Hi all,
I have a .deb package from HP (hp-health) that has this requirement, and
doesn't install because of it. It got damaged somehow during the last
dist-upgrade. I think I'd better re-install it.
I have both libc6:i386 and lib32gcc-s1 (on an AMD 64bit machine).
libc6-i686:i386 is tagged
Hi all,
I have a .deb package from HP (hp-health) that has this requirement, and
doesn't install because of it. It got damaged somehow during the last
dist-upgrade. I think I'd better re-install it.
I have both libc6:i386 and lib32gcc-s1 (on an AMD 64bit machine).
libc6-i686:i386 is tagged
On Fri 17/May/2019 17:52:02 +0200 rhkramer wrote:
> On Friday, May 17, 2019 03:28:51 AM Dominik George wrote:
>> >> please do*never* use GitHub for free software
>> >
>> >Please explain, in detail, why.
>>
>> If discrimination against parts of the community is not enough for you,
>> here's why:
On Fri 28/Jun/2019 22:02:52 +0200 Joe wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 11:44:54 -0500 Dennis Wicks wrote:
>
>> I was thinking that I could setup a nameserver on my machine
>> with enries in it for the virtual hosts and have my local
>> network address in the list of nameservers in my
>> modem/rout
On Fri 12/Jul/2019 13:27:08 +0200 Reco wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 09:33:44AM +0300, Georgios wrote:
>> Hi there!
>>
>> Based on security and stability i was wondering what is more preferable?
>>
>> Installing apps through flatpak or through debian repositories?
>
> I trust Debian at packagin
On Thu 08/Aug/2019 15:02:38 +0200 John Hasler wrote:
> These sorts of "licenses" are actually attempts at a civil contract.
> They really have nothing to do with patent or copyright law. A civil
> contract requires agreement in advance, though.
I had always considered those must-reply-yes que
On Thu 08/Aug/2019 13:50:40 +0200 John Hasler wrote:
> tomas writes:
>> This is one of those cases: if you're using a piece of non-free
>> software, you should know about it, and you should know which buy
>> decision led to it (so you can take that into account at your next buy
>> decision).
>
>
On Sat 17/Aug/2019 04:13:28 +0200 Steffen Dettmer wrote:
> - https://wiki.debian.org/LSBInitScripts
> - https://wiki.debian.org/LSBInitScripts/DependencyBasedBoot
>
> It would be great if someone experienced could take a look. Especially
> the last two pages could need more updating, since AFAIK i
On Mon 19/Aug/2019 03:15:45 +0200 Celejar wrote:
> I think terming Google's decision to call software that doesn't
> implement OAuth "less secure" "evil" is hyperbole that doesn't help our
> broader cause of opposing its breaking of standards, imposing various
> sorts of lock-in, invasions of priv
On Mon 19/Aug/2019 18:05:57 +0200 Celejar wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 17:21:40 +0200
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:06:33AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> I'd love to run my own mail stack, and I think I could handle the
>>> software deployment reasonably well, but from every
On Tue 20/Aug/2019 19:26:23 +0200 Michael Stone wrote:
>> If you are not spamming people you also will not end up on a blacklist.
>
> Well, actual real-world experience shows that to not be true.
You should (noisily) bring out that case!
Blacklists have to balance between reliability and comple
On Tue 20/Aug/2019 23:11:27 +0200 Michael Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 11:10:08PM +0300, Reco wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 03:45:31PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 08:39:43PM +0300, Reco wrote:
Unless a blacklist adds victims by AS number, a change of M
Hi,
I've been trying to install 10.0 via netinst. It cannot reach the screen card
(the laptop is HP-G62), but it also has some funny behavior, like not adding
/sbin to the PATH after a successful su command.
I never installed Buster before. Am I better off installing Stretch and then
upgrade?
On Tue 03/Sep/2019 16:28:48 +0200 Greg Wooledge wrote:
>> On Mon, 2 Sep 2019 22:50:41 +0200 Alessandro Vesely wrote:
>>> I've been trying to install 10.0 via netinst. but it also has
>>> some funny behavior, like not adding /sbin to the PATH after a
>>> suc
On Wed 04/Sep/2019 20:12:55 +0200 Étienne Mollier wrote:
> Sven, on 2019-09-03:
>> On 2019-09-03 21:49 +0200, Étienne Mollier wrote:
>>> It is possible that your hardware is a wee bit too recent for
>>> Debian 10 vanilla: Vega support for the amdgpu driver landed in
>>> Linux 4.20, but Debian 10 sh
On Thu 05/Sep/2019 22:00:58 +0200 Étienne Mollier wrote:
> Ale, on 2019-09-05:
>> On Wed 04/Sep/2019 20:12:55 +0200 Étienne Mollier wrote:
>> > Thank you Sven for pointing this out! You're right, I've been
>> > confused by personal experience with other chips. Installation
>> > of "firmware-amd-g
On Wed 15/Aug/2018 08:31:32 +0200 mick crane wrote:
> On 2018-08-14 09:08, Remigio wrote:
>> [...]
