On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 09:49:13AM -0500, Bob Bernstein wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Dec 2015, Dan Ritter wrote:
>
> >Plonk*.
>
> Sigh. Another satisfied customer.
>
> >* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plonk_(Usenet)
>
> FWIW, I didn't need the wikipedia reference. I've been plonked in classier
> joints
On Tuesday 15 December 2015 07:15:57 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 03:06:48PM +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Monday 14 December 2015 13:54:09 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > > > >Woah. Calm down a bit.
> > > >
> > > > That made yo
On Tuesday 15 December 2015 07:17:20 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 09:49:13AM -0500, Bob Bernstein wrote:
> > On Mon, 14 Dec 2015, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > >Plonk*.
> >
> > Sigh. Another satisfied customer.
> >
> > >* https://en.w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 11:00:40AM +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 December 2015 07:15:57 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
[...]
> > Since I'm not a native English speaker, I'll bow to your interpretation.
>
> Since when could one extrapolate from o
On Tuesday 15 December 2015 10:50:55 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > Since when could one extrapolate from one language to another??!
>
> I have to do this all the time.
Well, you shouldn't. Languages don't equate in that way.
Lisi
On Tuesday 15 December 2015 10:50:55 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 11:00:40AM +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Tuesday 15 December 2015 07:15:57 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > Since I'm not a native English speaker, I
On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 11:33:18 +
Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 December 2015 10:50:55 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > > Since when could one extrapolate from one language to another??!
> >
> > I have to do this all the time.
>
> Well, you shouldn't. Languages don't equate in that way.
>
> Li
tomas writes:
> In the languages I know well imperative can express a strong wish as
> well as it can express an order.
True in english as well. It depends on context, though, and can easily
be misinterpreted.
On the other hand it's silly to take offense at what appears to be an
"order" from som
On Mon, 14 Dec 2015, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
. . .
This might be a case where reading the source for the program will give
you more clues.
. . .
hi Sven,
that seemed a good idea, but I was unable to find anything useful
by reading the source.
Intead, it didn't took too much time to write
Hi,
Am 2015-12-13 10:19, schrieb Eduard Bloch:
Observation: various programs use the XDG mechanism (freedesktop
configuration method) to start a specific browser to visit a
hyperlink.
Easy to verify with the xdg-open tool.
Note that xdg-open is just a single implementation and most GUI
toolk
On Tue, 15 Dec 2015, Lisi Reisz wrote:
Now, what do you prefer: being plonked or being ordered to do
things?
Being plonked. Any day. Feel free to plonk me any time.
But issuing orders is likely to get an adverse reaction.
Agreed, Bob?
Absolutely! Mais certainement! In short, nobody like
Hello All,
I'm experiencing a problem on Debian 8 and the network settings using
gnome-control-center, i.e. the applications that starts when we click on
the upper right corner icon.
I alternated the settings of my network configuration between the command
line and the gnome app and now I have a r
On Tue, 2015-12-15 at 19:16 +0100, Fabrizio Carrai wrote:
> Hello All,
> I'm experiencing a problem on Debian 8 and the network settings using
> gnome-control-center, i.e. the applications that starts when we click
> on
> the upper right corner icon.
>
> I alternated the settings of my network con
On Tue 15 Dec 2015 at 11:49:49 -0500, Bob Bernstein wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Dec 2015, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>
> >>Now, what do you prefer: being plonked or being ordered to do things?
> >
> >Being plonked. Any day. Feel free to plonk me any time. But issuing
> >orders is likely to get an adverse reacti
Dear list,
I accidently deleted/killed/destroyed my activity profile settings in KDE
plasma.
The problem shows in that way, if I click on the icon in the taskbar to get
the popping up window, where I can chose the required profile, nothing is to be
shown.
Instead the system freezes. I can c
Running Wheezy (7.9) on a reinstall after launching Jessie thru a wall.
Reinstalled all my s/w including msmtp and fetchmail. I brought
.fetchmailrc over from my backup as well as .msmtprc. Both had been
working flawlessly on the previous install. Now when I run "fetchmail" I
get "command not found
On 15/12/15 05:02 PM, Bob Holtzman wrote:
Running Wheezy (7.9) on a reinstall after launching Jessie thru a wall.
Reinstalled all my s/w including msmtp and fetchmail. I brought
.fetchmailrc over from my backup as well as .msmtprc. Both had been
working flawlessly on the previous install. Now whe
On Tue 15 Dec 2015 at 15:02:33 -0700, Bob Holtzman wrote:
> Running Wheezy (7.9) on a reinstall after launching Jessie thru a wall.
I suppose everyone understands what this means,
> Reinstalled all my s/w including msmtp and fetchmail. I brought
> .fetchmailrc over from my backup as well as .msm
On Tuesday 15 December 2015 19:29:50 Brian wrote:
> Just think, your response might have edged
> him towards it. :)
>
> [Sorry - the first two words of the last sentence form an imperative].
:-))
Lisi
On Tuesday 15 December 2015 19:29:50 Brian wrote:
> Pestering us
> appears to have its benefits. Just think, your response might have edged
> him towards it. :)
To be fair, Brian, it wasn't pestering us that was complained about, it was
pestering the listmasters. "Pestering" us was the right thi
Probably a missing library.
