The second disk would need to be connected to the running linux in some
way either by a disk dock or a disk caddy such that the running linux
could find the second disk using lsblk and blkid. Once located, parted -a
optimal /dev/xxx and then print to show the partition table then quit on
/dev/xxx
On 2022-08-02 05:17, David wrote:
And then use something like this:
https://www.newegg.com/sabrent-ec-dflt-dock/p/N82E16817366069
to connect disk "A" to machine "B".
StarTech external caddies/connectors seem OK.
mick
On Mon, 1 Aug 2022, Lee wrote:
Verizon FIOS finally rolled out IPv6 in my area. yay! I'd like for
my Debian server to have a static IPv6 address.. same as I have for
IPv4. But how to do that?
I have a Netgate firewall that does a dhcp6 request for a /56 from
Verizon, then the firewall delega
On 8/1/22, Andy Smith wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2022 at 01:57:42PM -0400, Lee wrote:
>> The dhcpv6 server on the netgate allows for static mappings like
>> ::1:10
>> where it fills in the network/64 portion from the delegation and uses
>> the ::a:b:c:d for the host address. I was ho
On Tue, 2 Aug 2022, Lee wrote:
On 8/1/22, Andy Smith wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, Aug 01, 2022 at 01:57:42PM -0400, Lee wrote:
The dhcpv6 server on the netgate allows for static mappings like
::1:10
where it fills in the network/64 portion from the delegation and uses
the ::a:b:c:d for the host
On 8/2/22, Tim Woodall wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Aug 2022, Lee wrote:
>
>> Verizon FIOS finally rolled out IPv6 in my area. yay! I'd like for
>> my Debian server to have a static IPv6 address.. same as I have for
>> IPv4. But how to do that?
>>
>> I have a Netgate firewall that does a dhcp6 request for
On 2/8/22 9:50 pm, Tim Woodall wrote:
This is a DNS & NTP server, so it needs a static address. I'd also
like different firewall rules for different machines.. which also
requires static addresses for at least some machines.
Yes there is - see my earlier reply.
ip token set ::/64 dev eth0
On Tue, 2 Aug 2022, Lee wrote:
On 8/2/22, Tim Woodall wrote:
On Mon, 1 Aug 2022, Lee wrote:
Verizon FIOS finally rolled out IPv6 in my area. yay! I'd like for
my Debian server to have a static IPv6 address.. same as I have for
IPv4. But how to do that?
I have a Netgate firewall that does
On 8/2/22, Jeremy Ardley wrote:
>
> On 2/8/22 9:50 pm, Tim Woodall wrote:
>>
>>> This is a DNS & NTP server, so it needs a static address. I'd also
>>> like different firewall rules for different machines.. which also
>>> requires static addresses for at least some machines.
>>>
>>
>> Yes there is
On Monday, August 01, 2022 12:08:47 PM Lee wrote:
> Verizon FIOS finally rolled out IPv6 in my area. yay!
I guess if I read that right, Verizon still supports IPv4 and has not
announced any plans to discontinue it?
I feel like I'm getting too old to learn (too many) new things, so if my ISP
m
On 8/2/22, Tim Woodall wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Aug 2022, Lee wrote:
>
>> On 8/2/22, Tim Woodall wrote:
>>> On Mon, 1 Aug 2022, Lee wrote:
>>>
Verizon FIOS finally rolled out IPv6 in my area. yay! I'd like for
my Debian server to have a static IPv6 address.. same as I have for
IPv4. But
On 8/2/22, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, August 01, 2022 12:08:47 PM Lee wrote:
>> Verizon FIOS finally rolled out IPv6 in my area. yay!
>
> I guess if I read that right, Verizon still supports IPv4 and has not
> announced any plans to discontinue it?
correct
it's quite likely that I'll
Hello,
On Tue, Aug 02, 2022 at 10:44:54AM -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, August 01, 2022 12:08:47 PM Lee wrote:
> > Verizon FIOS finally rolled out IPv6 in my area. yay!
