I have prepared some packages that update some packages that are not or
only in an older version in Debian 3.0r1. Please read [1] for more
information (and read the FAQ before sending mails to me).
I try my best to avoid problems with both installing these packages on
Debian 3.0 and upgrading with
I have prepared some packages that update some packages that are not or
only in an older version in Debian 3.0r1. Please read [1] for more
information (and read the FAQ before sending mails to me).
I try my best to avoid problems with both installing these packages on
Debian 3.0 and upgrading with
I have prepared some packages that update some packages that are not or
only in an older version in Debian 3.0r1. Please read [1] for more
information (and read the FAQ before sending mails to me).
I try my best to avoid problems with both installing these packages on
Debian 3.0 and upgrading with
Since some people seem to thing apt pinning can solve all problems with
outdated packages in stable I want to explain why this is wrong:
apt pinning is good if you are running testing but need a package (e.g.
a security update) from unstable.
There are people that use apt pinning to install pack
I have prepared some packages that update some packages that are not or
only in an older version in Debian 3.0r1. Please read [1] for more
information (and read the FAQ before sending mails to me).
I try my best to avoid problems with both installing these packages on
Debian 3.0 and upgrading with
On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 12:39:32AM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
> Thanks you for your interesting review of apt pinning and their security
> implications. I think the real mith is "novice user can *upgrade*
> system to the *latest* unstable distribution by apt-get."
>
> I saw many unexpe
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 11:21:01AM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 02:59:17PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >Every user of testing knows that he must read debian-security-announce
> >and if needed install fixes from unstable since it can take an arbitrary
&g
I have prepared some packages that update some packages that are not or
only in an older version in Debian 3.0r1. Please read [1] for more
information (and read the FAQ before sending mails to me).
I try my best to avoid problems with both installing these packages on
Debian 3.0 and upgrading with
I have prepared some packages that update some packages that are not or
only in an older version in Debian 3.0r1. Please read [1] for more
information (and read the FAQ before sending mails to me).
I try my best to avoid problems with both installing these packages on
Debian 3.0 and upgrading with
I have prepared some packages that update some packages that are not or
only in an older version in Debian 3.0r1. Please read [1] for more
information (and read the FAQ before sending mails to me).
I try my best to avoid problems with both installing these packages on
Debian 3.0 and upgrading with
I have prepared some packages that update some packages that are not or
only in an older version in Debian 3.0r1. Please read [1] for more
information (and read the FAQ before sending mails to me).
I try my best to avoid problems with both installing these packages on
Debian 3.0 and upgrading with
I have prepared some packages that update some packages that are not or
only in an older version in Debian 3.0r1. Please read [1] for more
information (and read the FAQ before sending mails to me).
I try my best to avoid problems with both installing these packages on
Debian 3.0 and upgrading with
I have prepared some packages that update some packages that are not or
only in an older version in Debian 3.0r0. Please read [1] for more
information (and read the FAQ before sending mails to me).
I try my best to avoid problems with both installing these packages on a
Debian 3.0 and upgrading wi
I have prepared some packages that update some packages that are not or
only in an older version in Debian 3.0r0. Please read [1] for more
information (and read the FAQ before sending mails to me).
I try my best to avoid problems with both installing these packages on a
Debian 3.0 and upgrading wi
I have prepared the packages needed to run kernels up to 2.4.19 on a
Debian 2.2r7 (potato) system. Please read [1] for more information.
The updated kernel packages contain a fix for a i386 DoS attack that
allows every user to crash the computer [2]. If you run older kernels
on a computer where y
I have prepared some packages that update some packages that are not or
only in an older version in Debian 3.0r0. Please read [1] for more
information (and read the FAQ before sending mails to me).
I try my best to avoid problems with both installing these packages on a
Debian 3.0 and upgrading wi
I have prepared some packages that update some packages that are not or
only in an older version in Debian 3.0r1. Please read [1] for more
information (and read the FAQ before sending mails to me).
I try my best to avoid problems with both installing these packages on
Debian 3.0 and upgrading with
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 08:14:14PM -0500, James D Strandboge wrote:
> I am the maintainer of the gnome 2.2 backport for woody, and I have been
> getting a lot of questions regarding the semi-official backport of
> openoffice for woody. It depends on woody's libfreetype, whereas my
> gnome 2.2 bac
I have prepared some packages that update some packages that are not or
only in an older version in Debian 3.0r0. Please read [1] for more
information (and read the FAQ before sending mails to me).
