Hi have following line in my /etc/fstab
//server/dir /mnt/dir cifs
defaults,user,noauto,sec=krb50 0
mounting works flawlessly, unsing the ticket obtained through pam_krb5 at login.
However
umount /mnt/it leads to :
umount: only root can
On Wed, 2013-05-29 at 07:10 -0700, peasth...@shaw.ca wrote:
> * From: Andrei POPESCU
> * Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 19:31:42 +0300
> > I doubt there is any general Debian policy of using OpenSSL rather than
> > GnuTLS.
>
> OK; thanks.
>
> > If a particular software can use both it's usuall
On 30/05/13 09:57, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> Kali is a modified Debian wheezy. It only has a root account.
Sounds like kali is a rather specialised distro, and should only really
be used as necessary for its intended purpose of penetration testing and
security research. Better to use a more conventional
On 29/05/13 11:59, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Wed, 29 May 2013 10:47:55 +0100
> Matej Kosik <5764c029b688c1c0d24a2e97cd7...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello Matej,
>
>> The reason seems to be that, from now on, GNOME cannot be installed
>> without PackageKit. :-/
>
> Oh dear. Maybe removal of the GNOME
On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 09:05 +0200, Erwan David wrote:
> Hi have following line in my /etc/fstab
> //server/dir /mnt/dir cifs
> defaults,user,noauto,sec=krb50 0
>
> mounting works flawlessly, unsing the ticket obtained through pam_krb5 at
>
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:50:37AM CEST, Ralf Mardorf
said:
> On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 09:05 +0200, Erwan David wrote:
> > Hi have following line in my /etc/fstab
> > //server/dir /mnt/dir cifs
> > defaults,user,noauto,sec=krb50 0
> >
> > mount
On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 10:59 +0200, Erwan David wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:50:37AM CEST, Ralf Mardorf
> said:
> > On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 09:05 +0200, Erwan David wrote:
> > > Hi have following line in my /etc/fstab
> > > //server/dir /mnt/dir cifs
> >
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:30:33AM CEST, Ralf Mardorf
said:
> On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 10:59 +0200, Erwan David wrote:
> > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:50:37AM CEST, Ralf Mardorf
> > said:
> > > On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 09:05 +0200, Erwan David wrote:
> > > > Hi have following line in my /etc/f
On 30/05/13 10:50, Erwan David wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:30:33AM CEST, Ralf Mardorf
said:
On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 10:59 +0200, Erwan David wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:50:37AM CEST, Ralf Mardorf
said:
On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 09:05 +0200, Erwan David wrote:
Hi have followi
On Thu, 30 May 2013 13:38:15 +0700
Sthu Deus wrote:
Hello Sthu,
>Oh! I would long time look for the reason! - Restart really made the
>trick! Thanks again!
NP. Glad it proved easy to resolve.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)radnever immedi
On Thu, 30 May 2013 09:38:11 +0100
Matej Kosik <5764c029b688c1c0d24a2e97cd7...@gmail.com> wrote:
>GNOME & KDE somewhat increase the fragmentation.
I'm (reasonably) sure they're not the only people of working to their
own end.
{snip}
>as if, GNOME was somehow special and deserved special treatmen
On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 12:09 +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Thu, 30 May 2013 09:38:11 +0100
> Matej Kosik <5764c029b688c1c0d24a2e97cd7...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >GNOME & KDE somewhat increase the fragmentation.
>
> I'm (reasonably) sure they're not the only people of working to their
> own end.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I upgraded my Squeeze VM setup to Wheezy and found a problem that I can't seem
to solve. I use ODBC (tdsodbc) but when dist-upgrading, I had some problems
with odbcinst1debian2. I don't recall the exact error message as I solved
the problem by re
Hi, I am trying to use a bitmap font, but it has overlapping characters in
the console in X.
http://s21.postimg.org/leqlgxoyv/Capture.png
My ~./fonts.config looks like this:
http://pastebin.com/P8qVZmYG
How can I fix this please?
Regards,
Sladi
On Thursday 30 May 2013 15:10:17 Sladjan Ri wrote:
> I am trying to use a bitmap font, but it has overlapping characters in
> the console in X.
> http://s21.postimg.org/leqlgxoyv/Capture.png
I have sometimes had that problem with the virtual terminal when using LXDE.
