On Tue, 6 Dec 2016 14:21:23 -0700
Bob Holtzman wrote:
> I've run across this a number of times in the past, but it's usually a
> permissions problem, easily fixed. Not this time.
>
> holtzm@localhost:~$ ls -l .fetchmail
> -rwx-- 1 holtzm holtzm 365 Nov 26 14:05 .fetchmail
>
> Sure looks lik
Hi Bart,
just tried and instruction for stretch work fine for me.
Maybe you copyed/pasted something like a cr/lf when trying ?
The key seems to be wrapped.
Am 06.12.2016 um 22:44 schrieb Bart Vliegen:
> Executing: /tmp/tmp.WpSOFxxCW4/gpg.1.sh --keyserver hkp://pool.sks-
> keyservers.net --recv-
When I installed debian I got a message saying my computer (emachines
laptop AMD Athlon X2 64bit) needed some non-free software. The names of the
software were given although I did not record the names. I decided to go
ahead without the non-free software as I would have needed it on a media
and I h
Steve Greig writes:
> When I installed debian I got a message saying my computer (emachines
> laptop AMD Athlon X2 64bit) needed some non-free software. The names of the
> software were given although I did not record the names.
That's important information. Could you try running the installer a
On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 08:17:44AM +, Joe wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Dec 2016 14:21:23 -0700
> Bob Holtzman wrote:
>
> > I've run across this a number of times in the past, but it's usually a
> > permissions problem, easily fixed. Not this time.
> >
> > holtzm@localhost:~$ ls -l .fetchmail
> > -rwx-
Dan,
> On the other hand, upgrade your webserver to a backports version,
> and the webserver has been compiled against the libs you already have.
thanks! Is this also one of the reasons why not all packages in
testing are available via backports? I mean I could imagine that there
are packages whi
On Wed 07 Dec 2016 at 07:28:24 +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 03:10:41PM -0500, Henning Follmann wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 07:25:47PM +, Brian wrote:
>
> > > [Assessement of three options snipped].
> > >
> > > As a matter of interest - why was connman written
On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 03:25:17PM +0200, Martin T wrote:
> Dan,
>
> > On the other hand, upgrade your webserver to a backports version,
> > and the webserver has been compiled against the libs you already have.
>
> thanks! Is this also one of the reasons why not all packages in
> testing are ava
Understood. Thanks!
Martin
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 03:25:17PM +0200, Martin T wrote:
>> Dan,
>>
>> > On the other hand, upgrade your webserver to a backports version,
>> > and the webserver has been compiled against the libs you already hav
On Wednesday, December 07, 2016 08:25:17 AM Martin T wrote:
> > On the other hand, upgrade your webserver to a backports version,
> > and the webserver has been compiled against the libs you already have.
>
> thanks! Is this also one of the reasons why not all packages in
> testing are available v
On 12/07/2016 12:45 AM, Martin T wrote:
Hi,
what are advantages of using Debian "backports"("jessie-backports" in
sources.list file) over "testing"("testing" in sources.list file)? As
Hi
You can't compare, they are completely different. Backport packages have
stable/Jessie compatibility. Test
On 2016-10-13 00:09:02 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Friday 07 October 2016 15:43:17 Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > On 2016-10-04 22:51:34 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 04 October 2016 08:25:46 Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > > > my position remains the same:
> > > > aptitude is poorly designed.
On 12/07/2016 02:52 AM, Richard Hector wrote:
On 07/12/16 14:42, Jape Person wrote:
I'll never forget hearing someone trying to prop an early version of
Netscape up by saying that it was a good browser *because* it failed on
badly written pages.
It shouldn't crash, of course, but I think the w
On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 11:11:29AM +, Steve Greig wrote:
> When I installed debian I got a message saying my computer (emachines
> laptop AMD Athlon X2 64bit) needed some non-free software. The names of the
> software were given although I did not record the names. I decided to go
> ahead witho
Thank you for your reply, Andy.
ufw was enabled on the server machine.
Because I don't have enough knoledge about iptables, I did
$ sudo ufw allow proto tcp from 192.168.0.3 to any port
on the server machine.
Then I successfully connected from the client machine by ssh.
And next I want to do
Hi,
> I would appreciate any advice on this. Is it possible to run a test
> to see what that software was and install it now. Although I would
> prefer not have any non-free software I would have it if it was
> something quite important such as controlling the fan.
