Re: More info - was [Re: Synaptic fails to fix broken packages]

2018-10-05 Thread Richard Owlett
On 10/04/2018 11:10 PM, mick crane wrote: On 2018-10-04 18:27, Glenn English wrote: On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 2:06 PM Richard Owlett wrote: Just did a fresh install to another partition of the machine on which I observed the current problem. Installation was from DVD 1 of Debian 9.1.0 Again Li

Re: More info - was [Re: Synaptic fails to fix broken packages]

2018-10-05 Thread Reco
Hi. On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 04:57:36AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > On 10/04/2018 11:10 PM, mick crane wrote: > > On 2018-10-04 18:27, Glenn English wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 2:06 PM Richard Owlett wrote: > > > > > > > Just did a fresh install to another partition of the mach

WPA error: TLS Alert write:fatal:protocol version

2018-10-05 Thread Pétùr
Le 03/10/2018 à 16:35, Dominik George a écrit : > >> I tried to add "phase1="tls_disable_tlsv1_2=1"" (see below the complete >> wpa_supplicant configuration. > That leaves you with only TLS 1.3, then ;). Ok :-) > You probably want to set tls_disable_tlsv1_1=0 instead, but I did not try > (becau

commit=value in fstab is ignored

2018-10-05 Thread Bhasker C V
Hi, I have this entry in fstab /dev/mapper/vg0-opt /opt btrfs rw,discard,relatime,commit=120 0 0 but after a reboot I see /dev/mapper/vg0-opt on /opt type btrfs (rw,relatime,discard,space_cache, *commit=360*,subvolid=5,subvol=/) Am I missing something? is it not sufficient? to give commit=360

openssl 1.1.1-1: bug?

2018-10-05 Thread Pétùr
Hi, I cannot connect to WPA2 Entreprise network (PEAP + MSCHAPv2) with openssl 1.1.1-1 (in sid today). I can connect 1.1.0f-3+deb9u2 version (stable). Is it a bug in openssl 1.1.1-1 or some kind of incompatibility between openssl 1.1.1-1 and my radius server? The error log with the 1.1.1-1 versi

Re: openssl 1.1.1-1: bug?

2018-10-05 Thread Reco
Hi. On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 12:41:44PM +0200, Pétùr wrote: > Hi, > > I cannot connect to WPA2 Entreprise network (PEAP + MSCHAPv2) with > openssl 1.1.1-1 (in sid today). I can connect 1.1.0f-3+deb9u2 version > (stable). > > Is it a bug in openssl 1.1.1-1 or some kind of incompatibility b

Re: More info - was [Re: Synaptic fails to fix broken packages]

2018-10-05 Thread Richard Owlett
On 10/05/2018 05:06 AM, Reco wrote: Hi. On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 04:57:36AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: On 10/04/2018 11:10 PM, mick crane wrote: On 2018-10-04 18:27, Glenn English wrote: On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 2:06 PM Richard Owlett wrote: Just did a fresh install to another parti

Re: More info - was [Re: Synaptic fails to fix broken packages]

2018-10-05 Thread rhkramer
On Friday, October 05, 2018 06:06:25 AM Reco wrote: > On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 04:57:36AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > > Can someone point me to a discussion of why one would chose a particular > > option? > > Why do you need a discussion of that if you have apt-get(8)? > > upgrade is used to i

Re: More info - was [Re: Synaptic fails to fix broken packages]

2018-10-05 Thread Reco
Hi. On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 05:51:09AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > > > I'm not comfortable with anything other than "stable". > > > When moving from one release to the next my custom is to purchase a DVD > > > set and do a complete fresh install. > > > > > > However, I *am* several po

Apper problem in Jessie

2018-10-05 Thread rhkramer
apper on Jessie doesn't work for me: It starts up, tells me it has packages to upgrade, allows me to press the "Apply" button, but does not give me an opportunity to enter the root password but tells me that it doesn't have the privileges to install those packages. (apper on Wheezy prompts me

Re: More info - was [Re: Synaptic fails to fix broken packages]

2018-10-05 Thread Reco
Hi. On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 07:03:13AM -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > On Friday, October 05, 2018 06:06:25 AM Reco wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 04:57:36AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > > > > Can someone point me to a discussion of why one would chose a particular > > > option?

