On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 09:28:56AM -0500, Tim Nelson wrote:
> I have an interesting use case where a Debian Lenny server runs headless, and
> is at the mercy of poor power conditions (environmental monitoring at a
> remote storage building). We used to have issues with the server not coming
> up
On 26/07/13 07:42, J B wrote:
Dear list,
I'm suffering with a very serious issue and seek guidance.
I have a debian server functional at my place which is attached with a leased
line connection.
Iand I use this box as a gateway.
This debian box administer a remote opensuse linux server through
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 08:35:48AM +0100, Dom wrote:
>At the remote linux server, I can found huge brute force ssh attempt at the
>different
>port and surprisingly the attempt is made with the same username which I
>actually use
>to llog into the remote box. Some of the messages from log are as b
J B, how have you figured out that the port-scan targets
the ssh daemon specifically?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51f238bf.5050...@online.de
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 10:52:15 +0200
benjamin kent wrote:
> J B, how have you figured out that the port-scan targets
> the ssh daemon specifically?
>
>
as from log
```
accepted public key from from
port 50574 ssh2
``
--
To UN
On 07/26/2013 12:05 PM, J B wrote:
> accepted public key from from
port 50574 ssh2
That looks like a valid log in from "WAN_IP_of_my_local_box" using one
of your keys. If it is not you or one of your scripts then start by
disabling that key and making a new one for yourself. It's a good idea
f
while going through the verify procedures as described
http://www.debian.org/CD/verify
For newer releases, newer and cryptographically stronger checksum
algorithms (SHA1, SHA256 and SHA512) are used, and there are
equivalent tools available to work with these.
paper@Dhost:~/Downloads$ sha1sum deb
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 03:01:33AM -0700, james gray wrote:
> while going through the verify procedures as described
> http://www.debian.org/CD/verify
>
[cut]
>
> clicking on the link in that paragraph and going to
> http://keyring.debian.org/
>
> The server may be accessed with gpg by using the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/25/2013 07:12 PM, Sharon Kimble wrote:
> With a new user I get the background, no panels, and no menus, no
> CTRL+F2, still unusable though.
>
> Thanks Sharon.
What were the exact steps you took when you installed Cinnamon?
- --
Rares Aioane
On Thursday 25 July 2013 22:05:18 Jean-Marc wrote:
> Click on it and wait 5 seconds.
>
> Thank's for sharing this experience of what you will see with me.
Can you not give an idea of what it is, having tantalised us so? I'm not
curious enough to install GNOME, but I am curious!
Lisi
--
To UN
On 26/07/13 14:36, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Thursday 25 July 2013 22:05:18 Jean-Marc wrote:
Click on it and wait 5 seconds.
Thank's for sharing this experience of what you will see with me.
Can you not give an idea of what it is, having tantalised us so? I'm not
curious enough to install GNOME,
Hi,
I finally opted for some iptables rules:
-A INPUT -m conntrack --ctstate ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -m recent --name tftp --update --reap --seconds 5 -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -m conntrack -m set --match-set tftp_hosts src -p udp --dport 69
--ctstate NEW -j REJECT
-A INPUT -m conntrack
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 15:11:59 +0100
Klaus wrote:
> On 26/07/13 14:36, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Thursday 25 July 2013 22:05:18 Jean-Marc wrote:
> >> Click on it and wait 5 seconds.
> >>
> >> Thank's for sharing this experience of what you will see with me.
> >
> > Can you not give an idea of what i
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 15:11:59 +0100
Klaus wrote:
Hi Klaus, hi everybody,
> Oh, nothing drastic, just an un-recoverable error, with X restarting.
> :-( Not sure I've ever seen that error screen before.
>
> When you click on the user name, the label is highlighted, but
> subsequently and quite m
On Friday 26 July 2013 16:16:43 Jean-Marc wrote:
> Sorry to tantalise you like that, Lisi.
> I hope you did not suffer too much ;-)
No, only a bit. ;-) Curiosity has not yet killed this cat, though it
indubitably will eventually. ;-) :-)
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@l
> The system in question is running from an SSD, which I assume changes your
> assumptions quite a bit. With a traditional HDDs, the loss of power
> causes a head crash, etc which does in turn lessen the life of the drive.
