian users
list might get a broader response)...
I'm curious as to whether anyone has experience of software RAID in
Linux g
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Quoting Marcelo Chiapparini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi!
I need to install etch in a notebook which has MS-Vista installed. I
have shrinked the HD (using diskpart from inside Vista) in order to get
room for etch. I am using the etch netinstall cd, and the gui-expert
mod
On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 12:03:49 -0700, Chris Purves wrote
> I am seeing different results from /etc/cron.daily/find and running
> updatedb from the command line:
>
> aims-07:~# /etc/cron.daily/find
> aims-07:~# locate Access.pm
> aims-07:~# updatedb
> aims-07:~# locate Access.pm
> /home/httpd/twiki/l
have the latest but unsure how to tell)?
I'm currently using 'speedtouchconf-2.0_16_Oct-2005' (Steve Parker)...
Thanks, Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
lace all the spaces with newlines, then grep
> for
> the line before "Processor".
>
Okay, I mis-described my problem. It may have any number (>0) of spaces
between the fields eg
blah bals 38 Pro
cessor
or
bnd c cds sd dcs sd 38
Processor
ta, Michael
PS: ta fo
I guess a complete rephrase is best.
What I want is "how many processors does each WAITING job in lsf queues
require?". From 'bhist' I get outputs such as below (see whitespace
anywhere in "num Processors") and cannot determine a sure way of always
parsing it
e
usr/share/emacs/21.4/lisp/progmodes/f90.el with the /tmp/f90.el?
Thanks, Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
but it seems not). Do you know of the correct lisp package/command that
does this?
Many thanks, Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 23:02 +0100, Romain Francoise wrote:
> michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I have a distant memory of editting Fortran codes and being able to
> > jump from an IF to the next corresponding ELSE or END IF. (I thought
> > f90-next-block
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 15:44:38 +0100, Johannes Wiedersich wrote
> Preparing to buy a new server...
>
> What is debian's opinion about hardware/software raid?
>
> I have the feeling that software raid 1 is more reliable since if
> anything goes wrong with the hardware, I could just take one or two
>
On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 09:36 -0900, Ken Irving wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 02:32:37PM +0000, michael wrote:
> > I guess a complete rephrase is best.
> >
> > What I want is "how many processors does each WAITING job in lsf queues
> > require?". From &#x
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 04:55 -0800, JP wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I have recently started to use evolution as my mail client. However, I
> can't figure out how to make it work with spamassassin to detect the
> tons of junk mail I get every day. I have come across several posts to
> ubuntu/debian/gentoo
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 09:54 -0800, JP wrote:
> michael wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 04:55 -0800, JP wrote:
> > > Hi there,
> > >
> > > I have recently started to use evolution as my mail client. However, I
> > > can't figure out how to ma
Hello,
I wondering if I can assign a specific IP to a machine based
on its name?
I realize this can be done with hardware ethernet address, but
I would prefer to use client-hostname if its even possible.
A regular machine connecting to the dhcp3 server will add an entry to
the dhcpd.leases file,
On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 12:25:40 +0100, Andrea Ganduglia wrote
>
> In some way /dev/sda1 and /dev/sdb1 lost information about --add
> option after any reboot. :-(
After you add your partition,
how does mdadm --detail --scan compare to /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf ?
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
I'm not sure if I'm messed up here but all advice welcome:
I
used the WinXP setup CD to delete existing WinXP 32Gb partition,
created
2 new 16Gb partitions, then made some spare space at end a new
partition
too (it may have been 2 new partitions). WinXP installed okay into one
of the pa
On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 15:14 +0100, Jakub Narojczyk wrote:
> michael napisał(a):
>
> >I'm not sure if I'm messed up here but all advice welcome:
> >
> > I
> > used the WinXP setup CD to delete existing WinXP 32Gb partition,
> > created
> >
On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 14:38 +, michael wrote:
> I've not found 'fdisk' for Sarge/stable - is it better in anyway than
> parted, gpart?
