On 2020-02-22, Gene Heskett wrote:
>>
>> george@martha:~$ udisksctl unmount -b /dev/sdb1
>> Unmounted /dev/sdb1.
>> george@martha:~$ sudo e2fsck -c -c -k -p -f -C 0 /dev/sdb1
>> /dev/sdb1 is in use.
>> e2fsck: Cannot continue, aborting.
>>
>> Thnx,
>>
>> Mark
> Is there a user cd'd into it? That
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 11:47:22PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Friday 21 February 2020 22:58:10 Mark Allums wrote:
[...]
> > Explain this, then:
> >
> > george@martha:~$ udisksctl unmount -b /dev/sdb1
> > Unmounted /dev/sdb1.
> > george@martha:~$ sudo e2fsck -c -c -k -p -f -C 0 /dev/sdb1
> >
On 2/19/20 8:14 PM, Anastasios Lisgaras wrote:
On 2/18/20 3:45 PM, Nektarios Katakis wrote:
If you check the output of `systemctl status graphical.target` you ll see
it s a systemd target and whether it s activated or not. The related file
in `/lib/systemd/system/graphical.target` will also poi
Hello!
I have a fresh install of Buster installed in a VM. I have
the following in /etc/apt/sources.list:
deb http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ buster main
deb http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ buster-updates main
deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security buster/updates main
deb-src http://ftp
Hi.
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 12:53:38PM +, Mark Raynsford wrote:
> I've rebooted the VM several times, so it's definitely not a case of
> running the wrong kernel.
>
> # uname -a
> Linux bloodorange.int.arc7.info 4.9.0-9-amd64
And yet it is a case of running a wrong kernel.
You see, b
On 2020-02-22T16:44:18 +0300
Reco wrote:
>
> And yet it is a case of running a wrong kernel.
> You see, buster's kernel currently has version 4.19.0-8, but yours
> (4.9.0-9) looks like an outdated stretch one.
> And you do have a kernel 4.9, but you don't have the modules for it.
> You do have a k
> So either "udisksctl" is lying or something else is happening
> behind the scenes (e.g. an over-eager automounter remounting
> the file system again).
Or the /dev/sdb1 is still mounted elsewhere.
Stefan
On 2020-02-22, Mark Allums wrote:
>>
>> But does not require superuser, if udisks2 mounted it on your user's
>> behalf in the first place.
>>
>>
> Explain this, then:
>
> george@martha:~$ udisksctl unmount -b /dev/sdb1
> Unmounted /dev/sdb1.
> george@martha:~$ sudo e2fsck -c -c -k -p -f -C 0 /d
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 02:03:55PM +, Mark Raynsford wrote:
> On 2020-02-22T16:44:18 +0300
> Reco wrote:
> >
> > And yet it is a case of running a wrong kernel.
> > You see, buster's kernel currently has version 4.19.0-8, but yours
> > (4.9.0-9) looks like an outdated stretch one.
> > And you
I've discovered what the problem was...
On 2020-02-22T17:39:05 +0300
Reco wrote:
>
> A leftover from an old installation maybe?
It's a new VM, but this actually _was_ the problem, amusingly. I had
the following in the bhyve device.map:
(hd0) /dev/zvol/storage/vm/peppermint/disk1
(cd0) /storage/
On Saturday, February 22, 2020 09:42:32 AM Mark Raynsford wrote:
> It's a new VM, but this actually _was_ the problem, amusingly. I had
> the following in the bhyve device.map:
I sometimes get too curious, but is bhyve a typo, or something real? (I tried
locate on my system, didn't find anything
On 2020-02-22T10:27:41 -0500
rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Saturday, February 22, 2020 09:42:32 AM Mark Raynsford wrote:
> > It's a new VM, but this actually _was_ the problem, amusingly. I had
> > the following in the bhyve device.map:
>
> I sometimes get too curious, but is bhyve a typo, or
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 09:29:51AM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > So either "udisksctl" is lying or something else is happening
> > behind the scenes (e.g. an over-eager automounter remounting
> > the file system again).
>
> Or the /dev/sdb1 is still mounted elsewhere.
twice? (it was just umoun
Hello!
Attempting to install chromium results in the following:
# apt install chromium
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required:
fgetty getty-run
Use 'sudo apt a
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 04:02:16PM +, Mark Raynsford wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Attempting to install chromium results in the following:
>
> # apt install chromium
I had a similar situation with firefox wanting to install systemd.
Just for kicks, try
apt install chromium sysvinit-core
If that
On 2020-02-22T17:08:48 +0100
wrote:
> I had a similar situation with firefox wanting to install systemd.
>
> Just for kicks, try
>
> apt install chromium sysvinit-core
>
> If that works, you'd perhaps want to adapt your apt-preferences
> (either pushing sysvinit-core or lowering systemd).
>
Hi Mark,
Quoting Mark Raynsford (2020-02-22 17:24:01)
> On 2020-02-22T17:08:48 +0100
> wrote:
> > I had a similar situation with firefox wanting to install systemd.
> >
> > Just for kicks, try
> >
> > apt install chromium sysvinit-core
> >
> > If that works, you'd perhaps want to adapt your
'Ello.
