-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 09:27:45AM +0530, Avinash Sonawane wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 3:26 AM, Larry Dighera wrote:
>
> > Try: tput clear
>
> Right. My bad! I already did that. But I have always considered
> `clear` and `tput clear` to be the
Am 2017-06-21 05:57, schrieb Avinash Sonawane:
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 3:26 AM, Larry Dighera
wrote:
Try: tput clear
Right. My bad! I already did that. But I have always considered
`clear` and `tput clear` to be the same so I didn't mention it before.
Anyways I got exactly same behavior wit
Am 2017-06-21 10:06, schrieb Christian Seiler:
'clear' and 'tput clear' are identical in Stretch, both are from
ncurses-bin. This was not true in Jessie though, ncurses did
change behavior between Jessie and Stretch.
By the way. in case anyone was wondering:
Upstream changelog about how clear
On 2017-06-20 17:20 +0530, Avinash Sonawane wrote:
> I just upgraded to Stretch from Jessie and I'm experiencing this weird
> issue with xfce4-terminal. Whenever I type "clear" on terminal it
> clears the terminal (that's expected!) *but* now I can scrollback only
> a screenful. Earlier text n ter
philwy...@kathenas.org wrote:
>On Wed, 2017-06-21 at 07:43 +0300, Dalios wrote:
>> On 06/21/2017 06:35 AM, sare...@att.net wrote:
>> > The full version of Debian 9.0.0 iso will not install from a flash
>> > drive. It boots
>> > into the live desktop with no option to install to hard drive. The
>> >
On 06/21/2017 02:17 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
philwy...@kathenas.org wrote:
On Wed, 2017-06-21 at 07:43 +0300, Dalios wrote:
On 06/21/2017 06:35 AM, sare...@att.net wrote:
The full version of Debian 9.0.0 iso will not install from a flash
drive. It boots
into the live desktop with no option to
Am 21.06.2017 um 07:43 schrieb Wellington Terumi Uemura:
> RTC in local TZ: yes
>
> The bugreport show that this has been patched, anything else I could do
> to stop running system check/clean every time I boot?
I would set the system clock from LOCAL to UTC (see /etc/adjtime)
--
Why is it t
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
> I just want to add that every reasonable shell lets you clear the screen
> while preserving the scrollback buffer, simply press Control-L.
Thank you! I had completely forgotten the form feed!
--
Avinash Sonawane (rootKea)
PICT, Pune
https:/
First of all, thank you very much for that informative email!
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Christian Seiler wrote:
> So what happened is that 'tput clear' in Stretch now behaves the
> same as 'clear', while the version in Jessie of 'tput clear'
> wouldn't clear the scrollback buffer.
This s
Hi,
Am 2017-06-21 11:57, schrieb Avinash Sonawane:
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Christian Seiler
wrote:
So what happened is that 'tput clear' in Stretch now behaves the
same as 'clear', while the version in Jessie of 'tput clear'
wouldn't clear the scrollback buffer.
This suggests that t
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Christian Seiler wrote:
> So what happened is that 'tput clear' in Stretch now behaves the
> same as 'clear', while the version in Jessie of 'tput clear'
> wouldn't clear the scrollback buffer.
Furthermore, this also suggests that the 'clear' and 'tput clear' in
It was working back in Debian 8, now looks like is broken...
insmod
/lib/modules/4.9.0-3-amd64/kernel/drivers/media/pci/cx23885/cx23885.ko
card=33
lsmod|grep 23885
cx23885 176128 0
altera_ci 20480 1 cx23885
tda18271 49152 1 cx23885
altera_stapl
-Original Message-
From: Dalios [mailto:dal...@eumx.net]
Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2017 2:24 AM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Debian 9 - Stretch has been released!
On 06/18/2017 06:42 AM, Jimmy Johnson wrote:
> https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current-live/amd64/iso-h
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 03:39:42PM +0530, Avinash Sonawane wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Christian Seiler wrote:
> Furthermore, this also suggests that the 'clear' and 'tput clear' in
> Stretch clear the scrollback buffer. But this isn't true either.
