Re: named.service or bind9.service or both?

2023-01-18 Thread Jesper Dybdal
On 2023-01-16 13:36, Greg Wooledge wrote: On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 10:42:35AM +0100, Jesper Dybdal wrote:  28969163  4 -rw-r--r--   1 root root  255 Jun  2 2016 /etc/systemd/system/bind9.service I suspect that the bind9 service ought to be removed.  Is that correct? ... In an

distupgrade & fasttrack

2023-01-18 Thread Wim Bertels
Hello, what is the policy/ability to distupgrade a server which also uses the fasttrack repository? kind regards, Wim

Re: named.service or bind9.service or both?

2023-01-18 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 6:25 AM Jesper Dybdal wrote: > > > On 2023-01-16 13:36, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 10:42:35AM +0100, Jesper Dybdal wrote: > >> 28969163 4 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 255 Jun 2 2016 > >> /etc/systemd/system/bind9.service > >> > >> I su

Re: named.service or bind9.service or both?

2023-01-18 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 12:25:03PM +0100, Jesper Dybdal wrote: > I have now, in order: > * Disabled bind9.service > * Corrected /etc/default/named so the named service can start (it was > missing the chroot) > * Stopped bind9.service > * Started named.service and checked that named i actually runni

Re: Running Windows on a VM: getting files from the original Windows host

2023-01-18 Thread Tom Browder
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 21:27 David wrote: ... > On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 at 10:39, Tom Browder wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 10:06 Tom Browder wrote: >>> In a previous thread you fellow Debianites gave me excellent advice on >>> running Windows on a VM >>> running on a Debian host. Now I have

Re: OpenSSL 3.0 support for Debian11

2023-01-18 Thread Ben Lavender
You are correct, perhaps I shouldn't have recommended that given I'm not sure of the OP's experience with Debian. I personally run it like this with no issues. On 18/01/2023 06:18, David wrote: On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 at 10:24, Ben Lavender wrote: Stable releases don't always provide the latest

Re: OpenSSL 3.0 support for Debian11

2023-01-18 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 1:19 AM David wrote: > > On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 at 10:24, Ben Lavender wrote: > > > Stable releases don't always provide the latest software, generally that > > isn't always respectively "stable". > > > > The latest seems to be available via the repositories Debian testing an

Re: named.service or bind9.service or both?

2023-01-18 Thread Jesper Dybdal
On 2023-01-18 13:55, Greg Wooledge wrote: On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 12:25:03PM +0100, Jesper Dybdal wrote: That leaves one file in the system with the name "bind9.service": /var/lib/systemd/deb-systemd-helper-enabled/multi-user.target.wants/bind9.service Can I safely delete that one (I suspect so)

Re: named.service or bind9.service or both?

2023-01-18 Thread Jesper Dybdal
On 2023-01-18 13:39, Jeffrey Walton wrote: On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 6:25 AM Jesper Dybdal wrote: That leaves one file in the system with the name "bind9.service": /var/lib/systemd/deb-systemd-helper-enabled/multi-user.target.wants/bind9.service Can I safely delete that one (I suspect so)? Will