Le nonidi 29 prairial, an CCXXIV, Andrew McGlashan a écrit :
> If you see no reply-to header, then only do reply to list as already
> instructed with L for mutt, which I don't use.
>
> Always do reply to list, it's simple. IF someone says they are not
> subscribed, please CC me, then take that in
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 00:13:43 +0200
Michael Lange wrote:
> Ok, looks like it's a bug in Jessie's apt version.
Just for the record, in case anyone reads this:
I filed a bug report for apt about this issue
( https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=827365 ),
however it showed that a new fe
On 6/15/2016 4:23 PM, Rodary Jacques wrote:
> Not using any MUA, just a browser (Opera, which is BTW in the official
> Debian list: https://wiki.debian.org/WebBrowsers, non-free but I don't
> know why as it is a Mozilla clone; Mozilla isn't free
What a ridiculous claim this has always been by deb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 07:26:37AM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 6/15/2016 4:23 PM, Rodary Jacques wrote:
> > Not using any MUA, just a browser (Opera, which is BTW in the official
> > Debian list: https://wiki.debian.org/WebBrowsers, non-free but I do
My last reply to the spammer aka 'Nicolas George'...
On 6/16/2016 5:28 AM, Nicolas George wrote:
> With that in mind, you realize that the reply-to-list feature is bad UI
> design:
No, but I did take a minute to test and discovered my MUA of choice
(Thunderbird) does have a bug with respect to i
maybe an easier way if Sarah has smtp working on her debian box.
Install report-bug and run it. If everything gets filled in correctly
and report-bug can actually send an e-mail, the bug report will be filed
correctly with everything debian expects.
On Wed, 15 Jun 2016, Leon.37428 wrote:
Da
On 6/16/2016 7:45 AM, < wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 07:26:37AM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
>> On 6/15/2016 4:23 PM, Rodary Jacques wrote:
>>> Mozilla isn't free
>> What a ridiculous claim this has always been by debianites...
> This is an unnecessary slur. Were it not for Hanlon's razor[1], I'
Nicolas George wrote:
> Now, finally, how do we achieve automation?
>
> The ideal solution would be to have a real header telling us what to do:
> "List-Reply-To: list" or "List-Reply-To: sender, list". Unfortunately, the
> people in charge of that messed it up, they invented these useless headers
Just checking if anyone else has problems with group specific
Group Policies with Samba Active Directory domain controller with latest
samba update (from 5th of June)?
I have one policy that is only allowed for specific computers.
Those computers are part of special groups and gro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 08:20:11AM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
[...]
> Really? Whatever... to claim Mozilla was 'not free' based solely on the
> one little issue with the trademarked logo was just plain silly.
*plonk*
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version
Hi,
> There are MD5 and SHA sums in that same directory. However I can only access
> those checksums through unencrypted connections. Therefore they cannot be
> used to check against 3rd party tampering.
The chain of trust begins by the public keys as decribed at
https://www.debian.org/CD/verif
Did you take a look here: https://www.debian.org/CD/verify , "Verifying
authenticity of Debian CDs"?
The https protocol would add quite some overhead to the download of the
iso-files which are already big by them self.
Regards,
jvp.
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:58:44 + (UTC), Virgo Pärna
wrote:
>
> Those computers are part of special groups and groups have permission
> for that policy. But those computers get "Access denied" when trying to
> read that policy (GPT.INI). It worked before last update.
>
Or maybe I'm wron
> Did you take a look here: https://www.debian.org/CD/verify , "Verifying
authenticity of Debian CDs"?
Yes I did. It's incredibly confusing. It's written with assumed knowledge that
a lot of users don't have. There are lots of hex strings with mysterious 3
letter abbreviations and no commands in
On Thursday 16 June 2016 13:47:54 Dan Purgert wrote:
> In addition, I feel that both parties in the original problem
> (apparently Lisi and Nicolas -- please correct me if I'm wrong) each
> have some fault in the matter. Mainly, this seems to stem from each of
> you assuming that the other's MUA b
On Thu 16 Jun 2016 at 08:18:18 -0400, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> maybe an easier way if Sarah has smtp working on her debian box. Install
> report-bug and run it. If everything gets filled in correctly and
> report-bug can actually send an e-mail, the bug report will be filed
> correctly with everyth
On Thursday 16 June 2016 14:41:22 Matthew Davis wrote:
> (Sorry about the lack of pleasantries in my previous email. I haven't used
> these sorts of mailing lists before, so I just assumed it was all about
> going straight to business like on Stack Exchange.)
Both your emails seemed fine to me. :-
Sven Arvidsson wrote:
...