I try my best to avoid problems with both installing these packages on a
Debian 3.0 and upgrading wi
I have prepared some packages that update some packages that are not or
only in an older version in Debian 3.0r1. Please read [1] for more
information (and read the FAQ before sending mails to me).
I try my best to avoid problems with both installing these packages on a
Debian 3.0 and upgrading wi
I have prepared some packages that update some packages that are not or
only in an older version in Debian 3.0r1. Please read [1] for more
information (and read the FAQ before sending mails to me).
I try my best to avoid problems with both installing these packages on a
Debian 3.0 and upgrading wi
I have prepared some packages that update some packages that are not or
only in an older version in Debian 3.0r1. Please read [1] for more
information (and read the FAQ before sending mails to me).
I try my best to avoid problems with both installing these packages on
Debian 3.0 and upgrading with
I have prepared some packages that update some packages that are not or
only in an older version in Debian 3.0r1. Please read [1] for more
information (and read the FAQ before sending mails to me).
I try my best to avoid problems with both installing these packages on
Debian 3.0 and upgrading with
I have prepared some packages that update some packages that are not or
only in an older version in Debian 3.0r1. Please read [1] for more
information (and read the FAQ before sending mails to me).
I try my best to avoid problems with both installing these packages on
Debian 3.0 and upgrading with
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Leonard Leblanc wrote:
> Can someone point me to a doc or howto on how to create .deb files?
Look at the docs at [1], especially helpful for beginners is the
"New Maintainers' Guide".
> Leonard Leblanc
cu,
Adrian
[1] http://www.debian.org/devel
--
Nicht weil die Dinge
[please excuse that my English isn't perfect - I'm not a native speaker]
I have prepared the packages needed to run kernels up to 2.4.1 on a
potato system. Please read the whole mail before you install these
packages.
Warnings
Please consider the following before you install these pac
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>...
> # ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1
> SIOCSIFADDR: Bad file descriptor
> lo: unknown interface: Bad file descriptor
>
> # ifconfig lo down
> lo: unknown interface: Bad file descriptor
>
> Any help is appreciated.
This has nothing to do with your new kernel.
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, Lindsay Allen wrote:
> > >You need the modutils in testing/unstable. The version in potato is too
> > >old, as the layout of modules in /lib/modules has changed since then.
> > >The newer modutils is compiled against a newer glibc, so you might have
> > >to build it from source
On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, Morten Bo Johansen wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone could provide me with a link
> explaining the steps one needs to take to install a 2.4
> kernel on a potato system. I suppose that several packages
> (e.g. pppd) need to be updated to get a functioning system..
I have rebui
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, David Wright wrote:
>...
> 2.4 kernels missed the boat for getting into the current stable=potato,
> so you're going to have to do the same sort of thing. Debian will not
> add new packages to its stable distribution just so that it works with
> a kernel that happens to be call
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Tom George wrote:
> Before compiling the 2.4.1 kernel I used apt-get dist-upgrade to
> install all the available upgrades in the stable distribution,. I then
> checked against the list in changes and found that I still had only
> modutils 2.3.11-13.1. I used apt-get install
On Sun, 11 Feb 2001, Rino Mardo wrote:
>...
> someone from this list posted the following which i've used for my potato
> using
> 2.4.1 kernel. this could help you:
I have made something similar at [1].
>...
> One addition: This archive works *only* with apt-get. You can't access it
> direct vi
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I just upgraded my kernel from 2.2.17 to 2.4.1 and when I boot I get errors
> that can't initilize /lib/modules/2.4.1/modules.dep directory not found.
> Or something like this. I know this is true because all I have are my 2.2.17
> modules.
>
> I co
On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Ker Ruben Ramos wrote:
> What does "PPP - VJ decompression error" in my debug.log/syslog.log ? how do
> I fix this?
Which Kernel and which version of the Kernel? If kernel 2.4.x and
ppp < 2.4 you should upgrade ppp. See [1] where to find this package
recompiled for potato.
c
On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Charles Lewis wrote:
> Getting the following dependency problem in dselect:
>
> libgdk-pixbuf-gnome2 depends on libgdk-pixbuf2 (= 0.9.0-3)
>
> When I look up the package in dselect is shows:
>
> EIOM Pri Sect PackageInst.verAvail.ver Description
> *** Opt libs l
On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Ameurlain Antoine wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
> I recently installed a package (aterm) from its debian package file
> with dpkg -i. Since I have a compiled version of Xfree864.0, I had
> to force the installation (aterm required "xlibs" which I haven't got).
