Re: basilisk-browser

2018-10-19 Thread mick crane
On 2018-10-19 07:58, Dominik George wrote: > [1] https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip/issues/86 Seriously? They forbid linking against libraries if their code is not shipped with their sources? That also seems like a security nightmare in the making. Mozilla themselves weren't even *that*

Re: basilisk-browser

2018-10-19 Thread Reco
Hi. On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 08:58:07AM +0200, Dominik George wrote: > >> > [1] https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip/issues/86 > > Seriously? They forbid linking against libraries if their code is not shipped > with their sources? > > That also seems like a security nightmare in the m

Re: basilisk-browser

2018-10-19 Thread Reco
Hi. On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 08:26:20AM +0100, mick crane wrote: > On 2018-10-19 07:58, Dominik George wrote: > > > > > [1] https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip/issues/86 > > > > Seriously? They forbid linking against libraries if their code is not > > shipped with their sources? > > >

Re: basilisk-browser

2018-10-19 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 19 October 2018 00:24:43 Ben Finney wrote: > Doug writes: > > On 10/18/2018 04:49 AM, Reco wrote: > > > Palemoon means extremely hostile upstream - [1]. > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip/issues/86 > > > > I would like to know what you mean by "extremely hostile ups

Re: basilisk-browser

2018-10-19 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 19 October 2018 03:26:20 mick crane wrote: > On 2018-10-19 07:58, Dominik George wrote: > >>> > [1] https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip/issues/86 > > > > Seriously? They forbid linking against libraries if their code is > > not shipped with their sources? > > > > That also seems like

Re: basilisk-browser

2018-10-19 Thread mick crane
On 2018-10-19 11:23, Reco wrote: Hi. On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 08:26:20AM +0100, mick crane wrote: On 2018-10-19 07:58, Dominik George wrote: > > > > [1] https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip/issues/86 > > Seriously? They forbid linking against libraries if their code is not > shipped with thei

masqmail error

2018-10-19 Thread Pierre Frenkiel
hi, after a system upgrade, I'm no more able to send mails with masqmail. my masqmail.conf contains lines like online_routes.gmail_gmail = "/etc/masqmail/gmail_gmail.route" Nevetheless, I get error messages like this one: var 'online_routes.gmail_gmail' not (yet) known, ignored has anybody

Re: basilisk-browser

2018-10-19 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 12:28:16PM +0300, Reco wrote: > > Ridiculous or not, but stable's firefox-esr contains their own private > version of NSS - [1]. Same for the thunderbird. > But they try to keep it sane, so at least firefox does not embed > 'correct' version of GTK3, for example. > That i

Why does sound encoded with mencoder crackle in debian stretch but not in buster?

2018-10-19 Thread Markus Grunwald
I'm transcoding some TV Series with mencoder. I wrote a script where the core is: mencoder 1.ts -o 1.avi -passlogfile /tmp/tmp.VQ6WZm1tSo/pass.log -demuxer lavf -nosub -vf softskip,harddup -aspect 16:9 -aid 0 -oac lavc -lavcopts acodec=ac3:abitrate=128 -ovc x264 -x264encopts pass=1:bitrate

Re: Why does sound encoded with mencoder crackle in debian stretch but not in buster?

2018-10-19 Thread Dan Ritter
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 04:09:19PM +0200, Markus Grunwald wrote: > I'm transcoding some TV Series with mencoder. I wrote a script where the > core is: > > mencoder 1.ts -o 1.avi -passlogfile /tmp/tmp.VQ6WZm1tSo/pass.log > -demuxer lavf -nosub -vf softskip,harddup -aspect 16:9 -aid 0 -oac l

Re: Why does sound encoded with mencoder crackle in debian stretch but not in buster?

2018-10-19 Thread Markus Grunwald
Hello Dan, > Does > -oac copy > do the same thing? No, that works! Strange. -- Markus Grunwald https://www.the-grue.de/~markus/markus_grunwald.gpg

An appropriate directory search tool?

2018-10-19 Thread Richard Owlett
The "MATE Search Tool" comes close. It can: Select a starting directory. Search for a specific extension. Search for a keyword in file content. It cannot: Search ONLY the specified directory. Return files that DO NOT contain a keyword. I suspect what I want would most likely be what

Re: An appropriate directory search tool?

2018-10-19 Thread Andy Smith
Hello, On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 10:00:25AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > The "MATE Search Tool" comes close. > > It can: > Select a starting directory. > Search for a specific extension. > Search for a keyword in file content. > > It cannot: >Search ONLY the specified directory. >R

Re: An appropriate directory search tool?

2018-10-19 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 10:00:25AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > The "MATE Search Tool" comes close. > > It can: > Select a starting directory. > Search for a specific extension. > Search for a keyword in file content. > > It cannot: >Search ONLY the specified directory. >Return fi

Re: An appropriate directory search tool?