>> Could you help me please to understand where are network configuration
>> files and how to manage them?
>
> I too have been wondering about this and the wiki seems clear.
> https://wiki.debian.org
On Thu 16/Aug/2018 14:02:08 +0200 Reco wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 12:04:28PM +0200, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
>> On Wed 15/Aug/2018 08:31:32 +0200 mick crane wrote:
>>>
>>> I too have been wondering about this and the wiki seems clear.
>>> https://
On Tue 16/Oct/2018 17:52:15 +0200 Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 04:18:52PM +0200, john doe wrote:
>> Hopefully, both parties (Debian/Devian) will come back to there senses
>> and will find a way to accomodate supporting Systemd and an alternative
>> init daemon.
>
> In the case
On Tue 16/Oct/2018 16:54:57 +0200 Morel Bérenger wrote:
> Le Sun, 14 Oct 2018 10:23:15 -0400,
> Dan Ritter a écrit :
>
>> I have encountered no problems that can be attributed to my choice of
>> init system.
>
> Doing the same. Works fine, except the fact network interfaces that are
> using DHCP
Hi all,
early this morning a network card burned out. A few hours later, the server
was not responding on any network address, nor on the system console. I had to
power it down.
Upon rebooting, network errors were detected an I arranged the server to work
with the available hardware. The last l
On Thu 25/Oct/2018 20:30:27 +0200 Brian wrote:
> On Thu 25 Oct 2018 at 19:53:26 +0200, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>> early this morning a network card burned out. A few hours later, the server
>> was not responding on any network address, nor on the syste
On Fri 26/Oct/2018 11:27:36 +0200 Reco wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 11:23:39AM +0200, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
>> The problem is that the server froze. I don't think that's what it is
>> supposed
>> to do when a card fails.
>
> It's my impressio
On Thu 03/Jan/2019 18:53:14 +0100 Miles Fidelman wrote:
> [...]
> And then there was all the bullshit about how systemd was handled -
> including resignations of core developers over it.
Given the current cooperation between Devuan and Debian maintainers on
init-diversity, I'd say that issue is f
On Tue 12/Mar/2019 09:39:53 +0100 didier gaumet wrote:
> Wikipedia makes a comparison of Linux antivirus:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_antivirus_software#Linux
It's astonishing that there is an "Email Security" column, with random yes/no
contents. I wrote a note on that:
http
Hi,
On 13/10/2019 14:09, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks Reco.
>
> On 13/10/19 9:59 pm, Reco wrote:
> [...]
>
>> I'd send a mail to postmas...@noloop.tana.it, IIRC one of this
>> list members is behind it.
Didn't get it
> Hopeful
Hi again,
On 14/10/2019 16:04, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 14/10/19 9:42 pm, 황병희 wrote:
>> Andrew McGlashan writes:
>
>> There was related discussion: it's very seriosus...
>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=754809
>
> Okay, well, I have p=quarantine for my setup, n
On Mon 18/Nov/2019 21:15:41 +0100 Reco wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 12:57:16PM -0700, D. R. Evans wrote:
>> I see that the update to debian stable that I was going to do today
>> wants to update thunderbird but remove enigmail.
That seems to affect oldstable too, but kept back. I have:
~# ap
On Mon 02/Dec/2019 10:35:26 +0100 Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>
> You might want to install iptables-persistent, otherwise you'll have to
> roll-out your own solution.
I'm not using iptables-persistent, but just looked at it out of curiosity.
Its LSB:
### BEGIN INIT INFO
# Provides: netfil
On Sat 14/Dec/2019 03:18:39 +0100 Kenneth Parker wrote:
>
> I use Devuan, especially on older hardware. Works well.
Good to know. For the time being, I see SysV is working. I'm on old-stable
Debian. As, in a few months, it will be time to migrate, I'll have to decide
on Devuan (current) vs
Hi all!
https://packages.debian.org/jessie/firefox-esr says version 52.2.0esr-1~deb8u1
However, after running apt-get update, I get
root@pcale:~# apt-cache policy firefox-esr
firefox-esr:
Installed: 45.9.0esr-1~deb8u1
Candidate: 45.9.0esr-1~deb8u1
Version table:
*** 45.9.0esr-1~deb8u1 0
On Tue 20/Jun/2017 14:14:56 +0200 Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:38:05AM +0200, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
>> root@pcale:~# apt-cache policy firefox-esr
>> firefox-esr:
>> Installed: 45.9.0esr-1~deb8u1
>> Candidate: 45.9.0esr-1~deb8u1
>> V
On Sun 02/Jul/2017 12:37:33 +0200 Christian Seiler wrote:
> On 07/02/2017 11:24 AM, Michael Fothergill wrote:
>> Could this be exploited to force people to use sysvinit instead of systemd ?
