Hello everybody,
According to the man page for 'mount', 'umask=value' is used as follows:
"umask=value
Set the umask (the bitmask of the permissions that are not
present). The default is the umask of the current process. The
value is given in oc
>VFAT doesn't support unix-style file permissions. What you're seeing
>is a unix-style system trying to do the best it can on a crappy
>filesystem. It won't get any better than what you've got.
I know all that, but *why* permissions on some files cannot be set properly -
that is my initial quest
>I didn't see it yesterday, but it seems that is is always the write bit
>that does not get set properly. The umask values that work are only
>those that do /not/ allow writing to all files.
>
>Is it possible that the files have been marked "read-only" in Windows
>and that mount respects that sett
Hello everybody,
I have the following lines in ~/.bash_prompt (for all users):
--
# set prompt and window title (if running in X terminal)
case $TERM in
xterm*)
PS1="\[\033]0;\$\w/\007\]\$\w/: "
;;
Hello everybody,
I successfully compiled and instaled rekall 2.2.1 on Debian unstable (rekall is
a database front-end, similar to Microsoft's Access, see
http://www.rekallrevealed.org/), but the program is virtually unusable, since
it crashes with a segfault every couple of minutes when you try to
A month ago, I found a .deb for Rekall, version 2.2.0-beta4-2.
I can't seem to find the package again, but the maintainer listed
through apt-cache show is:
Maintainer: Edgar Jasper < develop at edgar dot org dot uk >
I can't say much about the program because I haven't used it
extensively. Hopefu
At risk of being shot at at sunrise, I had rekall working without any problems
in Gentoo a few days back. Does the following help you at all?
I don't think it is going to help - all the required dependencies are seemed to
be fully met, but nontheless the problem still exists.
Maybe gdb backtrace
Hi everyone,
I'm running debian testing ("bookworm" at the moment) and have firefox
88 installed from unstable. My sources.list contains testing and
unstable main, contrib and non-free lines and I have pinning set up to
900 testing, 500 unstable. Default-Release is set to "testing".
The debian pa
To my understanding, unstable has 91.0.1-1 and experimental has
91.0.1-2 as seen in https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/firefox.
t.
And that is still 88. Okay, thank you for explaining, I learned
something today :)
Am Sa., 4. Sept. 2021 um 15:02 Uhr schrieb Anssi Saari :
>
> "Daniel M." writes:
>
> > The debian package tracker (https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/firefox)
> > states that version 9
Hi all,
I am getting the strangest behavior from apt-get install. It yields
the following message:
dpkg: /build/buildd/dpkg-1.8.3.1/main/packages.c:191: process_queue:
Assertion `dependtry <= 4' failed.
One of those times I was also given instructions to try
dpkg --configure -a
but it yie
/debian/ squeeze-updates main
deb http://backports.debian.org/debian-backports squeeze-backports main
I have tried running apt-get clean and autoremove; no change.
--
Daniel M. Drucker, Ph.D.
d...@3e.org
Huh. I wonder how it got that way in the first place, then.
Thanks, that fixed it.
Daniel
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Dan Ritter wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 12:44:24PM -0400, Daniel M. Drucker wrote:
> > When I run apt-get update, I get:
> >
> > W: Fai
13 matches
Mail list logo