Sorry - got confused there: apt-cache didn't show fdisk but I do have it
installed (from util-linux)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 15:14 +0100, Jakub Narojczyk wrote:
> michael napisał(a):
>
> >I'm not sure if I'm messed up here but all advice welcome:
> >
> > I
> > used the WinXP setup CD to delete existing WinXP 32Gb partition,
> > created
> >
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 08:56:39 +0100, Andrea Ganduglia wrote
>
> pro:~# mdadm --detail --scan
> ARRAY /dev/md1 level=raid5 num-devices=5 spares=1
> UUID=04a39ca8:0f07922a:5eb2e3a1:851b13b9
>devices=/dev/sda2,/dev/sdf2,/dev/sdd2,/dev/sdc2,/dev/sde2,
> /dev/sdb2
> ARRAY /dev/md0 level=raid1 num-d
> I'm not sure if I'm messed up here but all advice welcome:
>
> I
> used the WinXP setup CD to delete existing WinXP 32Gb partition,
> created
> 2 new 16Gb partitions, then made some spare space at end a new
> partition
> too (it may have been 2 new partitions). WinXP installed okay into one
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 06:38:30PM -0000, michael wrote:
>> > I'm not sure if I'm messed up here but all advice welcome:
>> >
>> > I
>> > used the WinXP setup CD to delete existing WinXP 32Gb partition,
>> > created
>> &
On 18 Dec 2006 11:24:55 -0800, schmity wrote
> Ok I have my debian machine connected to a XP machine through a router.
> I have made several attemps to install samba using apt-get and I
> have modified the smb.conf on several occations. My first thought
> was to start with a fresh reinstall of
On Wed, 03 Jan 2007 17:50:40 -0300, Alejandro wrote
> People, I have generated the key pair RSA from my root linux's user and
> then I copy my RSA public key to /root/.ssh/authorized_keys from the
> linux ssh server. After that I edit the sshd_config file and put permit
> rootlogin no and the corre
] but (a) I did have some DNS problems just prior to the last
received email and (b) switched off the box and physically moved it to a
new location (and the new IP number) just after the last received email.
I'm unsure how to go about debugging this so all pointers welcome!
Thanks, Michael
[1
On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 09:27 -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 02:12:42PM +0100, michael wrote:
> > I'm feeling a bit dense today so any help welcome!
> >
> > Essentially, I've just noticed that local mail hasn't been delivered for
>
On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 10:20 -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 02:49:56PM +0100, michael wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 09:27 -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 02:12:42PM +0100, michael wrote:
> > > > I'm fe
On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 11:05 -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 03:47:31PM +0100, michael wrote:
>
> > I see. I get no output doing that:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo mailq
> > Password:
> >
>
> All right. Exim4 doesn
On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 11:59 -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 04:26:49PM +0100, michael wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 11:05 -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 03:47:31PM +0100, michael wrote:
>
> > here's th
On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 11:59 -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 04:26:49PM +0100, michael wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 11:05 -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 03:47:31PM +0100, michael wrote:
>
> > here's th
On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 20:05 +0100, michael wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 11:59 -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 04:26:49PM +0100, michael wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 11:05 -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Sep 03, 200
Hello,
I have an sda (seagate ST3320620NS) drive that is split into a few
paritions, of which,
all are configured into corresponding raid 0 arrays via mdadm.
Below is the output of:
# smartctl -A -d ata /dev/sda
smartctl version 5.36 [x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu] Copyright (C) 2002-6
Bruce Al
I've been puzzling over this for a while and not come up with a solution
so perhaps an OpenOffice expert here might know? Essentially, I wish OO
Calc to have a cell whose contents reflect the time the file was last
saved.
Cheers, M
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject o
Quoting Mark Copper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 09:46:47AM -0700, tabris wrote:
Mark Copper wrote:
> Dear Users,
>
> I have an Intel machine on which I installed software RAID 1 using a
> Knoppix trick back in January of last year:
>
> # uname -a
> Linux deneb 2.6.15 #1 SMP PRE
Hello,
I not quite understanding the traffic lines with nload. Below
is my public ip of my firewall server. It looks smooth and constant.
About 200 computers surfing the web.
Device eth3 [1.2.3.4] (1/1):
===
Incoming:
|| ... .
es that Debian can see my card. After Googling a
little bit I got to
http://www.linuxquestions.org/hcl/showproduct.php?product=482, where I
learned that this card uses module `8139too'. But it seems like it is
already loaded, as indicated the output output of `lsmod':
`
ntbkmichael:/home/mic
Something I upgraded this w/end appeared to cause GNOME or xorg (X?)
to hang frequently so I attempted a new install of GNOME and all was
going well until the below which I can't work out how to progress
past - all ideas welcome. Thanks, Michael
Script started on Mon 24 Sep 2007 19:
On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 22:45 +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 15:06:02 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On 09/24/07 14:15, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> > [snip]
> > >
> > > The first Gnome 2.20 packages have entered unstable; the current mix of
> > > version 2.18 and 2.20 does not see
On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 14:31 -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 10:27:17PM +0100, michael wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 22:45 +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 15:06:02 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > > On 09/24/
On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 17:33 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 09/24/07 17:18, michael wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 14:31 -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> >> On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 10:27:17PM +0100, michael wrot
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 10:43 +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 23:18:50 +0100, michael wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 14:31 -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 10:27:17PM +0100, michael wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2007
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 11:36 +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 10:06:09 +0100, michael wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 10:43 +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 23:18:50 +0100, michael wrote:
>
> [ snip: problems inst
Quoting Simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi There,
We are trying to install debian etch onto our Inspiron 530 that has a
SATA DVD drive, but the installer cannot detect the CD drive once it
is booted. How do i move forward here?
