Scott Ferguson wrote:
Good question Patrick - top posted as I'm referring to the Subject.
On 21/10/14 06:45, Patrick Bartek wrote:
After much vitriolic gnashing of teeth from those opposed to systemd,
I wonder... What is a better alternative? And it can't be sysvinit.
Yes. Syvinit still wor
On Mon, 10/20/14, Gary Dale wrote:
Subject: Re: Refracta systemd-free progress
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Date: Monday, October 20, 2014, 10:33 PM
On 20/10/14 08:39 PM, goli...@riseup.net wrote:
Check out the outstanding progress that fsmithred and dzz are making
with a systemd-free R
Hi,
This is a question about debian bug tracking system.
In order to use the BTS properly, I have read this page:
https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting
but I wonder if I can fill in the "Version:"
field directly with git commit number such as
""78a6aac2559648d1a0e0b4926e23aed67d8b81fb".
if so, it
On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 23:33:23 -0400
Gary Dale wrote:
> On 20/10/14 08:39 PM, goli...@riseup.net wrote:
> > Check out the outstanding progress that fsmithred and dzz are
> > making with a systemd-free Refracta:
> >
> > http://refracta.freeforums.org/going-with-the-systemd-flow-or-not-t422-50.html#p
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 04:49:48PM -0400, Ric Moore wrote:
> On 10/20/2014 02:35 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>
> >If you mean you are actually DOSing Debian's support channels just to
> >make you're point that's likely to get you banned instead, besides not
> >achieving anything.
>
> ~OR!~
>
> "Li
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 09:34:48PM -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 12:45:11 -0700
> Patrick Bartek wrote:
>
> > After much vitriolic gnashing of teeth from those opposed to systemd,
> > I wonder... What is a better alternative?
>
> * Nosh
So this one is fun, it is just a direc
Who needs to document their own pc they hack on daily?
suddenly I couldnt just place a script in rc2.d folder anymore, needed to
symlink
needed to add an lsb header too it seems
maybe I'm overlooking something
I prefer to hack on my own without using debian tools, update-rc.d i.e.
would be nic
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 08:25:31AM +0200, Ludovic Meyer wrote:
> Even with the addition 10 to 20 people posting on systemd,
> it shouldn't be a issue.
Andrei's point was not that the list /infrastructure/ was at risk, but
that debian-user - this list - was essentially subject to a denial of
servic
On Tue, 21 Oct 2014 08:25:31 +0200
Ludovic Meyer wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 04:49:48PM -0400, Ric Moore wrote:
> > On 10/20/2014 02:35 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> >
> > >If you mean you are actually DOSing Debian's support channels just
> > >to make you're point that's likely to get you ba
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 08:41:19AM +0200, Michael Ole Olsen wrote:
> would be nice to be able to place a script in rc2.d folder again, even though
> it isn't a symlink
>
> it seems that 'feature' has been removed in the new debians
Not sure when it broke, probably quite a long time ago, but this
On Tue, 21 Oct 2014 08:41:19 +0200
Michael Ole Olsen wrote:
> Who needs to document their own pc they hack on daily?
>
> suddenly I couldnt just place a script in rc2.d folder anymore,
> needed to symlink needed to add an lsb header too it seems
>
> maybe I'm overlooking something
>
> I prefer
101 - 111 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
