> though it is a bit hard - as diver
> dependencies of source packages should be satisfied before compiling
# aptitude build-dep mpd
This one is quite useful to avoid lack of dependencies when trying to
compile something which is already in Debian's repo.
Of course, if mainstream deps have change
Good time of the day, Morel.
Thank You, