swapper tainted

2013-09-17 Thread Jim Green
This happens in hibernation. 6143 Sep 16 00:34:30 antec kernel: [28317.484624] ACPI: Waking up from system sleep state S4 6144 Sep 16 00:34:30 antec kernel: [28317.536857] PM: noirq restore of devices complete after 51.993 msecs 6145 Sep 16 00:34:30 antec kernel: [28317.536892] irq event 55: bogus

Re: swapper tainted

2013-09-17 Thread Jim Green
On 17 September 2013 18:58, emmanuel segura wrote: > Read this link http://www.novell.com/support/kb/doc.php?id=3582750 > Read it. It must be, How to tell which driver caused the taint?

Re: swapper tainted

2013-09-17 Thread Jim Green
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 08:10:26PM -0500, Mark Allums wrote: > If you are using the proprietary Nvidia driver, that's it. I do I am using 304.88 from wheezy repository.. How could I fix it? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl

Re: swapper tainted

2013-09-19 Thread Jim Green
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 10:51:35AM +0100, Darac Marjal wrote: > Just before the error is the complaint > > irq event 55: bogus return value ff94 > > What device have you got on IRQ 55? (Try "grep 55: /proc/interrupts" to grep 55: /proc/interrupts 55: 1 0 0

Re: swapper tainted

2013-09-20 Thread Jim Green
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 08:58:55AM +0200, emmanuel segura wrote: > lspci -vv 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 2nd Generation Core Processor Family DRAM Controller (rev 09) Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. P8P67 Deluxe Motherboard Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemW

Re: swapper tainted

2013-09-20 Thread Jim Green
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 11:49:32AM +0400, recovery...@gmail.com wrote: > Judging from xchi_hcd, it's a USB 3.0 hub. Try unloading this module > on suspend, and loading it at resume. > > Or, try this: > > http://www.pcl-developers.org/xhci-hcd-I-hate-you-USB-3-0-and-Primesense-Asus-Xtion-td5707949

kernel tainted

2013-09-25 Thread Jim Green
Sep 25 23:13:30 antec kernel: [12074.506735] sr0: CDROM not ready. Make sure there is a disc in the drive. Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.112791] irq 16: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option) Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.112795] Pid: 8085, comm: Socket Thread Tainte

Re: debian squeeze amd64 recent frequent crashes

2013-02-06 Thread Jim Green
On 6 February 2013 13:13, Kelly Clowers wrote: > On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Jim Green > wrote: >> my debian squeeze amd64 has served me well for past 2/3 years. I >> struggled a few days with recent frequent crashes and hope to get some >> help from the list. I alr

Re: debian squeeze amd64 recent frequent crashes

2013-02-06 Thread Jim Green
my set of old RAM fixed the issue. Shame on you Gskill. Thanks List! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CACAe89w1MHZpcxpO05P=q7K5YJn+fTW-hF8Oo4=19fd-etb

raid10 and lvm problem on new lenny install

2011-03-19 Thread Jim Green
this is what I have from fdisk -l, I have lvm on /dev/md1, md1 is a raid10 array with 4x2T drives. Disk /dev/md1: 4000.5 GB, 4000525058048 bytes 2 heads, 4 sectors/track, 976690688 cylinders Units = cylinders of 8 * 512 = 4096 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (mi

Re: raid10 and lvm problem on new lenny install

2011-03-19 Thread Jim Green
I already have Total PE 953799 this is bigger than 65k, does anyone know the current maximum number PE in debian lenny? Jim On 19 March 2011 22:15, Gregory Seidman wrote: > On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 10:02:24PM -0400, Jim Green wrote: >> this is what I have from fdisk -l, I h

Re: raid10 and lvm problem on new lenny install

2011-03-20 Thread Jim Green
On 20 March 2011 04:09, Jonathan Matthews wrote: > On 20 March 2011 02:24, Jim Green wrote: >> http://www.gagme.com/greg/linux/raid-lvm.php > > That looks like an LVM1 article. > > Here's a readable one about LVM2: > http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/l-lvm

best practice to use newer cpan modules on squeeze

2011-04-19 Thread Jim Green
Hello! in squeeze most perl modules are not up-to-date. for example libmoose-perl. In this case I include the sid repo and attempt to upgrade to sid version of libmoose but a hell of dependency begins. I am afraid if insist on upgrading this module, lots of perl core module/perl would be upgraded

sysctl vs kernel .config

2011-04-23 Thread Jim Green
Hello debianers: today i successfully compiled 2.38.4 kernel using make-kmkg and fixed the hibernate can't resume issue for kernel 2.38-2, got a couple questions here: first is run time and the latter is compile time, but what is the difference here, is one of the other's subset? do their paramete

single cable dual nic?

2011-04-24 Thread Jim Green
Hi: I have a asus p8p67 deluxe board and it has two nics and two ports, I am thinking of bonding them to one nic, but I only have one cable so will only use one port. Will this do much help to the throughput/speed? If I have two cables connecting to both ports I think it will definitely help, but h

Re: single cable dual nic?

2011-04-25 Thread Jim Green
On 25 April 2011 09:32, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Sun, 24 Apr 2011, Jim Green wrote: >> I have a asus p8p67 deluxe board and it has two nics and two ports, I >> am thinking of bonding them to one nic, but I only have one cable so >> will only use one port. Will

Re: best practice to use newer cpan modules on squeeze

2011-04-25 Thread Jim Green
On 20 April 2011 03:30, Alex Mestiashvili wrote: > On 04/20/2011 05:55 AM, Jim Green wrote: >> >> Hello! >> in squeeze most perl modules are not up-to-date. for example >> libmoose-perl. >> >> In this case I include the sid repo and attempt to upgrade to s

Re: single cable dual nic?

