Hey, folks!
I finally have a project in the wings that may actually pay $$$ for
me to deploy a real live debian based solution... that would be cool in many
ways and it would mean that I could finally have a debian environment on my
desktop with some hope of having time to contribu
I have made gcc 2.7.2.1 with objc multithreading support (snapshot 960906)
available via:
ftp://ftp.thoughtport.net/pub/debian/gcc_2.7.2.1-2_i386.deb
ftp://ftp.thoughtport.net/pub/debian/
It is a debianized package; ie-- it is designed to be installed under Debian
linux. The '-2' is simply be
I'd be happy to renumber it to whatever is acceptable to the community--
suggestions, anyone?
Does the gcc_2.7.2.1-2 package in incoming have the obj-c patches?
b.bum
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTE
I have had no problems with Donald Beckers [sp.] eepro100.c driver built
against the 2.0.18 sources. As well, I have also used a couple of different
Tulip based cards; the Cogent EM960 (which, btw, causes the system to lock up
under heavy load) and the SMC 21041 based card.
If you would like
After a kind pointer from Guy Maor, the gcc package is noow renumbered to
more closely follow the dpkg release policy for a third party maintainer.
I also compiled gdb_4.16 with the Objective-C support patches from NeXT.
As well, it appears that the _MIT_POSIX_THREADS included in debian work
Before we decide to either standardize on some particular package or roll
our own package, please PLEASE PLEASE look at Netinfo.
Netinfo is amazing. I commonly work with a WAN that includes machines [all
running Netinfo] in 10 cities with a four level Netinfo hierarchy. I can
configure an
Does anyone have multi-cast working under Debian linux? I tried building a
kernel with multicast enabled [including tunneling/routing] but subsequent
rebooting of the machine rendered the ethernet interface completely
inoperative.
I'm using an Intel EtherExpress Pro/100 card... but could u
I'm having absolutely no luck building a working multicast routing
capable kernel with the eepro100.c driver. The driver works beautifully in
a 'normal' kernel (in both cases, I'm actually dynamically loading the
eepro100 module at boot).
The machine boots fine; no
Yet another problem with libc5.4.7-- but only if we back out to the
previous stable version.
Specifically; the latest cpp and gcc packages [the ones on which I based
my objc-compatible gcc/cpp packages] REQUIRE libc5.4.7. So, backing out on
5.4.7 will likely require backing out to gcc 2.7
Jim asked about GnuStep; Well-- a complete set of GnuStep packages have been
built by Karl Sackett and are awaiting my work on gcc [an attempt to fix a
crasher in the optimizer that causes the base GnuStep library to NOT be built
with optimization-- UGH!] before release.
Now that I have an an
...
When I get a chance, I'll create a better configuration post if for
net.community.review.
b.bum
Begin forwarded message:
>From agent Thu Nov 14 02: 10:08 1996
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 1996 10:17:35 +0200 (IST)
From: "Marc A. Volovic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Bill Bumgarner <[E
Actually-- I thought it was appropriate for the devel list since it may
affect future development of debian at the user interface level.
Regardless, my followup is to debian-user only.
> There is no inter-application communication or awareness to speak of.
# This can be handelt via sockets,
[claws out]
[box on]
>I have to vent.
>
OK,
>I cannot believe that after HOW MANY years of development, X windows is
>still such a completely inconsistent and painful user interface.
>
# I think you forgot to include open, free, expandable, flexible, . . .
Free, yes.
Expandable--
rbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Core
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (X11; I; Linux 2.1.9 i586)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: X is painful + GPLed solution
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Bill Bumgarner wrote:
>
> # Have look at the kde
Hello!
I'm in need of a debian kernel compiled with the 21040 ethernet driver.
While being familiar with the overall installation and
configuration of Linux, I am woefully lacking in an understanding of how to
obtain a kernel compiled with a driver that does not appea
First, thanks to all who assisted me with the Tulip+2940 kernel-- as it
turns out, debian 1.1 ships with the tulip driver as a dynamically loadable
module... so, merely adding 'tulip' to /etc/modules fixes the lacking driver
problem!!! [though, tulip didn't work for me-- i had to use the *oth
It appears that the site hosting the AfterStep pages is down-- AfterStep
being the NeXTSTEP like window manager taken one step beyond bowman.
Anyway; anyone have a mirror of the site available? Or the source to the
latest version? Or a binary?
Also; is it relatively easy to create debian
Howdy!
I just picked up the LAN adapter mentioned in the subject; it
replaces a Cogent BusMaster 960 that sporadically locked up under heavy load
[ick!].
It works perfectly under my primary OS-- NEXTSTEP-- but I can't
find a driver that works for Linux. The driver
I'm still looking for a driver for the Intel EtherExpress Pro/10+. As I have a
Cogent EM960 that LIMPS along [frequently locking up the system under heavy
load], I am quite willing to cobble together a driver-- but know next to
nothing about enet drivers [yeah, I can almost hear the knowledgab
19 matches
Mail list logo