Most irritating. So far as
Hi all,
I have found multiple warnings about Linux and the short head parking
time of the WD Green drives. I have seen multiple instances of the use
of the wdidle.exe package to reset this to say 30 seconds. But Western
Digital emphatically states that that utility in only for about 3
"not-WD1
debian-user:
Does Debian run on the Intel Next Unit of Computing platform?
http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/motherboards/desktop-motherboards/nuc.html
I don't see any traditional HDD ports, but I do see "Full-size mini PCI
Express* with mSATA support". I assume I will need an mSATA SDD,
On Thu, 30 May 2013 12:34:58 -0700
Gary Roach wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have found multiple warnings about Linux and the short head parking
> time of the WD Green drives. I have seen multiple instances of the use
> of the wdidle.exe package to reset this to say 30 seconds. But Western
> Digital emp
On 05/30/13 13:14, David Christensen wrote:
I don't see any traditional HDD ports, but I do see "Full-size mini PCI
Express* with mSATA support". I assume I will need an mSATA SDD
Yes.
http://www.intel.com/support/motherboards/desktop/dc3217iye/sb/CS-033954.htm
David
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
On Thu, 30 May 2013 11:50:06 +0200
Erwan David wrote:
> I do not use gvs (nor any g*) because of dependdencies and I do not trust it.
>
> As a grpahical tool I use smb4k, but it seems unable to do kerberos
> authentication nor automatically mount a mount point at start of
> session
Hi.
Looks
Hi all,
I have found multiple warnings about Linux and the short head parking
time of the WD Green drives. I have seen multiple instances of the use
of the wdidle.exe package to reset this to say 30 seconds. But Western
Digital emphatically states that that utility in only for about 3
"not-WD1
Hi,
Dňa 30.05.2013 22:19 recovery...@gmail.com wrote / napísal(a):
> it WILL brick your harddrive,
> steal all food from your fridge, and will do unspeakable things to
> kittens.
these words are reason, why i love the people around of free software
(and associated MLs) :-)))
I see that you are
On 31/05/13 08:19, recovery...@gmail.com wrote:
> It's really simple - do you have the source code of this wdidle.exe
> utility? What about running this wdidle.exe on Linux?
> If both are 'yes', well, good for you.
> If both are 'no' - for all you know, it WILL brick your harddrive,
> steal all f
On Thursday 30 May 2013 23:50:08 Richard Hector wrote:
> On 31/05/13 08:19, recovery...@gmail.com wrote:
> > It's really simple - do you have the source code of this wdidle.exe
> > utility? What about running this wdidle.exe on Linux?
> > If both are 'yes', well, good for you.
> > If both are 'no'
On 31/05/13 11:03, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>> That's a dangerously selective quote. The "for all you know, " is rather
>> > significant.
> Oh, come off it! Dangerous? All he said was that the choice of those
> particular words, that particular mode of expression had made his
> evening. "for all you
On 05/30/2013 04:19 PM, Richard Hector wrote:
On 31/05/13 11:03, Lisi Reisz wrote:
That's a dangerously selective quote. The "for all you know, " is rather
significant.
Oh, come off it! Dangerous? All he said was that the choice of those
particular words, that particular mode of expression h
On May 30, 2013, at 7:06 PM, Gary Roach wrote:
> Several people on blogs have recommended its use but WD says don't.
I'm sorry I don't have an actual answer from personal experience, but I would
like to think if WD says not to use it, then I would probably avoid it.
Noah
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
On Tue, 28 May 2013, Andreas Meile wrote:
> I tried that out on a lab system where I replaced pam_unix.so into
> pam_unix2.so inside both common-auth and common-password config
> files.
>
> Result: The system nows recognizes all $2a$ (Blowfish) password
> hashes but does not longer accepts $6$ (SH
On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 12:33 -0700, Gary Roach wrote:
> I have found multiple warnings about Linux and the short head parking
> time of the WD Green drives.
Again that misinformation :(.
The only issue is bad Linux code, e.g. gvfs makes them spin down and up
again and again, but if you remove gvf
On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 03:27 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 12:33 -0700, Gary Roach wrote:
> > I have found multiple warnings about Linux and the short head parking
> > time of the WD Green drives.
>
> Again that misinformation :(.
>
> The only issue is bad Linux code, e.g. gv
Greetings, everybody.
I wonder who else sees this at the moment on systems running Jessie. I know
that running the testing version will require bug fixing sometimes, I don't
mind that. I just need some help to understand what's wrong. I am running
XCFE4, some of the problems I see may be specific
31 matches
Mail list logo