Actually, I fail to see why a power outage would have any negative
effect o
On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 21:07 -0400, Ethan Rosenberg, PhD wrote:
In the bottom tray of what? Bottom Panel in Windows (ugh..ugh). In
Debian (Hooray..Hooray) a panel.
GNOME 3, right? Take a look at the "things" you put to the panel. You
doubled one. I can't help since I'm using Xfce.
=
Ra
On Fri, 2013-07-26 at 11:54 -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > The system in question is running from an SSD, which I assume changes your
> > assumptions quite a bit. With a traditional HDDs, the loss of power
> > causes a head crash, etc which does in turn lessen the life of the drive.
>
> Actually
On 26/07/13 17:53, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Fri, 2013-07-26 at 11:54 -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
The system in question is running from an SSD, which I assume changes your
assumptions quite a bit. With a traditional HDDs, the loss of power
causes a head crash, etc which does in turn lessen the li
On Fri, 2013-07-26 at 19:01 +0100, Dom wrote:
> On 26/07/13 17:53, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-07-26 at 11:54 -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> >>> The system in question is running from an SSD, which I assume changes your
> >>> assumptions quite a bit. With a traditional HDDs, the loss of po
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 15:41:24 +0300
> Rares Aioanei wrote:
> >
> > On 07/25/2013 07:12 PM, Sharon Kimble wrote:
> >
> > > With a new user I get the background, no panels, and no menus, no
> > > CTRL+F2, still unusable though.
> > >
> > > Thanks
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 03:11:59PM +0100, Klaus wrote:
> On 26/07/13 14:36, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> >On Thursday 25 July 2013 22:05:18 Jean-Marc wrote:
> >>Click on it and wait 5 seconds.
> >>
> >>Thank's for sharing this experience of what you will see with me.
> >
> >Can you not give an idea of what
On Sat, 2013-07-27 at 07:30 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
> Are you sure it's not an easter egg? :)
[rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ apt-get moo
bash: apt-get: command not found
Phew! Some distros favour stability over comedy.
What happens if you run "apt-get moo"?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia
Roger Leigh wrote:
> green wrote:
> > Tim Nelson wrote:
> > > On occasion, we find that a filesystem error is bad enough that
> > > instead of auto{matically|magically} fixing the issue and continuing
> > > to boot, the system hangs, needing a root password entered for a
> > > manual fsck to be run
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Chris Bannister wrote:
> > Are you sure it's not an easter egg? :)
>
> [rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ apt-get moo
> bash: apt-get: command not found
>
> Phew! Some distros favour stability over comedy.
Are you implying that having the "apt-get" command on the system
reduces stab
On 26/07/13 20:06, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Fri, 2013-07-26 at 19:01 +0100, Dom wrote:
On 26/07/13 17:53, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Fri, 2013-07-26 at 11:54 -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
The system in question is running from an SSD, which I assume changes your
assumptions quite a bit. With a tradit
On Fri 26 Jul 2013 at 12:55:04 +0300, Lars Noodén wrote:
> disabling that key and making a new one for yourself. It's a good idea
> for keys to be rotated periodically anyway.
Does this 'good idea' have reasons to support it?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
w
Otwórz tą wiadomość aplikacją obsługującą wiadomości HTML
On Fri, 2013-07-26 at 13:57 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > Chris Bannister wrote:
> > > Are you sure it's not an easter egg? :)
> >
> > [rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ apt-get moo
> > bash: apt-get: command not found
> >
> > Phew! Some distros favour stability over comedy.
>
> Are
Bob Proulx wrote at 2013-07-26 14:51 -0500:
> I always set FSCKFIX=yes in /etc/default/rcS and think that is the
> best default.
I agree with Bob's comments about this, in general, and have just now
gone and set FSCKFIX=yes on a particular server because it would be
better for it to boot with a pa
Jean-Marc, 25.07.2013:
> Hi guys,
>
> Are you a Gnome3 user ?
> Do you want to try something funny ?
> Just open the System Settings, click on "User Accounts" and try to change
> your name.
> You can do it just in clicking on your name to switch to an edit mode.
> Click on it and wait 5 seconds.
Hello,
it has now been months that Gimp developers seem to have decided that
their "product vision" in Gimp2.8 (debian/unstable) is more relevant
than the workflow of their users.
People who use Gimp *a lot* keep clicking "Save as" instead of "Export"
because that is what they're used to. Be
32 matches
Mail list logo