As said Santiago Vila, it is pr
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 12:27:53AM +0900, EenyMeenyMinyMoa wrote:
> Thank you for your reply, Andy.
>
Please be so nice and trim your post to be meaningful and concise. Don't
just slapp something on the top.
> ufw was enabled on the server machine.
> Because I don't have enough knoledge about ip
On Tue 06 Dec 2016 at 23:09:59 +0100, Christian Seiler wrote:
> On 12/06/2016 09:26 PM, Brian wrote:
>
> That all said: I'm not a huge fan of NetworkManager, I think
> some aspects of it are not well enough thought out to my
> taste - but it does it's job in the case of WiFi, and it does
> it wel
Thank you for the quick response, Henning.
2016-12-08 1:07 GMT+09:00 Henning Follmann :
> Please revert to your original configs. Key login works be default and
> requires no change.
By reverting to my original configs :
PasswordAuthentication yes
I was able to ssh.
$ ssh -p testac@192.168.
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 02:37:09AM +0900, EenyMeenyMinyMoa wrote:
> $ ls -ls /home/testac/.ssh
> total 12
> 4 -rwx-- 1 u1 u1 776 Dec 8 11:05 authorized_keys
> 4 -rw-r--r-- 1 u1 u1 388 Dec 6 11:57 id_rsa_test.pub
> 4 -rwx-- 1 u1 u1 444 Dec 6 20:46 known_hosts
Which machine is that -- the
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 02:37:09AM +0900, EenyMeenyMinyMoa wrote:
> Thank you for the quick response, Henning.
>
Sorry, you have to stop this. Now!
I think it is great that you want to learn how to use ssh. It is an
important skill for admins and users.
However you are approaching it the wrong way
Hi,
I read the apt_preferences man page and it says that "To configure the
default release in the configuration file, use: APT::Default-Release
"stable";". While I have multiple distributions in sources.list
file(stable, testing, unstable, jessie-backports), then I don't have
the "Default-Release"
On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 01:23:23PM -0500, Henning Follmann wrote:
> Also changing the port to a nonstandard port is not a safety measure. Not a
> reasonable at least. Unless there is some sane reason (like the network
> operator prevents using port 22) keep it!
I disagree with this. Changing the
On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 11:40:04 AM UTC-6, EenyMeenyMinyMoa wrote:
>
> $ ls -ls /home/testac/.ssh
> total 12
> 4 -rwx-- 1 u1 u1 776 Dec 8 11:05 authorized_keys
> 4 -rw-r--r-- 1 u1 u1 388 Dec 6 11:57 id_rsa_test.pub
> 4 -rwx-- 1 u1 u1 444 Dec 6 20:46 known_hosts
>
check the pe
On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 01:49:34PM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 01:23:23PM -0500, Henning Follmann wrote:
> > Also changing the port to a nonstandard port is not a safety measure. Not a
> > reasonable at least. Unless there is some sane reason (like the network
> > operator
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 07:33:06PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 December 2016 17:26:55 Jude DaShiell wrote:
>
> > It may be an ownership problem if you have the fetchmail package
> > installed on your system. The .fetchmailrc file may be in your
> > account but that doesn't necessar
On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 01:49:34PM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> Changing the port at least decreases the number of brute force attacks
> against you, which saves resources (bandwidth, CPU) that are otherwise
> wasted by the attackers.
How about fail2ban for that?
--
Antti Talsta
signature.as
On Wed 07 Dec 2016 at 13:49:34 -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 01:23:23PM -0500, Henning Follmann wrote:
> > Also changing the port to a nonstandard port is not a safety measure. Not a
> > reasonable at least. Unless there is some sane reason (like the network
> > operator pr
Hi.
On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 21:14:51 +0200
Antti Talsta wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 01:49:34PM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
> > Changing the port at least decreases the number of brute force attacks
> > against you, which saves resources (bandwidth, CPU) that are otherwise
> > wasted b
On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 11:28:53PM +0300, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 21:14:51 +0200
> Antti Talsta wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 01:49:34PM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> >
> > > Changing the port at least decreases the number of brute force attacks
> > > against you,
On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 11:28:53PM +0300, Reco wrote:
> How fail2ban can help against an army of bots trying one single
> password per bot?