> Most likely a problem with Gstreamer, is=C2=A0gstreamer1.0-alsa installed?
pulseaudio was too noisy, took it out again, left
gstreamer alone. things now work like before with
alsa.
thanks again, :)
songbird
Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Thursday 16 June 2016 13:47:54 Dan Purgert wrote:
>> In addition, I feel that both parties in the original problem
>> (apparently Lisi and Nicolas -- please correct me if I'm wrong) each
>> have some fault in the matter. Mainly, this seems to stem from each of
>> you assumin
On Thursday 16 June 2016 16:31:21 Dan Purgert wrote:
> > In the end, however, we are all at each others' mercy. :-/
>
> Indeed we are. The people who send HTML messages often create "fun"
> issues (as my client expects text alone). But, "text only" is now
> seemingly the "alternate" rather than t
matthew wrote:
> [snip]
>
> There are MD5 and SHA sums in that same directory. However I can only
> access those checksums through unencrypted connections. Therefore they
> cannot be used to check against 3rd party tampering. (Since someone
> who has the ability to tamper with the .iso can also tam
Hello list,
'open()' for creating file sometimes returns an error:
couldn't open "myfile.txt": resource temporarily unavailable
either in background process or interactively (ex: in Emacs when
trying to save a file).
system: Debian 8.5
with kernel: linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64
and syst
Hi list,
my system is Debian 8 Jessie (stable) with XFCE Desktop Environment and
just a few days back my Iceweasel browser transformed to Firefox. After
that my keyboard shortcut for launching Firefox isn't working if Firefox
isn't running! In other words: if a Firefox Window is open then I can
la
On 06/16/2016 07:44 AM, Brian wrote:
> On Thu 16 Jun 2016 at 08:18:18 -0400, Jude DaShiell wrote:
>
>> maybe an easier way if Sarah has smtp working on her debian box. Install
>> report-bug and run it. If everything gets filled in correctly and
>> report-bug can actually send an e-mail, the bug
Le 16/06/2016 18:18, Dan Purgert a écrit :
1)
So, the fact that HTTPS doesn't ~actually~ provide you with any security
when a "malicious party" has root accesss to the webserver,
AND that it
adds overhead to the transmission
Does it really add network overhead of just CPU overhead on the se
On Thursday 16 June 2016 12:48:42 Dalios wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> my system is Debian 8 Jessie (stable) with XFCE Desktop Environment
> and just a few days back my Iceweasel browser transformed to Firefox.
> After that my keyboard shortcut for launching Firefox isn't working if
> Firefox isn't runnin
Hello! I use Debian Stable. Recently I have installed
unattended-upgrades package, so as to have apt lists updated and
possible upgrades downloaded automatically (while I do not want them to
be installed automatically). However, though I think I have configured
everything correctly, apt doesn't
Sarah writes:
> Figuring out how to file the bug report isn't a problem. The problem
> is I don't know what component is responsible for generating either
> the existing checksum files or the .sign files for the ISOs.
Then file the bug against your best guess as to the culprit. The
maintainer wil
Thank you for getting back to me, Sven,
I normally run apt-get update; apt-get dist-upgrade immediately after
my computer boots. According to the messages log, I turned the
computer on about 5 minutes before running that command and the last
log entry was about 3.5 hours later at 22:59. I hadn't f
On Thu 16 Jun 2016 at 13:04:35 -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> Sarah writes:
> > Figuring out how to file the bug report isn't a problem. The problem
> > is I don't know what component is responsible for generating either
> > the existing checksum files or the .sign files for the ISOs.
>
> Then file
Hello,
Noob question for y'all...
What is the functional difference between dpkg --get-selections and dpkg
--get-selections "*"?
It seems to me that the first command would find all packages anyway, making
the wildcard erroneous...perhaps I'm mistaken?
Thanks guys and gals!
Bruce
On 2016-06-16 21:46 +0600, Andrew P. Cherepenko wrote:
> Hello list,
> 'open()' for creating file sometimes returns an error:
> couldn't open "myfile.txt": resource temporarily unavailable
> either in background process or interactively (ex: in Emacs when
> trying to save a file).
Are y
Jayson Willson [2016-06-16 20:54:12+03] wrote:
> Hello! I use Debian Stable. Recently I have installed
> unattended-upgrades package, so as to have apt lists updated and
> possible upgrades downloaded automatically (while I do not want them
> to be installed automatically). However, though I think
There is only one empty file named unattended-upgrades-shutdown.log in
this directory.
unattended-upgrades:
Initial blacklisted packages:
Initial whitelisted packages:
Starting unattended upgrades script
Allowed origins are: ['origin=Debian,codename=jessie,label=Debian-Security']
No packages foun
On 2016-06-16 18:36 +, Bruce Gates wrote:
> What is the functional difference between dpkg --get-selections and dpkg
> --get-selections "*"?
>From the manpage:
,
| --get-selections [package-name-pattern...]
| Get list of package selections, and write it to stdout.
|
Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Le 16/06/2016 18:18, Dan Purgert a écrit :
> 1)
>> So, the fact that HTTPS doesn't ~actually~ provide you with any security
>> when a "malicious party" has root accesss to the webserver,
>
>
>> AND that it
>> adds overhead to the transmission
>
> Does it really add network
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 at 03:12, Borden Rhodes wrote:
> Thank you for getting back to me, Sven,
>
> I normally run apt-get update; apt-get dist-upgrade immediately after
> my computer boots. According to the messages log, I turned the
> computer on about 5 minutes before running that command and the
First, a huge shout out to /usr/share/doc/systemd/README.Debian.gz for
telling me that appending systemd.debug-shell to the linux line in
grub would let me run a shell even whilst the main boot couldn't drop
into an emergency shell. I think this should be writ in large friendly
letters at the start
38 matches
Mail list logo
