On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 11:57:08PM +0100, mmdebmail2...@marwedels.de wrote:
[...]
> I think is clearly png [...]
[...]
> I got so far as cache_get_mime_type_for_data in glib2.0-2.58.3 in
> xdgmimecache.c not finding a proper entry [...]
I don't know (not sure I'd want to) where Gtk keeps its M
Hi,
On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 23:36:07 -0300
riveravaldez wrote:
> On 11/11/20, Felix Miata wrote:
> > Charles Curley composed on 2020-11-11 13:43 (UTC-0700):
> >
> >> Also consider a lightweight desktop such as XFCE. But I would
> >> be surprised if that solution helped.
> >
> > Why do people keep c
Hello List,
I have two drives (setup in a RAID 1 array).
The drives are mostly for archive purposes, and accessible via SMB on my
local network.
They are not constantly accessed, and performance/speed is irrelevant.
I would rather they idle/sleep when not being directly accessed. I know
they ar
You can set the sleep time in the firmware of most drives, although some
respond better than others. I've been able to set the sleep time in WD drives
but not Seagate, but both go to sleep when instructed. I have an old Iomega
ix2-200 running Arch ARM.I use 'hdparm' to instruct the drives to sle
Sorry it's 'hdparm -S' to set sleep time, not small s!
--
James B
portoteache...@fastmail.com
Em Qui, 12 Nov ʼ20, às 12:25, James B escreveu:
> You can set the sleep time in the firmware of most drives, although
> some respond better than others. I've been able to set the sleep time
> in
Hi,
another option is hd-idle package available via backports for stable and
oldstable.
On 11/12/20 1:18 PM, Thomas Anderson wrote:
Hello List,
I have two drives (setup in a RAID 1 array).
The drives are mostly for archive purposes, and accessible via SMB on my
local network.
They are not
> You can set the sleep time in the firmware of most drives, although some
> respond better than others. I've been able to set the sleep time in WD
> drives but not Seagate, but both go to sleep when instructed.
FWIW, the `hdparm -S` doesn't really work for WD drives last I checked.
More specifica
That makes sense.These WD drives I got to sleep automatically after 10m are
2013 Blue desktop drives.The firmware on new ones may behave differently.The
Seagate Barracudas in the NAS do respond to a sleep command (hdparm -y) but not
any command to change the auto sleep time - they stay spinning
> That makes sense.These WD drives I got to sleep automatically after 10m are
> 2013 Blue desktop drives.
There's a chance that you just got lucky and the time that the drive
decides to use is similar to the time you set. In any case this
behavior was not really documented anywhere so it might ha
Am 12.11.20 um 09:35 schrieb to...@tuxteam.de:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 11:57:08PM +0100, mmdebmail2...@marwedels.de wrote:
I don't know (not sure I'd want to) where Gtk keeps its MIME types
database these days. But, as a shot in the dark: have you checked
that your /etc/mime.types is sane? Wha
On 11/11/20 7:09 PM, Linux-Fan wrote:
Pentium II is old indeed. Whenever using old processors, it is important
to test if the new kernel will still support them.
So maybe I shall try some newer kernel only?
On 11/11/20 7:42 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
I have an old comp (CPU Pentium II Celeron 400 MHz, 224 MB RAM) running
ham radio server in Debian 8. It works well in CLI, but very slow after
starting GUI. I wonder whether it would be worth to try (if possible at
all) to upgrade it to Debian 9. Any ex
On 11/11/20 9:43 PM, Charles Curley wrote:
I have an old comp (CPU Pentium II Celeron 400 MHz, 224 MB RAM)
running ham radio server in Debian 8. It works well in CLI, but very
slow after starting GUI. I wonder whether it would be worth to try
(if possible at all) to upgrade it to Debian 9. Any
On 11/11/20 7:09 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
Upgrading to a newer release is not likely to make it faster. If anything,
it'll be slower (due to increased memory demands of newer software).
That's something I have already experienced with previous upgrades. But
it was always in full GUI (eithe
Miroslav Skoric composed on 2020-11-12 23:01 (UTC+0100):
> At this stage (Debian 8) I do that in MATE + Thunderbird. It's slow but
> works. What is not known is whether that would work in Debian 9.
Possibly you could boot live media 9 to find out, or if you have enough disk
space
available, ins
On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 17:40:50 +0100
Miroslav Skoric wrote:
> I have an old comp (CPU Pentium II Celeron 400 MHz, 224 MB RAM)
> running ham radio server in Debian 8. It works well in CLI, but very
> slow after starting GUI. I wonder whether it would be worth to try
> (if possible at all) to upgrade
Miroslav Skoric writes:
On 11/11/20 7:09 PM, Linux-Fan wrote:
Pentium II is old indeed. Whenever using old processors, it is important to
test if the new kernel will still support them.
So maybe I shall try some newer kernel only?
If you have an easy means to do that: Yes, I would highly r
Felix Miata writes:
Miroslav Skoric composed on 2020-11-12 23:01 (UTC+0100):
> At this stage (Debian 8) I do that in MATE + Thunderbird. It's slow but
> works. What is not known is whether that would work in Debian 9.
Possibly you could boot live media 9 to find out, or if you have enough disk
On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 23:01:19 +0100
Miroslav Skoric wrote:
> And when bootable, what GUI might be workable at best (Mate,
> Xfce, ...)? As I said, for nothing much more than occasional
> Thunderbird, or any other compatible mail client that can use the
> CLI-based ham email server (FBB), to proces
On 11/12/20 4:52 PM, Miroslav Skoric wrote:
On 11/11/20 7:42 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
I have an old comp (CPU Pentium II Celeron 400 MHz, 224 MB RAM) running
ham radio server in Debian 8. It works well in CLI, but very slow after
starting GUI. I wonder whether it would be worth to try (if po
regarding earlier post with do not reply request.
There's loads of HDDs advertised as "for CCTV, like a PC disk"
Is there some difference between HDDs for video recording and regular PC
HDDs ?
mick
--
Key ID4BFEBB31
21 matches
Mail list logo
