ility issues for me lately (it has
a tendency to deadlock on its status database), but is otherwise good.
courier-imap is supposed to be very nice, although I've never used it
myself.
Dan
/\ /\
| Daniel Jacobowitz
in sync with the library, while the man pages are often years out
of date.
Dan
/--------\ /\
| Daniel Jacobowitz|__|SCS Class of 2002 |
| Debian GNU/Linux Developer__Carnegie Mellon University |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
\/ \/
Is there any reason that anyone would object if I changed the forward delete
key to do something sane, like delete forward, instead of toggling cloaking?
Replies just to me, please.
Dan
/\ /\
| Daniel Jacobowitz
it would fix the binary incompatibility problems that glibc is
> introducing in linux recently.
I'd think you could just do this with symlinks - the problem is that
you'd need to change the soname away from libc6, which is a whole world
of chaos.
Dan
/-
do not have ipv6
enabled until this is fixed.
Dan
/\ /----\
| Daniel Jacobowitz|__|SCS Class of 2002 |
| Debian GNU/Linux Developer__Carnegie Mellon University |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
\/ \/
27;somewhat' resolved, in both potato and unstable (I
-think-). The problem is that a lot of libraries are not good about
freeing memory when they expect the program to exit, and thus when they
restart they leak a bit.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Debian GNU/Linux Develop
sts. "apt-cache pkgnames | grep libc5" yields :
> libc5-dev
> libc5
> * netscape & communicator packages deleted *
>
> Why is ieeefp.h 486 specific ???
Because it is? It describes hardware options specific to the x86
series of processors, if I remember correctly. For s
by group src though. If the intent is to make group src be
> able to manage source code, perhaps policy should say that
> foo-src packages make files in /usr/src owned and writable by
> the group (and files in tarballs dropped there likewise?)
cally transition the configurations.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
gt;
> Or post to an appropriate forum such as debian-user.
FWIW - Jack, try 'rpm --nodeps --force'? I believe I ran into this a
few days ago.
But yes, file a bug report.
[Redirected to -user]
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 08:58:00AM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> I understand that the line must be drawn somewhere. However, I am
> concerned about Etch shipping with a 2.6.17 kernel because of Xen.
Please read further down, to where the next rc is expected to include
2.6.18.
--
but about irssi-scripts or so.
- After great urging, I've removed the messages I considered most
legitimately offensive from BitchX several weeks ago.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
s considered harmful because of this
> (http://lists.debian.org/debian-apache/2002/debian-apache-200202/msg7.html)).
>
> Please tell me if there's any interest (it would probably even be useful
> without mod_accel, since mod_ssl can make use of it too).
I'd like to see how you
13 matches
Mail list logo