It doesn't.
--
Antti Talsta
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 11/30/2016 09:57 AM, do...@mail.com wrote:
On Fri, 18 Nov 2016 20:34:03 -0500
Jape Person wrote:
Hi.
I'm getting ready to replace all of our old equipment that has been
used for well over a decade in our home network.
I decided to try to do everything with FOSS -- open source Luxul
router
On 12/07/2016 07:26 PM, Martin T wrote:
Hi,
I read the apt_preferences man page and it says that "To configure the
default release in the configuration file, use: APT::Default-Release
"stable";". While I have multiple distributions in sources.list
file(stable, testing, unstable, jessie-backports
On Wed, 07 Dec 2016, Steve Greig wrote:
> When I installed debian I got a message saying my computer (emachines
> laptop AMD Athlon X2 64bit) needed some non-free software. The names of the
The output of "lspci" and cat "/proc/cpuinfo" would tell us a lot more.
I don't recall the name of the hard
On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 22:46:16 +0200
Antti Talsta wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 11:28:53PM +0300, Reco wrote:
>
> > How fail2ban can help against an army of bots trying one single
> > password per bot?
>
> It doesn't.
My point exactly. Using sshd on non-standard port does, as bots are too
stup
On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 15:54:46 -0500
Henning Follmann wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 11:28:53PM +0300, Reco wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 21:14:51 +0200
> > Antti Talsta wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 01:49:34PM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > >
> > > > Changing the p
Hi,
as I showed in my initial post, I don't have that file:
# ls -l /etc/apt/apt.conf
ls: cannot access /etc/apt/apt.conf: No such file or directory
#
That's what made me wondering what is the default release if
"APT::Default-Release" is not configured and based on what this
default release is d
Thanks for your help. Responses to your suggestions are given below.
Ben Finney: Detect network hardware.
Some of your hardware needs non-free firmware files to operate. The
firmware can be loaded from removable media, such as a USB stick or floppy.
The missing firmware files are: b43/ucode15.fw b
On Wednesday 07 December 2016 14:55:40 Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2016-10-13 00:09:02 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Friday 07 October 2016 15:43:17 Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > > On 2016-10-04 22:51:34 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 04 October 2016 08:25:46 Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> >
Hey folks,
I’m having a devil of a time syncing my Icedove calendar (lightning); to google
calendar. I’m aware of the google calendar provider, and have it installed.
For my personal google account, sync is non-functional: some items edited in
Icedove eventually to the google calendar web clie
Hi,
2016-12-08 2:52 GMT+09:00 Greg Wooledge :
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 02:37:09AM +0900, EenyMeenyMinyMoa wrote:
>> $ ls -ls /home/testac/.ssh
>> total 12
>> 4 -rwx-- 1 u1 u1 776 Dec 8 11:05 authorized_keys
>> 4 -rw-r--r-- 1 u1 u1 388 Dec 6 11:57 id_rsa_test.pub
>> 4 -rwx-- 1 u1 u1 444
Hi,
2016-12-08 5:25 GMT+09:00 Brian :
> Random script kiddy attacks are of absolutely no consequence. Annoying
> perhaps, but no threat whatsoever. In terms of security, changing the
> port number for ssh does bugger all.
What security risk can changing the port number for ssh cause?
Cheers,
Een
2016-12-08 1:07 GMT+09:00 Henning Follmann :
>> > Thank you for your reply, Andy.
>> >
> Please be so nice and trim your post to be meaningful and concise. Don't
> just slapp something on the top.
2016-12-08 3:23 GMT+09:00 Henning Follmann :
>> Thank you for the quick response, Henning.
>> >
> Sor
In my Wheezy box I have two encrypted hard drive partitions,
/dev/mapper/md07_crypt for /home and /dev/mapper/md05_crypt for /mnt. (Mnt is
no longer used. That partition was originally for /tmp; in a weak moment I
persuaded myself that I needed to encrypt /tmp. I have since changed the mount
po
> > Sorry, you have to stop this. Now!
>
> I thought that to be a basic manner as the original questioner.
> Why do you think isn't that good?
> Everybody else, how do you think?
he's saying don't change 4 things at once.
change one, test
change another, test
that's how you trouble shoot
45 matches
Mail list logo