> Fine.
> But now, apt-ge
On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Nathan Dabney wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 01:38:32PM +0100, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> >
> > BTW: the Problem is upstream and fixed in 1.59. I have uploaded 1.58-2 which
> > will fix that, too. Don't know why it is not installed yet.
>
> So when should 1.58-2 come down the
On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, John Galt wrote:
> Your modutils is out of date. Either get Testing's, or wait until Adrian
> Bunk sets up the convience package for 2.4 kernels w/ potato.
I've already set it up. Please read [1] for more information.
cu,
Adrian
[1] http://www.fs.tum.de
On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Hanno Böttcher wrote:
> Hi !
Hi Hanno,
> I just downloaded the above package and visited packages.debian.org for
> beeing sure I have all things the Kernel Package depends on. But everytime I
> try to make a build I get parse errors and I don't know why (I checked file
> per
On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Robin Rowe wrote:
> I have some apps I want to build that require newer libs than what I have
> installed from stable. How do I tell dselect/apt/dpkg to let me pick the
> newer SDL lib (for instance) out of tested, bring with it any dependent libs
> (which may also be in teste
On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Robin Rowe wrote:
> Hi. I don't seem to have it right. I get an error on 'apt-get install
> libsdl1.1-dev':
>
> Reading Package Lists...
> Building Dependency Tree...
> E: Couldn't find package libsdl1.1-dev
>
> Here's my sources.list:
>
> deb http://http.us.de
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Chris Gray wrote:
> I'm running the unstable dist and a recent upgrade seems to have destroyed
> information needed for my network interfaces. Running ifconfig displays
> the proper details for eth0 and lo but running ifup gives a "Bad file
> descriptor" error. The /etc/netw
On Sat, 17 Feb 2001, David B. Harris wrote:
> To quote "Dean A. Roman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> # Hello all,
> #
> #I recently configured, compiled, and installed the 2.4.1 kernel.
> So
> # far things are going ok with it.
> #
> # However, modprobe has stopped working correctly, and can't find a
On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Aaron Brashears wrote:
> I'd like to try out kernel 2.4.1 from unstable, but I wanted to know
> if there's anything I should be wary of. A quick search through the
> archives of debain-user revealed there's *something* with modconf, but
> I'm not sure what the problem is.
>...
On Sat, 24 Feb 2001, Jason N. Price wrote:
>...
> 2) I'm planning on upgrading to 2.4.2 - anything I should be aware of? Is
> this a stable kernel?
>...
2.4.2 is a stable kernel. When you upgrade you might need some of the
packages you find at [1], at least modutils when your kernel is modular.
On Sun, 25 Feb 2001, Sebastiaan wrote:
> Hi,
> I am trying to set up a network connection between two computers which are
> connected with a serial cable (null modem).
> One computer is an i386 with 2.4.0, the other is an Macintosh Quadra 610
^^^
> with 2.2.10, bot
On Sat, 3 Mar 2001, Ankit Jain wrote:
> I have a fresh installation of Debian 2.2r2(Potato) with kernel
> 2.2.18pre21. I compiled and installed kernel 2.4.1 (following
> the instructions given in kernel-package) It installed fine..
> but when i boot it , it can't find any modules! the mods are
> i
I have prepared the packages needed to run kernels up to 2.4.2 on a Debian
2.2r2 (potato) system. Please read [1] for more information.
Changes since the last release:
+ added: kernel-source-2.4.2
Binary packages:
o kernel-doc-2.4.2
o kernel-so
On Sun, 4 Mar 2001, Kevin C. Smith wrote:
>...
> Will there be a problem moving the OS from the 10 GB to the 40 GB?
> I plan to increase the partition sizes of /usr/local and /home on the 40 GB.
> Any advice on how to do move the OS over?
I did the same using the "Hard Disk Upgrade Mini How-To" a
On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, Jens Lauterbach wrote:
> hi!
Hi Jens!
> I'm about to install potato (2.2.17) (firewall purpose)!
> I would like to upgrade to 2.4.2, so what is the best way to get it done!
