Help with libc6/libstdc++2.8

1998-12-12 Thread Charles Collicutt
Hi, I ran "apt-get upgrade" a while ago and now gcc won't work. I pinned it down to a problem with either libstdc++2.8 or libc6. So I tried to reinstall them both: libstdc++2.8 installed OK but libc6 won't install as it "conflicts with libstdc++" which I'm sure it's not supposed to... Someone sa

Re: libgtk-1.1 error

1998-12-12 Thread Charles Collicutt
On Fri, 11 Dec 1998, Adam Shand wrote: > badger(larry)> gxsnmp & > gxsnmp: error in loading shared libraries > libgtk-1.1.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory I thought that was just me, I get that too. Means I can't run balsa either :( -- Charles

Re: What's using my harddisk? or, how to silence my computer

1998-12-12 Thread Charles Collicutt
On Sat, 12 Dec 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > ps. go to sleep it is 4 in morning in the UK!(unless of course you work > nights then that would not be a good thing) Now we all know sleep is unnecessary and evil when you could be programming or reading newsgroups :) Uh-oh, completely irrelevant f

Re: Help with libc6/libstdc++2.8

1998-12-12 Thread Charles Collicutt
On Sat, 12 Dec 1998, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote: > On Sat, Dec 12, 1998 at 02:13:28 +0000, Charles Collicutt wrote: > > Any ideas anyone? > Yes. Make a habit out of reporting precise version numbers when you complain > about packages. Oh, sorry, it was late/early... > The c

Re: Help with libc6/libstdc++2.8

1998-12-14 Thread Charles Collicutt
On Sat, 12 Dec 1998, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote: > The combination of dpkg 1.4.0.31 (or newer), libc6 2.0.7u-7.1 (or newer), > libstdc++2.8 2.90.29-2 (or newer), libstdc++2.9 2.91.59-2 (or newer) should > be fine. Well I have libstdc++2.8 2.90.29-0.6 and libc6 2.0.7t-1 installed, however dselect sa

Xpm

1998-12-16 Thread Charles Collicutt
Hi, I just ran ./configure for xscreensaver and it said that Xpm was not installed - in /usr/X11R6/lib I have: libXpm.a libXpm.so libXpm.so.4 libXpm.so.4.7 Isn't this what I need? I

Re: Installing wmaker and libc6_2.0.7u-7.1

1998-12-17 Thread Charles Collicutt
On Wed, 16 Dec 1998, Phillip Deackes wrote: > What should I do? It's a dependency bug, install a later version of libstdc++2.8 then install the new libc6 package - the installation of the later version of libstc++ will probably fail during the configuration phase so you might need to reinstall it

Re: menus gone when upgrading WindowMaker

1998-12-17 Thread Charles Collicutt
On Wed, 16 Dec 1998, Max wrote: > Greetings! >I just upgraded to the latest version of WindowMaker in potato and > all of the menus except for Apps have disappeared. What happened? Is > this a known bug? Is there a workaround? I have no idea about the "known bug" bit but there's definitely

Re: WP 8 problem

1998-12-19 Thread Charles Collicutt
On Fri, 18 Dec 1998, Dave Swegen wrote: > all the extra bells and whistles go download bloaty-hog staroffice. I find it > rather amazing that people complain about something they paid nothing for. Paid nothing for?! We have per minute phone bills here - downloading something that big which turns o

Why?!

1998-12-20 Thread Charles Collicutt
Hi, Before I start I'd like to make clear that this is *not* a flame or a troll, I genuinely want to know the answer to my question as I would quite like to continue using linux. Could someone tell me why I'm using linux not Windows 95? I've been told that linux is much better and I believed

Re: Why?!

1998-12-21 Thread Charles Collicutt
Hi, Thanks to everyone that replied to my e-mail. I think my main problem is that I try to compile too many things that I could just get as an older, less optimised .deb file, also I started using linux at school where I wasn't root and so all the big things were managed for me and I got used to

Re: Why?!

1998-12-22 Thread Charles Collicutt
On Mon, 21 Dec 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > You say that you'd like to see more games (I assume in the caliber of Quake) > on Linux and that you are considering a career in game programming. I ask why > not Linux? Consider Quake - it's source is still hidden, but the binaries are > distributed.