:-)
> This bug has nothing to do with systemd as the init system, it's in an
> optional component that's d
On Sun 02/Jul/2017 15:13:06 +0200 Christian Seiler wrote:
> (To clarify: I'm not saying that people who don't like systemd
> can't be rational, but I do think that anyone who claims to see
> a conspiracy here is not taking a rational position.)
Admittedly it was somewhat tongue-in-cheek, although
There are salient discrepancies in copylefting collective work —as there are
mismatches in working as a free software developer in a western economic model.
Let me just say that this discussion, working out the legal details of the
problem, is very interesting. I guess that's how every inch of fr
On Sun 16/Jul/2017 17:17:21 +0200 Martin Read wrote:
> On 16/07/17 12:47, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
>> May I ask, in passing, why Debian (for packages like apt, say) as well as
>> Linux
>> did not switch to GPLv3? Would such switch ease enforcement?
>
> Switching a p
On Wed 19/Jul/2017 23:14:35 +0200 Martin Read wrote:
> On 19/07/17 12:17, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
>> One my wonder why GRSecurity is not (optionally) included in Linux.
>
> For a variety of reasons relating to the personalities and opinions of the
> people who would be involv
On Thu 20/Jul/2017 22:18:25 +0200 Fungi4All wrote:
>> > On 19/07/17 12:17, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
>>
>> Of course, nobody dislikes security. Making it neat and clear is another
>> question, and that"s why experiments are needed. Can we consider Linux and
>&
On Tue 20/Jun/2017 14:14:56 +0200 Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:38:05AM +0200, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
>> root@pcale:~# apt-cache policy firefox-esr
>> [... output snipped ...]
>
> You appear to be missing your security.debian.org source.
Adding secur
On Sat 29/Jul/2017 12:31:03 +0200 Frank wrote:
> Op 29-07-17 om 12:20 schreef Alessandro Vesely:
>> (I tried ``deb http://security.debian.org/ jessie-security main'' but got W:
>> Failed to fetch
>> http://security.debian.org/dists/jessie-security/main/binary-a
On Mon 15/Jan/2018 00:19:24 +0100 Brian wrote:
> On Sun 14 Jan 2018 at 16:43:53 -0500, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> On Sunday, January 14, 2018 02:26:03 PM Brian wrote:
>>> On Sun 14 Jan 2018 at 12:49:46 -0500, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, January 14, 2018 10:36:40 AM J.W. Foster wr
On Mon 15/Jan/2018 16:23:54 +0100 rhkramer wrote:
> On Monday, January 15, 2018 04:39:17 AM Alessandro Vesely wrote:
>> Since most email messages are sent in cleartext, it is also worth to note
>> explicitly the difference in terms of privacy between receiving and
>> col
On Sun 21/Jan/2018 20:53:43 +0100 Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> On 21/01/18 16:05, Mark Fletcher wrote:
>> To get you started [addressing the OP], here is the service file I use:
>
> Mine is slightly different and has the commands inline:
>
>
> $ cat /etc/iptables/iptables.service
> [Unit]
> Descr
On Thu 24/May/2018 03:33:52 +0200 bw wrote:
> On Thu, 24 May 2018, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
>> On 24/05/18 12:40, bw wrote:
>>> Okay, I must have something misconfigured.
Yes, ~/.reportbugrc
>>> [...]
>>> Connecting to packages.debian.org via SMTP...
>>> SMTP send failure: {'m...@packages.debia
Hi,
after upgrading to sretch, no graphics work anymore. The upgrade brought in
systemd-sysv instead of sysvinit-core, which I had in jessie. I don't know
which other packages, if any, went that route...
Gdm3 wasn't even able to display anything readable. It worked well in
jessie. In s
fferent code depending on the kernel version? Or does the bad
kernel return null pointers in places where the old kernel returned valid
stuff? (BTW, now I've been using X for a couple of hours, and didn't see any
kernel messages since.)
Ciao
Ale
On Sun 10/Sep/2017 13:26:43 +0200 Ale
Interesting... My system seems to be worse than yours, as it crashes outright
rather than producing inconsistent behavior. I also use radeon, but don't know
if that issue is hw-related.
Try booting an old 3.* kernel, if you still have one. That restored my
system's reliability. Check dmesg dif
On Fri 27/Oct/2017 05:21:48 +0200 John Hasler wrote:
> Celejar writes:
>> https://www.linuxcounter.net/
>> I don't know how meaningful its data are.
>
> Utterly useless.
Er... why was the OP looking for that data?
Ale
--
48 matches
Mail list logo