Re: More info - was [Re: Synaptic fails to fix broken packages]

2018-10-05 Thread Joe
On Fri, 5 Oct 2018 04:57:36 -0500 Richard Owlett wrote: > > Can someone point me to a discussion of why one would chose a > particular option? > The important difference is that 'upgrade' (aptitude safe-upgrade) will not remove a package without replacing it with a more up-to-date version of

Re: all files moved to lost+found

2018-10-05 Thread Beco
Dear linux users, The memtest86+ came out clean. I run out of ideas to what was the problem. Wasn't it a very serious problem I would already stop writing emails. But to have the whole /home disappear, is something that changes your expectations for the whole linux experience. It has to have a

Re: all files moved to lost+found

2018-10-05 Thread Beco
On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 at 01:07, Abdullah Ramazanoğlu wrote: > > But the journal is passing through on-disk controller, too. If the drive is > mishandling its on-drive cache, then an FS corruption is still possible. > Even > if journal writes are "direct", the drive could be ignoring that (i.e. > cac

Re: (solved) Re: is it possible to install previous mplayer

2018-10-05 Thread Li Wei
i've just installed jessie, its main hasn't mencoder so i install wheezy's mencoder, it has no problem

Re: all files moved to lost+found

2018-10-05 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 05 October 2018 08:53:14 Beco wrote: > Dear linux users, > > The memtest86+ came out clean. > > I run out of ideas to what was the problem. > > Wasn't it a very serious problem I would already stop writing emails. > But to have the whole /home disappear, is something that changes your >

dual port cross over cable bonding

2018-10-05 Thread Adam Weremczuk
Hello, I have 2 servers running Proxmox 5.2 (based on Debian 9). I've connected Ethernet ports between them with a pair of cross over cables. When only 1 port on each and 1 cable are used connectivity looks fine with the following config: -

Re: dual port cross over cable bonding

2018-10-05 Thread Dan Ritter
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 03:14:15PM +0100, Adam Weremczuk wrote: > Hello, > > I have 2 servers running Proxmox 5.2 (based on Debian 9). > > I've connected Ethernet ports between them with a pair of cross over cables. > > When only 1 port on each and 1 cable are used connectivity looks fine with >

Re: dual port cross over cable bonding

2018-10-05 Thread Dan Ritter
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 03:45:14PM +0100, Adam Weremczuk wrote: > Yes, 192.168.200.1 and 192.168.200.2 netmask 30 > All ports and cables work when tested 1-1 but not with my 2-2 bonding > config. > > > Looks like your LACP is correct but your IP addressing is wrong. > > > > Do you have parenthese

Re: dual port cross over cable bonding

2018-10-05 Thread Dan Ritter
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 10:46:15AM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote: > On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 03:45:14PM +0100, Adam Weremczuk wrote: > > Yes, 192.168.200.1 and 192.168.200.2 netmask 30 > > All ports and cables work when tested 1-1 but not with my 2-2 bonding > > config. > > > > > Looks like your LACP is

Re: dual port cross over cable bonding

2018-10-05 Thread Adam Weremczuk
Yes, 192.168.200.1 and 192.168.200.2 netmask 30 All ports and cables work when tested 1-1 but not with my 2-2 bonding config. Looks like your LACP is correct but your IP addressing is wrong. Do you have parentheses in it, or are you trying to suggest that one is .1 and the other is .2? -dsr-

Re: More info - was [Re: Synaptic fails to fix broken packages]

2018-10-05 Thread rhkramer
On Friday, October 05, 2018 07:25:29 AM Reco wrote: > On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 07:03:13AM -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > > Can someone describe (or point to) a description of how dist-upgrade > > determines the more important app? (Oh, I'm guessing it has to do with > > the whatever it is calle

Re: dual port cross over cable bonding

2018-10-05 Thread Dan Purgert
Adam Weremczuk wrote: > Hello, > > I have 2 servers running Proxmox 5.2 (based on Debian 9). > > I've connected Ethernet ports between them with a pair of cross over > cables. Are these "just" 10/100 cards? I mean, if they're gbit capable, crossover cables violate the spec, and you're limiting th

Re: dual port cross over cable bonding

2018-10-05 Thread Reco
Hi. On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 03:14:15PM +0100, Adam Weremczuk wrote: > Hello, > > I have 2 servers running Proxmox 5.2 (based on Debian 9). Have you considered using OpenVSwitch for the task? > I've connected Ethernet ports between them with a pair of cross over cables. Ok. > iface e

[SOLVED] Re: dual port cross over cable bonding

2018-10-05 Thread Adam Weremczuk
My config was ok and it's working like a charm after both servers have been rebooted. For some reason "systemctl restart networking" wasn't enough.