>
> I guess if I read that right, Verizon still supports IPv4 and has not
> announced any plans to discontinu
On Tue, 2 Aug 2022, Lee wrote:
On 8/2/22, Tim Woodall wrote:
On Tue, 2 Aug 2022, Lee wrote:
On 8/2/22, Tim Woodall wrote:
On Mon, 1 Aug 2022, Lee wrote:
Verizon FIOS finally rolled out IPv6 in my area. yay! I'd like for
my Debian server to have a static IPv6 address.. same as I have for
On 7/27/2022 1:51 PM, Erik Mathis wrote:
> I would look at the UEFI vs BIOS boot options in the "backup" server and
> compare it to the "broken" server and make sure they are the same. Also check
> for BIOS updates and such.
>
>
> -Erik-
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 7:59 AM tony wrote:
>
>
On Tuesday, August 02, 2022 11:04:13 AM Andy Smith wrote:
> But in reality you probably aren't ever going to have to take
> any action with regard to IPv6.
...
> Most of Sky's
> customers will not know or care that at some point IPv6 got switched
> on for them.
Well, I know this is probably a si
On Tue, Aug 02, 2022 at 12:01:44PM -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I know this is probably a silly worry, but I run behind an IPv4 NAT,
which makes me feel fairly safe.
This is a common, but wrong, idea; NAT doesn't keep you safe, a packet
filter keeps you safe. You can have either one
On 2022-08-02, Andy Smith wrote:
>
>> Or, I'd be looking for a very simple explanation of how to switch to and use
>> Ipv6 -- not looking for that now, but Imight have to at some point. :-(
>
> Just do nothing.
>
That's exactly what I've done about it, nothing. All I've understood
concerning the
Hello,
On Tue, Aug 02, 2022 at 12:01:44PM -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> I know that IPv6 is a much larger address space so, iiuc, it would be harder
> for a "cracker" to find IPv6, but I'd probably want to continue to run behind
> NAT, so the idea that I wouldn't even know if my ISP switche
Hello,
On Tue, Aug 02, 2022 at 04:38:31PM -, Curt wrote:
> I'm uncertain what happens with local addresses [in IPv6], if
> anything.
At the moment if you are using RFC1918 IPv4 addresses on your
network, it's either an isolated network, or else it has a router
that does NAT to convert those t
Am Tue, 2 Aug 2022 10:44:54 -0400
schrieb rhkra...@gmail.com:
> I guess if I read that right, Verizon still supports IPv4 and has not
> announced any plans to discontinue it?
>
> I feel like I'm getting too old to learn (too many) new things, so if
> my ISP made a similar announcement, I'd want
Am Tue, 2 Aug 2022 12:01:44 -0400
schrieb rhkra...@gmail.com:
> I know that IPv6 is a much larger address space so, iiuc, it would be
> harder for a "cracker" to find IPv6, but I'd probably want to
> continue to run behind NAT, so the idea that I wouldn't even know if
> my ISP switched to IPv6 doe
Am Tue, 2 Aug 2022 16:40:42 +
schrieb Andy Smith :
> It's possible that some providers might do IPv6 NAT as well, but I
> think the majority would just apply some default and quite
> restrictive packet filter rules.
I have never seen that and it makes no sense to do that for a provider
becaus
Am Tue, 2 Aug 2022 16:38:31 - (UTC)
schrieb Curt :
> I'm uncertain what happens with local addresses, if anything.
You RFC1918 IPv4 addresses will stay the same and you computer will get
additional addresses from a /64 subnet of 2000::/3.
These are public addresses - no nasty and slow NAT an
Dear Colleagues,
I'm trying to quiet apt's output by using `apt-get -qqy` in a CI/CD
pipeline, however I still see ugly stuff like this in my CI/CD log:
Selecting previously unselected package php-common.
(Reading database ...
