On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 03:31:54PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Friday 08 December 2017 14:26:41 Jonathan Dowland wrote:
No objection there, and I agree that the release notes should probably
have covered the policy changes. That ship has now sailed
unfortunately.
So now, no effort will ever
On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 07:57:03PM +, Brian wrote:
That's a good point.
Not really. systemd doesn't stop providing a single place to define a
consistent policy because a set of users do not use it.
That's not the point I thought was good: the point is, in Debian,
systemd is optional. As a
On Sat, Dec 09, 2017 at 01:30:17AM +, Glenn English wrote:
Even if there's an error in the release note? Less than optimal way to
run a train.
Errors and omissions are different things. I'm not responsible for
release notes but I suspect if there was something that was glaringly
false, it *
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 05:04:51PM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> tomas writes:
> > Not a fan of systemd here (have outed myself this way clearly enough,
> > I think), but systemd is pretty well documented, for sure.
>
> Is the Debian default configurati
On Sat, 09 Dec 2017 01:46:59 +
Mark Fletcher wrote:
> The OP has never been seen again since the original post. Just
> sayin’...
>
>
Because he accidentally discovered a new feature, thought it was a bug,
and was immediately corrected. End of story.
We've been discussing the 'accidentally'
On Sat 09 Dec 2017 at 07:52:56 +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 07:57:03PM +, Brian wrote:
> > > That's a good point.
> >
> > Not really. systemd doesn't stop providing a single place to define a
> > consistent policy because a set of users do not use it.
>
> That's n
On Fri, 8 Dec 2017 23:56:44 +
Brian wrote:
> On Fri 08 Dec 2017 at 23:06:00 +, Joe wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 8 Dec 2017 17:12:18 -0500
> > Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I do remember having to give a password, but I don't remember how
> > > long ago now. And I have too much ope
On Sat, 9 Dec 2017, at 01:19, Richard Hector wrote:
> Nobody else uses logcheck? Everyone is fine with how it works?
Can't say... but having never heard of it I googled it, found my way
to the project page and its mail-lists, and noticed that there's been
hardly any traffic there for years.
On
On Sat 09 Dec 2017 at 10:12:16 +, Joe wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Dec 2017 23:56:44 +
> Brian wrote:
>
> > On Fri 08 Dec 2017 at 23:06:00 +, Joe wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 8 Dec 2017 17:12:18 -0500
> > > Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I do remember having to give a password
> Screenshot [1] looks normal to me, but on screenphoto [2] I clearly see
> red-ish stripes and pink spots in the middle.
>
> Now it looks like your LCD could be faulty not PC hardware\software. Can you
> test it with another LCD monitor, or connect it to TV via HDMI cable if it's
> possible?
The
Richard Hector wrote:
> Nobody else uses logcheck? Everyone is fine with how it works?
I use logcheck on all systems and I see no need to change it. In fact, I
*want* the reboot messages and filtering them out would be a regression
for me.
Grüße,
Sven.
--
Sigmentation fault. Core dumped.
On 09.12.2017 15:37, Sven Hartge wrote:
> Richard Hector wrote:
>
>> Nobody else uses logcheck? Everyone is fine with how it works?
>
> I use logcheck on all systems and I see no need to change it. In fact, I
> *want* the reboot messages and filtering them out would be a regression
> for me.
Ag
On Sat 09 Dec 2017 at 15:35:18 (+0100), Alexandre Rossi wrote:
> > Screenshot [1] looks normal to me, but on screenphoto [2] I clearly see
> > red-ish stripes and pink spots in the middle.
> >
> > Now it looks like your LCD could be faulty not PC hardware\software. Can you
> > test it with another
On 12/08/2017 05:12 PM, Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
Something I did *not* understand when I saw it in
operation was why a password was needed at the terminal but not from
within the GUI's "Applications > Log Out" menu path.
Thank you Cindy, now I don't have to point out the obvious! :) Ric
--
My
Ulf Volmer wrote:
> On 09.12.2017 15:37, Sven Hartge wrote:
>> Richard Hector wrote:
>>> Nobody else uses logcheck? Everyone is fine with how it works?
>>
>> I use logcheck on all systems and I see no need to change it. In
>> fact, I *want* the reboot messages and filtering them out would be a
The image with errors looks as it was manipulated in a photoeditor, eg.
Gamma/levels curves ... Does the driver have some image adjustment enabled?
On Sat, Dec 09, 2017 at 10:17:45AM -0500, Ric Moore wrote:
> On 12/08/2017 05:12 PM, Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
> > Something I did *not* understand when I saw it in operation was why
> > a password was needed at the terminal but not from within the GUI's
> > "Applications > Log Out" menu path.
