On 10.01.19 00:51, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Why did you flag the SSD as write-mostly ? I would have expected the
> opposite.
Oh Sorry I understand this option in a wrong way.
Ok, I will try TRIM on LVM.
Thanks a lot.
On 2019-01-06, Brian wrote:
>
> Thank you for your persistence. I was beginning to think your Firefox
> was not from Debian. It appears the feature you describe has disappeared
> from it in more recent versions:
>
> https://www.ghacks.net/2018/05/21/firefox-62-developer-toolbar-removal/
>
It woul
In another forum there was a discussion comparing execution times of
some different programs accomplishing the same task. The programs were
being run on different machines.
As part of the discussion the use of "grep MHz /proc/cpuinfo" was
suggested. That prompted me to investigate the /proc di
Hi.
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 05:54:45AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> Is there somewhere that catalogs the function of the various "files" under
> that directory? What are the functions of the sub-directories with a numeric
> name?
Choose any:
proc(5).
filesystems/proc.txt.gz from the
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 06:45:22PM -0600, David Wright wrote:
So, looking at the OP, is the order of sdc a temporary state of
affairs, produced by adding partitions to sdc while sde is plugged in
and blocking the sequence? (I've never seen one letter split.)
Or is it quite normal when you reac
On 01/10/2019 06:07 AM, Reco wrote:
Hi.
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 05:54:45AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
Is there somewhere that catalogs the function of the various "files" under that
directory? What are the functions of the sub-directories with a numeric name?
Choose any:
proc(5).
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 02:44:01AM -0500, Kenneth Parker wrote:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2019/01/msg00328.html
snip
So what is occurring now? I hope I'm not supposed to "Dumb Myself Down".
snip
I can't see a new question here from your old one. Rather than dilute
responses acros
On Sat, Jan 05, 2019 at 09:33:27AM -0500, Kenneth Parker wrote:
I first need to Date Myself
You don't, really: all it serves is to worsen the signal:noise ratio of
your email pertinent to the problem you are experiencing.
One "Special Function", which pointed out the "Fly in the Ointment" to
Dear Debian users,
Recently I switched from QubesOS to Debian. The reason for this (just in
case anyone wants to know) is because it was hard to combine the OS with
the work I have to do for my school. While installing Debian I choose to
use the following partition scheme:
nvme0n1
On my stretch system, I just upgraded remmina to 1.2.32 using
stretch-backports. It works fine except now many of the toolbar icons
show [X] as if they're are missing.
Some are OK, such as Tools, Preferences, Screenshot. Missing ones are:
Resize, Toggle Fullscreen, Switch Tabs, Toggle Scaled M
On Sunday 06 January 2019 12:56:14 Brian wrote:
> On Sun 06 Jan 2019 at 12:15:09 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > > > screenshot filename.png --fullpage
> >
> > Humm:
> > gene@coyote:~/linuxcnc/nc_files$ sudo apt-get install screenshot
> > Reading package lists... Done
> > Building d
Hi Reco,
works perfectly as you decribe for me.
Many thanks
Rainer
Am Donnerstag, 10. Januar 2019, 05:41:49 CET schrieb Reco:
> Hi.
>
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 11:09:58PM +0100, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a system with two network interfaces, connecting to two subnets.
>
Pieter Lems wrote:
> What is the reason this was automaticly done?
> Does this have any negative influence on the security of my /boot
> partition? How can I counter this?
> And if it's possible to counter this, would it be profitable (in case of
> security) to counter it?
Not sure but I think /b
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 07:28:04PM +, Pieter Lems wrote:
As you can see there is a /boot and a /boot/efi partition. I was wondering
the following things:
What is the reason this was automaticly done?
The system is set up to boot vie (U)EFI. The EFI boot volume must be
FAT32, so /boot/efi is
Building a new UEFI system to supplant my "showing its age" 12 year old
non-UEFI, MBR-only system, and don't want to do a clean install of
Stretch. Cloning drive and converting to GPT is out. I want only to
migrate the Stretch install out of the others there. Any links
or suggestions as to the b
Hi all,
This machine is taking ages to boot.
It's a fresh install.
According to dmesg, this is where it appears to hang:
[2.717311] device-mapper: uevent: version 1.0.3
[2.717398] device-mapper: ioctl: 4.35.0-ioctl (2016-06-23)
initialised: dm-d
e...@redhat.com
[2.978281] clocksourc
On 4/01/19 2:48 PM, Richard Hector wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is one of those annoying cases where I claim "It was working, and I
> didn't do anything, and now it doesn't" - suspicious, I know ...
>
> In this case, I can see from my emails that this machine booted (via
> wake-on-lan from a cronjob
Richard Hector composed on 2019-01-11 14:03 (UTC+1300):
> This machine is taking ages to boot.
> It's a fresh install.
> According to dmesg, this is where it appears to hang:
> [2.717311] device-mapper: uevent: version 1.0.3
> [2.717398] device-mapper: ioctl: 4.35.0-ioctl (2016-06-23)
>
On 11/01/19 3:27 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
> Richard Hector composed on 2019-01-11 14:03 (UTC+1300):
>
>> This machine is taking ages to boot.
>
>> It's a fresh install.
>
>> According to dmesg, this is where it appears to hang:
>
>> [2.717311] device-mapper: uevent: version 1.0.3
>> [2.71
Richard Hector composed on 2019-01-11 16:54 (UTC+1300):
...
> So either there's something else unlogged happening between, or there's
> parallelism happening. Either way, I'm not sure where to look next :-(
> Hints on where to look for the boot sequence in the kernel source, perhaps?
Maybe pasteb
David Wright composed on 2019-01-09 14:26 (UTC-0600):
> On Fri 04 Jan 2019 at 19:36:42 (-0500), Felix Miata wrote:
>> Yes, when filling the disk at the outset. With the escalation of disk sizes
>> over the years, it's
>> become more common not to allocate 100% at the outset. In non-ancient memor
Patrick Bartek wrote:
>
> Building a new UEFI system to supplant my "showing its age" 12 year old
> non-UEFI, MBR-only system, and don't want to do a clean install of
> Stretch. Cloning drive and converting to GPT is out. I want only to
> migrate the Stretch install out of the others there. Any
22 matches
Mail list logo