(Reading database ... 5%
(Reading database ... 10%
(Reading database
On Tue, 2 Aug 2022, Andy Smith wrote:
Similarly, it is already possible to have your local network be
IPv6-only and have the router convert anything that is v4-only back
to IPv4. Some mobile networks work like this, and more and more
networks might go this way as v6 eclipses v4, but that is ver
On Tue 02 Aug 2022 at 18:27:22 (+), Victor Sudakov wrote:
> I'm trying to quiet apt's output by using `apt-get -qqy` in a CI/CD
> pipeline, however I still see ugly stuff like this in my CI/CD log:
>
> Selecting previously unselected package php-common.
> (Reading database ...
> (Reading data
David Wright wrote:
> On Tue 02 Aug 2022 at 18:27:22 (+), Victor Sudakov wrote:
> > I'm trying to quiet apt's output by using `apt-get -qqy` in a CI/CD
> > pipeline, however I still see ugly stuff like this in my CI/CD log:
> >
> > Selecting previously unselected package php-common.
> > (Readi
On Tue, 2 Aug 2022 Victor Sudakov wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
I'm trying to quiet apt's output by using `apt-get -qqy` in a CI/CD
pipeline, however I still see ugly stuff like this in my CI/CD log:
Selecting previously unselected package php-common.
(Reading database ...
(Reading database ... 5%
(R
On 8/2/22 11:27, Victor Sudakov wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
I'm trying to quiet apt's output by using `apt-get -qqy` in a CI/CD
pipeline, however I still see ugly stuff like this in my CI/CD log:
Selecting previously unselected package php-common.
(Reading database ...
(Reading database ... 5%
(Rea
davidson wrote:
> >
> > I'm trying to quiet apt's output by using `apt-get -qqy` in a CI/CD
> > pipeline, however I still see ugly stuff like this in my CI/CD log:
> >
> > Selecting previously unselected package php-common.
> > (Reading database ...
> > (Reading database ... 5%
> > (Reading databas
David Christensen wrote:
> >
> > I don't actually like the idea of redirecting apt-get's output to
> > /dev/null because I want to see the list of packages installed, but without
> > these pseudographics. Do you think it's possible? Any ideas?
>
>
> I prefer the idea of collecting all of the dat
Hello,
On Tue, Aug 02, 2022 at 06:23:26PM +, Marco wrote:
> Am Tue, 2 Aug 2022 16:40:42 +
> schrieb Andy Smith :
>
> > It's possible that some providers might do IPv6 NAT as well, but I
> > think the majority would just apply some default and quite
> > restrictive packet filter rules.
>
On 8/2/22 15:53, Victor Sudakov wrote:
David Christensen wrote:
I don't actually like the idea of redirecting apt-get's output to
/dev/null because I want to see the list of packages installed, but without
these pseudographics. Do you think it's possible? Any ideas?
I prefer the idea of coll
David Christensen wrote:
> On 8/2/22 15:53, Victor Sudakov wrote:
> >
> > (Un)fortunately this is a CI/CD pipeline, the VM and its data will be
> > gone forever after the build. Unless I care to keep apt output as an
> > artifact somewhere which is IMHO an overkill. I just want an concise
> > CI/C
On Tue, 2 Aug 2022 Victor Sudakov wrote:
davidson wrote:
I'm trying to quiet apt's output by using `apt-get -qqy` in a CI/CD
pipeline, however I still see ugly stuff like this in my CI/CD log:
Selecting previously unselected package php-common.
(Reading database ...
(Reading database ... 5%
(R
From: The Wanderer
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2022 12:29:54 -0400
> The filesystem that's on the device when it's shipped from the factory
> is almost certainly already configured in this way. My understanding is
> that that is usually what is meant by saying that the "factory format"
> of a flash
On Tue, Aug 02, 2022 at 05:07:06PM -0700, pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
[...]
> 8 x 10^9 bytes / 1.6 x 10^7 sectors
> ~= 8/16 x 10^3 bytes/sector
> ~= 512 bytes/sector.
> A familiar old number.
>
> Gparted also shows 4.00 MiB unallocated bytes at the front of the
> device.
This is gparted's d
38 matches
Mail list logo