2011-04-25 Thread Jim Green
On 25 April 2011 13:19, Jim Green wrote: > On 25 April 2011 09:32, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: >> On Sun, 24 Apr 2011, Jim Green wrote: >>> I have a asus p8p67 deluxe board and it has two nics and two ports, I >>> am thinking of bonding them to one nic, b

where to get patched older kernel for example 2.6.39

2011-12-05 Thread Jim Green
Hello community: I use debian squeeze running 2.6.38.8-4. usually I download kernel source tree from kernel.org and strip stuff I don't need and compile my own kernel. but there is a problem, I think the older kernel such as 2.6.38 are not being patched on kernel.org. lets say there was a bug fix

Re: where to get patched older kernel for example 2.6.39

2011-12-05 Thread Jim Green
On 5 December 2011 23:43, Bob Proulx wrote: > Bob Proulx wrote: >> If you want to run the older series of kernel but with security >> patches applied then perhaps the best source would be a distro kernel >> such as the Debian Squeeze Linux kernel 2.6.39.  It contains all of > > Oops, 2.6.39 isn't

Re: where to get patched older kernel for example 2.6.39

2011-12-05 Thread Jim Green
On 6 December 2011 05:07, Bob Proulx wrote: > Do you have any examples of something in the Linux 3.x kernel that > isn't in the 2.6.38 kernel that is likely to cause trouble? Actually I don't :) I haven't got the chance to look through the long changelogs.. my other concern using the 3.** kernel

Re: where to get patched older kernel for example 2.6.39

2011-12-06 Thread Jim Green
On 6 December 2011 19:33, Arno Schuring wrote: > Jim Green (student.northwest...@gmail.com on 2011-12-06 05:17 +): >> On 6 December 2011 05:07, Bob Proulx wrote: >> > Do you have any examples of something in the Linux 3.x kernel that >> > isn't in the 2.6.3

system beep after upgrade to squeeze

2011-02-12 Thread Jim Green
Hello: I upgraded from lenny to squeeze, overall it was ok, but I still couldn't silence the system beep.. I already have blacklist pcspkr in /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist.conf this used to work in lenny, but stopped working in squeeze, thanks for any help! Jim. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb

Re: system beep after upgrade to squeeze

2011-02-12 Thread Jim Green
On 12 February 2011 13:22, Camaleón wrote: > On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 12:32:47 -0500, Jim Green wrote: > >> I upgraded from lenny to squeeze, overall it was ok, but I still >> couldn't silence the system beep.. > > (...) > > In GNOME, you can try by disabling it v

Re: system beep after upgrade to squeeze

2011-02-12 Thread Jim Green
On 12 February 2011 13:50, Camaleón wrote: > On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 13:32:56 -0500, Jim Green wrote: > >> On 12 February 2011 13:22, Camaleón wrote: > >>> In GNOME, you can try by disabling it via gconf editor: >>> >>> /apps/metacity/general/audible_bel

Re: system beep after upgrade to squeeze

2011-02-12 Thread Jim Green
On 12 February 2011 13:49, Tixy wrote: > On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 12:32 -0500, Jim Green wrote: >> Hello: >> I upgraded from lenny to squeeze, overall it was ok, but I still >> couldn't silence the system beep.. > > I had a beep problem in Squeeze recently and finally

Re: system beep after upgrade to squeeze

2011-02-12 Thread Jim Green
On 12 February 2011 14:03, Camaleón wrote: > On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 13:55:23 -0500, Jim Green wrote: > >> On 12 February 2011 13:50, Camaleón wrote: > >>>> I am using a different lightweight windows manager icewm...  I guess >>>> some modules changed na

Re: system beep after upgrade to squeeze

2011-02-12 Thread Jim Green
On 12 February 2011 15:08, Stephen Powell wrote: > On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 13:50:04 -0500 (EST), Camaleón wrote: >> >> On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 13:32:56 -0500, Jim Green wrote: >>> >>> I am using a different lightweight windows manager icewm...  I guess >>> some m

question about storage

2011-02-18 Thread Jim Green
Hello! I have a laptop with 120G harddrive, 2x320G external harddrive, I don't have a desktop. Now I am doing something serious storing some huge historical data to mysql database and want to have some better storage solution(I hate the two external harddrives I bought 4 years ago, need to power

Re: question about storage

2011-02-18 Thread Jim Green
rote: > On 02/19/2011 12:23 AM, David Christensen wrote: >> >> On 02/18/2011 08:36 PM, Jim Green wrote: >>> >>> I have a laptop with 120G harddrive, 2x320G external harddrive, I >>> don't have a desktop. >>> Now I am doing something serious s

Re: question about storage

2011-02-19 Thread Jim Green
> > Why 4*2TB drives?  Unless this is a MythTV server that's total overkill, > and more than you need to spend.  And then you have the 512/4096 sector > size mismatch issue if you go with WD's 2TB green drives which murders > performance.  I highly discourage use of the WD green drives. 2T drive i

Re: question about storage

2011-02-19 Thread Jim Green
> Just stay away from the WD Green drives, or any 512/4096 hybrid drives, > for your sake. :) Thanks! also lets say I am building a quad/hex core desktop box for computing. I'd like listen to ur advice about cpu and motherboard, I am not partial to intel but I do prefer a quiet and debian friendly

Re: question about storage

2011-02-19 Thread Jim Green
> IIRC, the OP said he's currently "storing some huge historical data to > mysql database" on a combination of his internal laptop drive and two > 320GB external USB drives.  Let's see, that's > > 320 + 320 + 250?? = 890 GB _IF_ they're full, which they probably > aren't, and he's probably holding