> 'clear' or 'tput clear' doesn't c
On 06/20/2017 07:20 PM, Jimmy Johnson wrote:
On 06/20/2017 05:14 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 06/18/2017 05:45 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 06/17/2017 03:02 PM, Curt wrote:
On 2017-06-17, Richard Owlett wrote:
I'm using Debian Testing on a Lenovo T510 Thinkpad whose screen is too
small and i
Hi folks,
sorry, to ask here, but I do not know where to ask else.
Just a question: Is it possible, to build live-file systems with live-build for
arm64 cpu's on an intel based system like i386 or amd64?
And can I build amd64 live-file systems on an i386 system?
And vice versa, is it possible
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 03:49:16PM +0200, Hans wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> sorry, to ask here, but I do not know where to ask else.
>
> Just a question: Is it possible, to build live-file systems with live-build
> for
> arm64 cpu's on an intel based sy
Am Mittwoch, 21. Juni 2017, 16:01:31 CEST schrieb to...@tuxteam.de:
Hi Tomas,
thanks for this quick response. Well, I just do not want to compile something
(however, I believe, some binary packages do this at installing, don't they?),
just unpack packages to a chroot.
But you may be right: The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 04:11:32PM +0200, Hans wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 21. Juni 2017, 16:01:31 CEST schrieb to...@tuxteam.de:
> Hi Tomas,
>
> thanks for this quick response. Well, I just do not want to compile something
> (however, I believe, some bina
Hi folks,
We found multiple issues in the live images released at the
weekend. Since then, I've been working on fixes for the worst
problems. I've just published a new set of images as 9.0.1. Here's a
summary of the issues found, and current status:
1. KDE live desktop unstable on some (tested) h
I just completed an upgrade to stretch on an i386 machine.
There were no obvious showstopping errors during the install. I saw a few
"unable to delete directory; directory not empty" errors fly by, but nothing
that seemed dangerous, and the installation didn't complain about anything.
But when I
Hello,
I have here an device with an touch-screen which can I use during the
installation of Debian 9. But when the System is installed, I can't use
the touch-device anymore.
lsusb says that this is an eGalax-device.
Can somebody tell me, what I have to do, to get this device useable?
Stefa
On Wed, 21 Jun 2017 18:43:11 +0200, you wrote:
>Can somebody tell me, what I have to do, to get this device useable?
Perhaps there's a clue here: http://www.eeti.com.tw/drivers_Linux.html
thanks a lot
I think it is an encoding problem.
When I open it in embedde pdf reader in firefox, the a print it as a pdf
file I get same problem,
but if I print it as a PS file, the problem is fixed and the display is
correct.
So the problem is in " pdf font" ?
by the way pdf uses font?
thanks
I've figured out how to install a *bare minimal* KDE in Stretch:
1. When installing Debian to your computer, do NOT select to install
"Debian Desktop" or ANY desktop option. Instead, install print server
and system base *only* (nothing else). Complete the install and reboot.
2. Log in at the
From: abelahc...@gmail.com
thanks a lot
I think it is an encoding problem.
When I open it in embedde pdf reader in firefox, the a print it as a pdf file I
get same problem,
but if I print it as a PS file, the problem is fixed and the display is correct.
As far as I know this would make it a ps f
Il 21/06/2017 18:00, D. R. Evans ha scritto:
> I just completed an upgrade to stretch on an i386 machine.
>
> There were no obvious showstopping errors during the install. I saw a few
> "unable to delete directory; directory not empty" errors fly by, but nothing
> that seemed dangerous, and the in
Gian Carlo composed on 2017-06-21 21:05 (UTC+0200):
.
> What is the output of "/sbin/ifconfig"?
> Do you see "eth0" or something like "enXX"?
.
ip is not included in a default Stretch install. Try 'ip a'
--
"The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant
words are persuasive." Prover
Am 21.06.2017 um 17:53 schrieb D. R. Evans:
> I just completed an upgrade to stretch on an i386 machine.
>
> There were no obvious showstopping errors during the install. I saw a few
> "unable to delete directory; directory not empty" errors fly by, but nothing
> that seemed dangerous, and the ins
Op Wed, 21 Jun 2017 18:43:11 +0200 schreef Stefan Weinzierl
:
Hello,
I have here an device with an touch-screen which can I use during the
installation of Debian 9. But when the System is installed, I can't use
the touch-device anymore.
lsusb says that this is an eGalax-device.
Can som
On 21.06.2017 19:38, Larry Dighera wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jun 2017 18:43:11 +0200, you wrote:
Can somebody tell me, what I have to do, to get this device useable?