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 11:07:58PM +, Brian wrote:
> On Tue 15 Dec 2015 at 15:02:33 -0700, Bob Holtzman wrote:
>
> > Running Wheezy (7.9) on a reinstall after launching Jessie thru a wall.
>
> I suppose everyone understands what this means,
>
> > Reinstalled all my s/w including msmtp and fe
On Tuesday 15 December 2015 23:07:58 Brian wrote:
> On Tue 15 Dec 2015 at 15:02:33 -0700, Bob Holtzman wrote:
> > Running Wheezy (7.9) on a reinstall after launching Jessie thru a wall.
>
> I suppose everyone understands what this means,
>
> > Reinstalled all my s/w including msmtp and fetchmail. I
On Tue 15 Dec 2015 at 23:12:56 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 11:07:58PM +, Brian wrote:
> > On Tue 15 Dec 2015 at 15:02:33 -0700, Bob Holtzman wrote:
> >
> > > Running Wheezy (7.9) on a reinstall after launching Jessie thru a wall.
> >
> > I suppose everyone under
Bob Holtzman writes:
> Running Wheezy (7.9) on a reinstall after launching Jessie thru a wall.
> Reinstalled all my s/w including msmtp and fetchmail. I brought
> .fetchmailrc over from my backup as well as .msmtprc. Both had been
> working flawlessly on the previous install. Now when I run "fetc
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 05:37:23PM -0500, Gary Dale wrote:
> On 15/12/15 05:02 PM, Bob Holtzman wrote:
> >Running Wheezy (7.9) on a reinstall after launching Jessie thru a wall.
> >Reinstalled all my s/w including msmtp and fetchmail. I brought
> >.fetchmailrc over from my backup as well as .msmtpr
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 11:12:56PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 11:07:58PM +, Brian wrote:
> > On Tue 15 Dec 2015 at 15:02:33 -0700, Bob Holtzman wrote:
> >
> > > Running Wheezy (7.9) on a reinstall after launching Jessie thru a wall.
> >
> > I suppose everyone un
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 16/12/15 13:52, Bob Holtzman wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 05:37:23PM -0500, Gary Dale wrote:
>> On 15/12/15 05:02 PM, Bob Holtzman wrote:
>>> Running Wheezy (7.9) on a reinstall after launching Jessie thru
>>> a wall. Reinstalled all my s/w in
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 04:53:09PM -0700, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
> Bob Holtzman writes:
>
> > Running Wheezy (7.9) on a reinstall after launching Jessie thru a wall.
> > Reinstalled all my s/w including msmtp and fetchmail. I brought
> > .fetchmailrc over from my backup as well as .msmtprc. Both had
On Tuesday 15 December 2015 19:55:05 Bob Holtzman wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 11:12:56PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 11:07:58PM +, Brian wrote:
> > > On Tue 15 Dec 2015 at 15:02:33 -0700, Bob Holtzman wrote:
> > > > Running Wheezy (7.9) on a reinstall after
On Tuesday 15 December 2015 20:01:30 Richard Hector wrote:
> On 16/12/15 13:52, Bob Holtzman wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 05:37:23PM -0500, Gary Dale wrote:
> >> On 15/12/15 05:02 PM, Bob Holtzman wrote:
> >>> Running Wheezy (7.9) on a reinstall after launching Jessie thru
> >>> a wall. Rein
On Wednesday 16 December 2015 01:30:13 Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 December 2015 20:01:30 Richard Hector wrote:
> > On 16/12/15 13:52, Bob Holtzman wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 05:37:23PM -0500, Gary Dale wrote:
> > >> On 15/12/15 05:02 PM, Bob Holtzman wrote:
> > >>> Running Wheezy
I too have had this problem, and while I don't know exactly what's
failing on the script, I know it has something to do with converting the
Index files to gzip and xz. An easy fix (at the expense of some
additional bandwidth) is to pass in --slow-cpu, which will make it
download all versions of
That message does not necessarily mean that fetchmail is the command
that was not found. The message is probably common from the loader due
to it not finding a missing library.
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
On 12/15/2015 05:06 PM, Bob Holtzman wrote:
..huuuge snip.
/usr/bin
/usr/bin/fetchmail
Yup, there it is.
Could you try starting in from there/that folder using your console?
It's sure to find the command.
--
Debian Jessie - KDE 4.14.2 - EXT4 - AMD64 at sda10
Regi
Please post your .fetchmailrc, obfuscating any identifying
information in it.
Scripts can yield up a "command not found" when the nfg
executable is not the script itself but, say, some utility
called in the script. (Think: "Do I need to make any egreps
greps." Just an _example_.)
Also, run
Hi,
Bob Holtzman wrote:
> All the answers I have gotten so far pin the problem
> on permissions. Not so.
There is now a small group of "check your libraries" proposals
which you should consider.
See for an example of such a situation
http://superuser.com/questions/248512/why-do-i-get-command
37 matches
Mail list logo