2018-10-19 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 11:12:30AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 10:00:25AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > > The "MATE Search Tool" comes close. > > > > It can: > > Select a starting directory. > > Search for a specific extension. > > Search for a keyword in file

Re: An appropriate directory search tool?

2018-10-19 Thread tomas
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 10:00:25AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > The "MATE Search Tool" comes close. > > It can: > Select a starting directory. > Search for a specific extension. > Search for a keyword in file content. > > It cannot: >Search ONLY the specified directory. >Return fi

Re: An appropriate directory search tool?

2018-10-19 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 05:21:30PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > This would be 'find' (ok, with some little help from 'grep'). Hands down. > > The man page can be a bit... intimidating, so I'd suggest to begin with > little examples and return to the man page from time to time until you > got t

Re: Why does sound encoded with mencoder crackle in debian stretch but not in buster?

2018-10-19 Thread Dan Ritter
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 04:48:17PM +0200, Markus Grunwald wrote: > Hello Dan, > > > Does > > -oac copy > > do the same thing? > No, that works! > > Strange. No, no, it means that you have successfully identified the source of the problem as being ffmpeg's audio conversion. On the other hand, it

Re: An appropriate directory search tool?

2018-10-19 Thread tomas
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 11:29:13AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 05:21:30PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > This would be 'find' (ok, with some little help from 'grep'). Hands down. > > > > The man page can be a bit... intimidating [...] > There's also

Re: An appropriate directory search tool?

2018-10-19 Thread David Wright
On Fri 19 Oct 2018 at 10:00:25 (-0500), Richard Owlett wrote: > The "MATE Search Tool" comes close. > > It can: > Select a starting directory. > Search for a specific extension. > Search for a keyword in file content. > > It cannot: >Search ONLY the specified directory. >Return file

Re: An appropriate directory search tool?

2018-10-19 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 10:48:42AM -0500, David Wright wrote: > find . -type f -exec chmod a-wx {} \; For this one, you probably want to replace \; with + to get the efficiency boost, which would be pretty significant here. You probably wrote this one a long time ago. > find . -type f | while re

Re: Mate Main menu question

2018-10-19 Thread songbird
J.W. Foster wrote: ... > I have the stable Mate desktop installed along with Gnome. The main menu do= > es not show any applications. It occurred after an update some time ago. I = > simply prefer the Mate desktop tpo=C2=A0Gnome. Anyon know how to get the ap= > plications into the main menu??Thanks

Re: An appropriate directory search tool?

2018-10-19 Thread songbird
Richard Owlett wrote: ... > I suspect what I want would most likely be what I'm looking for. > "ls" can search by extension and stay in specified directory. > It cannot include/exclude keywords. > > My immediate problem involves only a couple dozen files so manual search > is feasible. > > Suggest

firefox palemoon waterfox baselisk problem, not on chromium

2018-10-19 Thread arne
Hi, While browsing on stock updated Debian stretch I get several times a day: Secure Connection Failed The connection to www.google.com was interrupted while the page was loading. The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because the authenticity of the received data could not be verified

Re: basilisk-browser

2018-10-19 Thread Ben Finney
Dominik George writes: > >> > [1] https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip/issues/86 > > Seriously? They forbid linking against libraries if their code is not > shipped with their sources? They don't forbid that. What they forbid is redistributing the modified work with the Pale Moon branding.

perl; Trying to get File::stat to work

2018-10-19 Thread Martin McCormick
I am a member of a perl discussion list but it seems to have gone away so I hope somebody here can give me an idea as to why the stat function is not working. Create a file called testfile in your working directory and then run the following perl script: #!/usr/bin/perl -w use strict; use

Re: basilisk-browser

2018-10-19 Thread fmneto
On 2018-10-19 23:19, Ben Finney wrote: Dominik George writes: >> > [1] https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip/issues/86 Seriously? They forbid linking against libraries if their code is not shipped with their sources? They don't forbid that. What they forbid is redistributing the modified

Re: perl; Trying to get File::stat to work

2018-10-19 Thread Bob McGowan
It looks like this has to do with mixing the usage of the "native" stat of Perl with the "object" version from File::stat. The 'stat' from File::stat returns a reference to an object, which has the stuff you're wanting, tucked away internally as object variables.  You need to do:     use Fil

Re: firefox palemoon waterfox baselisk problem, not on chromium

2018-10-19 Thread Reco
Hi. On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 02:16:57AM +0200, arne wrote: > By-passed my proxies, did not help. > > Those sites all load OK in Chromium, but I do not like this browser. > > Strange thing, when I retry 2-80 times the pages get loaded. > > I use Tab Mix Plus Mozilla add-on to reload every