Perhaps there's a clue here: http://www.eeti.com.tw/drivers_Linux.html
I can't get the driver from this page running with Debian 9.
Gian Carlo wrote on 06/21/2017 01:05 PM:
> What is the output of "/sbin/ifconfig"?
It's too long to type it all. If you want some part of it, please let me know
and I'll try to type it without too many mistakes.
> Do you see "eth0" or something like "enXX"?
eth0, eth1 and lo are the three n
D. R. Evans composed on 2017-06-21 14:20 (UTC-0600):
.
> eth0, eth1 and lo are the three named interfaces it returns.
.
> (Historically, eth0 is the one that has been actually been used, and it is
> supposed to get an IP address via DHCP from my main server...
.
If eth0 is the name you wish used,
Op Wed, 21 Jun 2017 22:08:54 +0200 schreef Stefan Weinzierl
:
On 21.06.2017 19:38, Larry Dighera wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jun 2017 18:43:11 +0200, you wrote:
Can somebody tell me, what I have to do, to get this device useable?
Perhaps there's a clue here: http://www.eeti.com.tw/drivers_Linux.htm
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Dan Ritter wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 07:40:49AM +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
>> (Now that I'm awake...)
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 2:18 AM, Joel Rees wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 9:26 PM, Dan Ritter wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 11:55:11AM +090
When I do 'apt-get upgrade', I get the following:
The following packages have been kept back:
firefox-esr
and firefox/iceweasel is what I was hoping to upgrade.
Can someone point me at where to look to see why I can't upgrade iceweasel?
Thanks,
Mike
--
As Andy Capp's wife said,
"You're only young
On 06/21/2017 04:56 PM, Mike McClain wrote:
When I do 'apt-get upgrade', I get the following:
The following packages have been kept back:
firefox-esr
and firefox/iceweasel is what I was hoping to upgrade.
Can someone point me at where to look to see why I can't upgrade iceweasel?
Have you tri
Felix Miata wrote on 06/21/2017 01:33 PM:
> Gian Carlo composed on 2017-06-21 21:05 (UTC+0200):
> .
>> What is the output of "/sbin/ifconfig"?
>> Do you see "eth0" or something like "enXX"?
> .
> ip is not included in a default Stretch install. Try 'ip a'
>
That command seems to give more or
My fix in such occassions has been to download in a medium commonly used
(stick, common partition with a system that
has net access) the .deb packages for connman and cmst and install them to the
isolated system using dpkg, then reboot.
Most likely whatever previous networking set-up there is con
On Wed, 21 Jun 2017 13:56:45 -0700 Mike McClain
wrote:
> When I do 'apt-get upgrade', I get the following:
> The following packages have been kept back:
> firefox-esr
> and firefox/iceweasel is what I was hoping to upgrade.
> Can someone point me at where to look to see why I can't upgrade
> ic
I found that to be the case and fixed it by adding missing information
to /etc/network/interfaces. What was missing was the allow-hotplug
line;
wpa-ssid,
wpa-psk
On Wed, 21 Jun 2017, Felix Miata wrote:
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 16:35:30
From: Felix Miata
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject
On Wed, 21 Jun 2017, Mike McClain wrote:
When I do 'apt-get upgrade', I get the following:
The following packages have been kept back:
firefox-esr
and firefox/iceweasel is what I was hoping to upgrade.
Can someone point me at where to look to see why I can't upgrade
iceweasel?
% man apt-get
I just updated some packages and it upgraded me to stretch. That is all
fine but I cannot get flash to work yet again. Is there any help out
there for this program. I even installed Chromium with pepperflash and
it won't work either. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
I am running on a
Mike McClain wrote:
> When I do 'apt-get upgrade', I get the following:
> The following packages have been kept back:
> firefox-esr
> and firefox/iceweasel is what I was hoping to upgrade.
> Can someone point me at where to look to see why I can't upgrade
> iceweasel? Thanks,
> Mike
> --
> As An
Maureen L Thomas wrote:
> I just updated some packages and it upgraded me to stretch. That is all
> fine but I cannot get flash to work yet again. Is there any help out
> there for this program. I even installed Chromium with pepperflash and
> it won't work either. Any help would be greatly ap
45 matches
Mail list logo