>
> Just get the kernel source, compile and install the new kernel???
>
> But what about all the deb-pa
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, CaT wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 03:32:51PM -0700, Dean Allen Provins wrote:
> > Hello:
> >
> > I just upgraded my 2.4.0 kernel to 2.4.2 (via 2 patches) and PPP
> > immediately failed. The connection was made, but an IOCTL said there
> > was an argument error, and PPPD ab
I have prepared the packages needed to run kernels up to 2.4.2 on a Debian
2.2r2 (potato) system. Please read [1] for more information.
The most notably change since the last release is that I've added kernel
images (these are the images that are currently in incoming).
Changes since the last r
I have prepared the packages needed to run kernels up to 2.4.2 on a Debian
2.2r2 (potato) system. Please read [1] for more information.
Changes since the last release:
+ added: devfsd
+ added: libxml2
Binary packages:
o libxml2
o libx
I have prepared the packages needed to run kernels up to 2.4.2 on a Debian
2.2r2 (potato) system. Please read [1] for more information.
The problems some people had with the kernel images should be fixed with
the new initrd-tools package.
Changes since the last release:
+ updated: ini
On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, Toens Bueker wrote:
> Hi *,
Hi Toens,
> after a recent dist-upgrade I get this error-message when
> I try to start xterm, xconsole (or something else out of
> xbase-clients):
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:$ xterm
> xterm: error while loading shared libraries: /usr/X11R6/lib/libXaw.s
On 24 Mar 2001, Pierfrancesco Caci wrote:
> :-> "Romanenko" == Romanenko M A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>...
> you probably have libc-i686 installed. Remove it, upgrade the normal
> libc and then you can reinstall libc-i686.
>...
He shouldn't reinstall libc-i686. From the changelog of glibc-2.2
On 1 Feb 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>...
> Has somebody successfully compiled a 2.0 kernel with egcs
> or is it necessary to reinstall gcc2.7?
I didn't try it, but even early 2.2.x kernel had problems with egcs. It's
the best if you install an old gcc (package altgcc).
> Thanks
>
> Hubert
On Sat, 5 Feb 2000, Eric G . Miller wrote:
> > --
> > dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of xserver-mach64:
> > xserver-mach64 depends on libz1; however:
> > Package libz1 is not installed.
> > dpkg: error processing x
On Sun, 6 Feb 2000, Bruno Boettcher wrote:
> hello,
>
> i just made an upgrade to the latest potato, and unfortunately i still cna't
> compile my latex-files. i have to go onto a very old slackware3 system to
> compile them... a shame..
>
> when trying to compile my files i still get the
Hi,
I'm looking for a list of all packages that are new (not only a newer
version) in potato compared to slink. Is something like that available
somewhere?
Thanks,
Adrian
I have prepared the packages needed to run kernels up to 2.4.5 on a Debian
2.2r3 (potato) system. Please read [1] for more information.
Changes since the last release:
+ added: quota
+ added: rarpd
+ updated: e2fsprogs (1.20-1 -> 1.22-1)
+ updated: ppp (2.
I have prepared the packages needed to run kernels up to 2.4.7 on a Debian
2.2r3 (potato) system. Please read [1] for more information.
Changes since the last release:
+ added: kernel-image-2.4.7-i386
Binary packages:
o kernel-headers-2.4.7
o k
I have prepared the packages needed to run kernels up to 2.4.9 on a Debian
2.2r3 (potato) system. Please read [1] for more information.
Changes since the last release:
+ added: kernel-image-2.4.9-i386
Binary packages:
o kernel-headers-2.4.9
o k
On Sat, 16 Feb 2002, Samuel J MacDowell wrote:
> > The 2.95.4 is the gcc in Debian unstable that is a snapshot of the 2.95
> > branch in the gcc CVS. There's no officially released 2.95.4.
> Please would you mind be more specific about the URL :))
> I´ve been drifting around ftp.debian.org
On 24 Mar 2001, Krzys Majewski wrote:
> Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > lyx requires non-free software, thats a showstopper.
>
> It does? Which?
It requires the non-free XForms library. (but the lyx developers are
working on this - see [1] for more information).
> -chris
cu
Adria
On Sun, 25 Mar 2001, Tony Crawford wrote:
> Hi gang!
Hi Tony!
It seems the behavior of "make modules_install" has changed
> radically with linux 2.4. Or is it just me?