Re: apt 101 (was: Re: More info)

2018-10-05 Thread Reco
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 11:03:31AM -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > On Friday, October 05, 2018 07:25:29 AM Reco wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 07:03:13AM -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > > > Can someone describe (or point to) a description of how dist-upgrade > > > determines the more impo

[SOLVED] Re: dual port cross over cable bonding

2018-10-05 Thread Adam Weremczuk
A single dual port gigabit card on each server. I'm more concerned about performance than redundancy. The bond operates in 2 gigabit mode: ethtool bond1 (...)     Speed: 2000Mb/s     Duplex: Full (...) My working config (will play with it a bit more): auto bond1 iface bond1 inet static     sl

Re: apt 101 (was: Re: More info)

2018-10-05 Thread rhkramer
Ok, thanks for the followup, that is helpful! It will probably take me sleeping on it to let it completely sink in. My current summary to myself is to avoid using dist-upgrade unless I have some special reason and really know what I'm doing. ;-) On Friday, October 05, 2018 11:35:46 AM Reco w

workbench configuratio

2018-10-05 Thread Muzhgan Athaee
i installed workbench but i have faced with some problems please help. tamat@tamat-VGN-FW41J-H:~$ sudo nano /etc/mysql/mysql.conf.d/mysqld.cnf tamat@tamat-VGN-FW41J-H:~$ service mysql restart Job for mysql.service failed because the control process exited with error code. See "systemctl status my

Re: Installing Debian On A 2011 iMac

2018-10-05 Thread JulHer
El jue, 04-10-2018 a las 04:04 -0700, Keifer Bly escribió: > Hello, so I have a 2011 iMac that I am considering installing Debian > Linux on. I am considering doing this because I cannot update Mac OS > on this computer anymore (when I try to install Mojave I get an > error message saying "could n

Re: More info - was [Re: Synaptic fails to fix broken packages]

2018-10-05 Thread Brian
On Fri 05 Oct 2018 at 11:03:31 -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > > I'm not sure I know enough to re-phrase the question. I'm also surprised / > confused to see the two tags: "Essential: yes" and "Priority: required" -- I > presume that is not redundant information, but at first glance it seems

Re: More info - was [Re: Synaptic fails to fix broken packages]

2018-10-05 Thread rhkramer
On Friday, October 05, 2018 03:40:09 PM Brian wrote: > On Fri 05 Oct 2018 at 11:03:31 -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > > I'm not sure I know enough to re-phrase the question. I'm also surprised > > / confused to see the two tags: "Essential: yes" and "Priority: > > required" -- I presume that is

(Debian) USB Audio interface makes terrible noises

2018-10-05 Thread Mask The Truth God
Hi ive asked this on multiple different sites and still no replies so ill try and see if anyone knows here. as i have just recently switched to debian i have most things sorted out however, I cannot figure out this problem. I have a M-Audio MobilePre usb audio interface ive been using for years

Re: (Debian) USB Audio interface makes terrible noises

2018-10-05 Thread deloptes
Mask The Truth God wrote: > Hi ive asked this on multiple different sites and still no replies so ill > try and see if anyone knows here. > > as i have just recently switched to debian i have most things sorted out > however, I cannot figure out this problem. I have a M-Audio MobilePre usb > audi

Re: workbench configuratio

2018-10-05 Thread Ulf Volmer
On 06/10/2018 02:07, Muzhgan Athaee wrote: > -- Support: http://www.ubuntu.com/support Are you sure that you have chosen the right mailing list? best regards Ulf

Re: More info - was [Re: Synaptic fails to fix broken packages]

2018-10-05 Thread Brian
On Fri 05 Oct 2018 at 16:17:22 -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > On Friday, October 05, 2018 03:40:09 PM Brian wrote: > > On Fri 05 Oct 2018 at 11:03:31 -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > > > I'm not sure I know enough to re-phrase the question. I'm also surprised > > > / confused to see the two

Re: Installing Debian On A 2011 iMac

2018-10-05 Thread Stefan Monnier
>> probably do not support the hardware anymore). As new versions of Mac >> OS are no longer supported on this computer, would it be possible to >> install Debian Linux as the default OS on this machine Without a doubt. Have you tried and encountered problems? A trivial search for "install debian

Ettiquite/Required readings on contacting Maintainers/Packagers

2018-10-05 Thread Austin LaBerta
I had recently updated to sid and found myself a little confundled when i noticed the ranger package was still 9 releases out of date and running on python2. What are some things I should check prior to telling the maintainer to "please update this"?

Re: Ettiquite/Required readings on contacting Maintainers/Packagers

2018-10-05 Thread Brian
On Fri 05 Oct 2018 at 17:32:17 -0500, Austin LaBerta wrote: > I had recently updated to sid and found myself a little confundled when > i noticed the ranger package was still 9 releases out of date and > running on python2. What are some things I should check prior to > telling the maintainer to "

Re: More info - was [Re: Synaptic fails to fix broken packages]

2018-10-05 Thread David Wright
On Fri 05 Oct 2018 at 22:36:48 (+0100), Brian wrote: > On Fri 05 Oct 2018 at 16:17:22 -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Friday, October 05, 2018 03:40:09 PM Brian wrote: > > > I've lost track. Are you using dist-upgrade on stable or unstable? > > > > I'm not the OP, but the place where I pl