On 2020-02-22T17:32:59 +0100
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
> Maybe you have... held broken packages?
>
> If you use aptitude instead of apt, then you can step through more
> options, including options involving downgrading (which is unsupported
> by Debian, but since your system is already
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 04:24:01PM +, Mark Raynsford wrote:
> On 2020-02-22T17:08:48 +0100
> wrote:
> > I had a similar situation with firefox wanting to install systemd.
> >
> > Just for kicks, try
> >
> > apt install chromium sysvinit-core
> >
> > If that works, you'd perhaps want to ad
Hi,
Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > Or the /dev/sdb1 is still mounted elsewhere.
to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> twice? (it was just umounted once, [...]
Own experience with Debian 10.0 Live:
There are two mount points of /dev/sda1 reported.
The mount point
/usr/lib/live/mount/medium
can be unmounted.
The
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 05:39:00PM +0100, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > > Or the /dev/sdb1 is still mounted elsewhere.
>
> to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > twice? (it was just umounted once, [...]
>
> Own experience with Debian 10.0 Live:
> There are two mount points of /d
On 2020-02-22T17:39:15 +0100
to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> Not all is lost... for some reason your system thinks you don't want
> to install libgtk-3.0 (I'm assuming you're "on" stable). Just add
> that to your install list. If it doesn't conflict with something else,
> that might work.
>
> Cheers
>
Hi,
to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> but udisksctl (or however it's called) said "all is well",
> so it must be either lying -- or someone else quicly mounted
> things after that.
There is obvious need for a special distro for age-wise challenged
people like me. Or at least some online AI which navigate
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 04:51:01PM +, Mark Raynsford wrote:
> On 2020-02-22T17:39:15 +0100
> to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> >
> > Not all is lost [...]
> Thanks! I was about to try that, but it seems that aptitude found an
> alternative solution. Firstly, "# aptitude install chromium" said:
Great
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 05:53:07PM +0100, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > but udisksctl (or however it's called) said "all is well",
> > so it must be either lying -- or someone else quicly mounted
> > things after that.
>
> There is obvious need for a special distro f
Quoting Mark Raynsford (2020-02-22 17:38:20)
> 'Ello.
>
> On 2020-02-22T17:32:59 +0100
> Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >
> > Maybe you have... held broken packages?
> >
> > If you use aptitude instead of apt, then you can step through more
> > options, including options involving downgrading (which
On Saturday 22 February 2020 12:03:41 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 05:53:07PM +0100, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > > but udisksctl (or however it's called) said "all is well",
> > > so it must be either lying -- or someone else quicly mounte
Le samedi 22 février 2020 11:50:05 UTC+1, Anastasios Lisgaras a écrit :
> On 2/19/20 8:14 PM, Anastasios Lisgaras wrote:
[...]
> > How do I see if my hardware needs
> > a particular firmware to work properly?
For the hardware already known to the kernel, the later will try to load a
firmware whe
On 2/22/20 8:05 PM, didier.gau...@gmail.com wrote:
Le samedi 22 février 2020 11:50:05 UTC+1, Anastasios Lisgaras a écrit :
For the hardware already known to the kernel, the later will try to load a firmware
when needed. So a search of the 'firmware" word in the kernel logs would show
either su
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 01:22:38PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
[...]
> I dunno, I've got years on you, and I'm not half done with what I need to
> do yet.
If everything's done before one leaves, then it gets boring, doesn't it?
> What I like to find is a government that uses our Constitution, a
Hi,
I have a 4K laptop in a 12" package with Intel HD520. I have been running
Debian 7 and Debian 8 on it for a while and now I have updated to Debian 10.
I'm sure that you already have an idea of the issue - the console fonts on
4k are tiny, barely usable even at 32px ( does anyone know why setf
Le samedi 22 février 2020 20:30:04 UTC+1, Anastasios Lisgaras a écrit :
[...]
> I think all is well, isn't it?
> Because the last line worries me a little.
> > [14666.667585] ACPI: [Firmware Bug]: BIOS _OSI(Linux) query ignored
Yes, all the needed firmwares seem to be present.
Explanation of the
Alex Yuriev composed on 2020-02-22 15:57 (UTC-0500):
> I have a 4K laptop in a 12" package with Intel HD520. I have been running
> Debian 7 and Debian 8 on it for a while and now I have updated to Debian 10.
> I'm sure that you already have an idea of the issue - the console fonts on
> 4k are tin
On Saturday 22 February 2020 14:55:45 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 01:22:38PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > I dunno, I've got years on you, and I'm not half done with what I
> > need to do yet.
>
> If everything's done before one leaves, then it gets boring, doesn
On 2/22/20 11:45 PM, didier.gau...@gmail.com wrote:
Le samedi 22 février 2020 20:30:04 UTC+1, Anastasios Lisgaras a écrit :
Yes, all the needed firmwares seem to be present.
Explanation of the 'bug' above is here:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69921
Nice, thank you for the infor
Hello,
Are you looking for stunning and high-quality new office furniture? Maybe
you've just moved into a new office or your existing furniture is looking a bit
out dated?
MSK Installation Ltd has the solution for every office.
We have an extensive selection of office furniture - Ranging fro
36 matches
Mail list logo