>
> Contrary to what I've become accustomed to, the 2.4.2 from
> kernel.org seems to have put all its modules into
> /lib/modul
I have prepared the packages needed to run kernels up to 2.4.2 on a Debian
2.2r2 (potato) system. Please read [1] for more information.
Changes since the last release:
+ updated: initrd-tools (0.1.4 -> 0.1.5)
+ updated: ipmasq (3.5.6 -> 3.5.7)
+ updated: kernel-sour
I have prepared the packages needed to run kernels up to 2.4.3 on a Debian
2.2r2 (potato) system. Please read [1] for more information.
It seems the isdnutils in potato is sufficient what means that the
packages seem to be complete - please contact me when you think that there
are still packages
I have prepared the packages needed to run kernels up to 2.4.3 on a Debian
2.2r2 (potato) system. Please read [1] for more information.
Changes since the last release:
+ added: kernel-source-2.4.3
Binary packages:
o kernel-doc-2.4.3
o kernel-so
I have prepared the packages needed to run kernels up to 2.4.3 on a Debian
2.2r2 (potato) system. Please read [1] for more information.
Most important change since the last release: I've added Herbert's kernel
images of kernel 2.4.3 and removed all 2.4.2 packages.
Changes since the last release:
I have prepared the packages needed to run kernels up to 2.4.3 on a Debian
2.2r3 (potato) system. Please read [1] for more information.
Changes since the last release:
+ added: ifupdown
+ added: net-tools
+ updated: initrd-tools (0.1.5 -> 0.1.7)
cu
Adrian
[1] htt
I have prepared the packages needed to run kernels up to 2.4.4 on a Debian
2.2r3 (potato) system. Please read [1] for more information.
The most important change in this release are the new kernel-* packages
(as always made by Herbert Xu) that include an important netfilter
security fix.
Changes
I have prepared the packages needed to run kernels up to 2.4.13 on a
Debian 2.2r3 (potato) system. Please read [1] for more information.
Changes since the last release:
+ added: i2c
Binary package:
o i2c-source
+ added: kernel-image-2.4.13-i386
On Mon, 29 Oct 2001, Kjell Helge Strøm (Online) wrote:
> I order to compile the kernel source ...should not an upgraded version of
> modutils also be added to your package list ?
I've heard of problems with the new modutils and old 2.4.x kernels but
I haven't heard of problems with older 2.4.
I have prepared the packages needed to run kernels up to 2.4.14 on a
Debian 2.2r4 (potato) system. Please read [1] for more information.
Changes since the last release:
+ there are now alpha packages compiled by Fabrice
Haberer-Proust
+ added: kernel-image-2.4.14-
I have prepared the packages needed to run kernels up to 2.4.10 on a
Debian 2.2r3 (potato) system. Please read [1] for more information.
Changes since the last release:
+ there are now powerpc packages compiled by Jens Kutilek
+ added: irda-tools
Binary packages:
On Sat, 6 Oct 2001, Jeffrin Jose T. wrote:
> Hello all ,
>
> The output of "ps x" at a particular situation is related to this ..
>
>
> Unknown HZ value! (12) Assume 100.
You use kernel 2.4.11-pre4 (and I think I remember this was mentioned on
linux-kernel some hours ago).
> Warning: /usr/src/
I have prepared the packages needed to run kernels up to 2.4.17 on a
Debian 2.2r4 (potato) system. Please read [1] for more information.
Changes since the last release:
+ added: kernel-image-2.4.17-i386
Binary packages:
o kernel-headers-2.4.17
I have prepared the packages needed to run kernels up to 2.4.17 on a
Debian 2.2r5 (potato) system. Please read [1] for more information.
Changes in this release:
+ fixed the bug that isdnutils erased /etc/services
if you were affected by this bug copy the file you can find
Hi,
the location of my packages to run kernel 2.4 on potato has changed.
The information how to get them is as usual available at [1].
cu
Adrian
[1] http://www.fs.tum.de/~bunk/kernel-24.html
I have prepared the packages needed to run kernels up to 2.4.4 on a Debian
2.2r3 (potato) system. Please read [1] for more information.
Changes since the last release:
+ added: isdnutils
Binary packages:
o ipppd
o isdnactivecards
I have prepared the packages needed to run kernels up to 2.4.4 on a Debian
2.2r3 (potato) system. Please read [1] for more information.