>
> T
On Fri 08 Dec 2017 at 18:30:08 (-0800), Jimmy Johnson wrote:
> On 12/07/2017 02:31 AM, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> >On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 10:02:56AM +, Tixy wrote:
> >>I'm running Jessie (with systemd running but booting with sysvinit) and
> >>trying to execute halt/poweroff/reboot/shutdown fro
On Saturday 09 December 2017 05:12:16 Joe wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Dec 2017 23:56:44 +
>
> Brian wrote:
> > On Fri 08 Dec 2017 at 23:06:00 +, Joe wrote:
> > > On Fri, 8 Dec 2017 17:12:18 -0500
> > >
> > > Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
> > > > I do remember having to give a password, but I don't reme
On Sat 09 Dec 2017 at 10:17:45 (-0500), Ric Moore wrote:
> On 12/08/2017 05:12 PM, Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
> Something I did *not* understand when I saw it in
> >operation was why a password was needed at the terminal but not from
> >within the GUI's "Applications > Log Out" menu path.
>
> Thank
On Sat 09 Dec 2017 at 11:29:58 (-0500), Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Saturday 09 December 2017 05:12:16 Joe wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 8 Dec 2017 23:56:44 +
> >
> > Brian wrote:
> > > On Fri 08 Dec 2017 at 23:06:00 +, Joe wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 8 Dec 2017 17:12:18 -0500
> > > >
> > > > Cindy-Sue Ca
On Sat, 2017-12-09 at 10:00 +, Brian wrote:
> Consistencey can be achieved by not installing policykit. The OP
> appears to have chosen the wrong target.Consistencey can be achieved > by not
> installing policykit.
As Michael pointed out in [1], that's not the case; prior to polkit,
there was
On 09-12-17, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-12-09 at 10:00 +, Brian wrote:
> > Consistencey can be achieved by not installing policykit. The OP
> > appears to have chosen the wrong target.Consistencey can be achieved > by
> > not installing policykit.
>
> As Michael pointed out in [1]
Dear list,
maybe someone might remember, that in kde2 (or kde3?) was an option
implemented, that one could add a public folder, to let people get access to
it. This was a nifty little application, which was running in the taskbar.
In this folder you could put any files, you want to share with t
On Sat 09 Dec 2017 at 18:20:01 +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-12-09 at 10:00 +, Brian wrote:
> > Consistencey can be achieved by not installing policykit. The OP
> > appears to have chosen the wrong target.Consistencey can be achieved > by
> > not installing policykit.
>
> As
On Sat, Dec 09, 2017 at 06:20:01PM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-12-09 at 10:00 +, Brian wrote:
> > Consistencey can be achieved by not installing policykit. The OP
> > appears to have chosen the wrong target.Consistencey can be achieved > by
> > not installing policykit.
>
>
On Saturday 09 December 2017 12:01:59 David Wright wrote:
> On Sat 09 Dec 2017 at 11:29:58 (-0500), Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Saturday 09 December 2017 05:12:16 Joe wrote:
> > > On Fri, 8 Dec 2017 23:56:44 +
> > >
> > > Brian wrote:
> > > > On Fri 08 Dec 2017 at 23:06:00 +, Joe wrote:
>
On Sat 09 Dec 2017 at 20:07:17 +0100, Dejan Jocic wrote:
> On 09-12-17, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> > On Sat, 2017-12-09 at 10:00 +, Brian wrote:
> > > Consistencey can be achieved by not installing policykit. The OP
> > > appears to have chosen the wrong target.Consistencey can be achieved > by
On 10/12/17 04:45, Tom Furie wrote:
On Sat, Dec 09, 2017 at 10:17:45AM -0500, Ric Moore wrote:
On 12/08/2017 05:12 PM, Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
Something I did *not* understand when I saw it in operation was why
a password was needed at the terminal but not from within the GUI's
"Applications >
On 09-12-17, Brian wrote:
> On Sat 09 Dec 2017 at 20:07:17 +0100, Dejan Jocic wrote:
>
> > On 09-12-17, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2017-12-09 at 10:00 +, Brian wrote:
> > > > Consistencey can be achieved by not installing policykit. The OP
> > > > appears to have chosen the wrong ta
On 2017-12-09 at 09:10, Brian wrote:
> The Terms and Conditions of installing a Debian package include (as
> I'm sure you are aware) accepting the Depends: and Recomends: lines.
> What is in these lines can be accepted or rejected and, in the case
> of Recommends:, adjusted to suit your needs.
On 10/12/17 04:01, Ulf Volmer wrote:
> On 09.12.2017 15:37, Sven Hartge wrote:
>> Richard Hector wrote:
>>
>>> Nobody else uses logcheck? Everyone is fine with how it works?
>>
>> I use logcheck on all systems and I see no need to change it. In fact, I
>> *want* the reboot messages and filtering t
32 matches
Mail list logo