Sounds like etch doesn't have the drivers for your sata controller.
e
Quoting Simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Thanks for that... have downloaded the lastest snapshot and it booted
no issues. Now it wont find the network card. sigh... its a intel
e1000 i think.
Is it easier to just put a new network card in it?
Could be,
An old 3com or something may help, but I woul
d write it?!)
it says 13:01).
I've tried variants of
LC_TIME=en_GB.UTF-8 /usr/bin/evolution
but with no joy. Anybody out there had more luck on this?
Thanks, Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quoting Michael Acklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello all. I am very new at what I am attempting to do. I have run
Debian in the past and just recently installed it on a new built system
that I am setting up. So please take it easy on the Newbie.
First I built the system with the ASUS Mothe
Folks, maybe I'm doing something wrong but I seem unable to get an
annotated output from gprof nor info on which line/s are taking the
time. Any suggestions? Thanks, Michael
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Fortran$ uname -a
Linux ratty.phy.umist.ac.uk 2.6.18-4-686 #1 SMP Wed May 9 23:03:12 UTC
2007
Hi,
I created raid 5 array via the following:
# mdadm -C /dev/md_d0 -l5 -n 6 /dev/sd[a-f]3 --auto=p
Upon reboot, I cfdisk'd the md_d0 into md_d0p1 and md_d0p2
Formatted each partition and mounted one to /mnt and the other to /mnt2.
Running some bonnie++ benchmarks gave extra slow write results
Hi,
I created raid 5 array via the following:
# mdadm -C /dev/md_d0 -l5 -n 6 /dev/sd[a-f]3 --auto=p
Upon reboot, I cfdisk'd the md_d0 into md_d0p1 and md_d0p2
Formatted each partition and mounted one to /mnt and the other to /mnt2.
Running some bonnie++ benchmarks gave extra slow write results
Quoting "Douglas A. Tutty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Well, its raid5 which is slow to begin with. Have you verified with
mdadm that the array is complete and not running in degraded mode (which
would slow it down further)?
Tell us about sd[a-f]. What are they and how are they connected to the
com
Quoting "Douglas A. Tutty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Well, its raid5 which is slow to begin with. Have you verified with
mdadm that the array is complete and not running in degraded mode (which
would slow it down further)?
Sorry, forgot to mention that I have check mdstat to make sure the
arra
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
host:~# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid1] [raid10] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
md_d0 : active raid5 sdd3[3] sdc3[2] sdb3[1] sda3[0]
14650944 blocks level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [4/4] []
md1 : active raid10 sda2[0] sdd2[3] sdc2[2] sdb2[1]
976729
Adding some more info:
I killed my raid 5 and created a raid 0 instead. After creating the
single raid 0 array, I partitioned it into 2 parititions. Formatted
and mounted both and ran the same speed tests. Both tests turned out
normal.
Then, I killed the raid 0 and instead created 2 raid 5
Quoting Martin Marcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
2007/10/9, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Adding some more info:
Interesting results.
I wonder if anyone else has a partitioned raid 5 array and have normal
speed results?
I do.
Well sort of. I don't partition RAIDs but I put LVM on to
Quoting martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
also sprach [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.10.09.0611 +0100]:
So, as far as I can tell, I only see the slow down on the first
partition of a partitioned single raid 5 array. (Didn't test raid
1 or raid 10)
Can you try a third partition
I 'disable'd an account (using right click menu) but now when I try to
re-enable it using edit-preferences menu the whole app crashes with:
SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault)
at the point of selecting 'preferences'. Details of setup below.
Anybody else seen this? Ta, M
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache p
On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 22:02 +0200, Robert Cates wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> just a general question - I'm interested in getting a motherboard that
> supports 4 of the new AMD Quad Core CPUs. That would be effectively 16
> CPUs. My question is, with the 2.6.18-5-686 kernel from etch, will the
> SMP ker
201 - 300 of 7436 matches
Mail list logo