Changes since the last release:
+ added: varmon
+ updated: modutils (2.4.2-1 -> 2.4.6-3)
+ fixed the problem that isdnutils shipp
I have prepared the packages needed to run kernels up to 2.4.4 on a Debian
2.2r3 (potato) system. Please read [1] for more information.
The most important change is that there's now a second architecture
(sparc). Thanks to Marco for compiling the packages!
Changes since the last release:
I have prepared the packages needed to run kernels up to 2.4.5 on a Debian
2.2r3 (potato) system. Please read [1] for more information.
Changes since the last release:
+ added: amd
+ added: am-utils
+ added: pppoe
+ added: kernel-image-2.4.5-i386
Sorry for the cross-post. This is the only mail advertising these
packages I'll send to these lists.
There's a low traffic (approx. 1 Mail/week) announcement mailing list
that informs you about new releases of these packages (including
security fixes in the packages). To subscribe send a mail wit
On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 07:58:12AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been building kernels (vanilla from upstream) for years with
> kernel-package (typical command line: "time make-kpkg -j2 --initrd
> --revision 1.custom kernel_image"; .kernel-pkg.conf contains just the
> line "root_cmd = faker
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 12:05:19PM +0200, Pétùr wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have a computer which does not need anymore to be running the unstable
> version. I would like to migrate it to stable at some point.
>
> If I backup the home and rsync it on a new installation of Debian
> stable, I will
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 11:57:55AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Jun 2017 10:45:17 +0300
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 07:58:12AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I've been building kernels (vanilla from upstrea
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 10:20:09AM -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> There was a security advisory against openvpn a couple of days ago;
Yesterday, not a couple of days ago.
> just wondering when updated packages are likely to show up?
unstable is already fixed.
stable and oldstable will be fixe
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 11:11:47AM -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 23:10:21 +0300 Adrian Bunk
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 10:20:09AM -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> > > There was a security advisory against openvpn a couple of days
> >
On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 05:23:00PM -0400, Tony Baldwin wrote:
> Why is mc using nano when vim.tiny is set as my editor upon
> update-alternatives --config editor?, and, of course, mc is set to NOT use
> mcedit, its internal editor
What does "echo $EDITOR" say in your shell?
The update-alternative
On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 05:46:15PM -0400, Tony Baldwin wrote:
> On 10/07/2016 05:38 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 05:23:00PM -0400, Tony Baldwin wrote:
> > > Why is mc using nano when vim.tiny is set as my editor upon
> > > update-alternatives --con
Hi,
for the armel port in buster the question of raising the baseline came up.
20 years ago you could go into a shop and buy a mobile phone
with a CPU supported by the armel port in stretch.
Roger Shimizu is doing a great job on ARMv5 hardware and I've seen bug
reports from users on ARMv5 hardw
On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 01:43:50PM +0100, Héctor Orón Martínez wrote:
>...
> 2017-11-05 22:32 GMT+01:00 Adrian Bunk :
>
> > for the armel port in buster the question of raising the baseline came up.
>
> That has been a recurring question over the time, the reason to
> mai
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 12:52:05AM +0200, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
>
>... OMAP15xx is frequently tested and used
> by OMAP1 hackers (thanks to Amstrad Delta).
But is anyone still using Debian on OMAP15xx?
Looking at the amount of RAM in the Amstrad Delta,
I'd be surprised if anyone is actually using
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 10:56:03PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 9:18 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 12:52:05AM +0200, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> >>
> >>... OMAP15xx is frequently tested and used
> >> by OMAP1 hackers (t
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 09:37:10AM +, Lars Brinkhoff wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > If anyone is running stretch, buster or sid on ARMv4t hardware, then
> > please let us know what device and kernel you are using and whether
> > you intend to use buster.
>
> M
I have prepared the packages needed to run kernels up to 2.4.18 on a
Debian 2.2r6 (potato) system. Please read [1] for more information.
Changes in this release:
+ added: acpid
+ added: jfsutils
+ added: raidtools2
+ updated: pcmcia-cs (3.1.29-4 -> 3.1.33-
I have prepared the packages needed to run kernels up to 2.4.18 on a
Debian 2.2r6 (potato) system. Please read [1] for more information.
My packages will be available and and I'll make changes to them if needed
at least as long as Debian gives support (especially regarding security
fixes) for pot
99 matches
Mail list logo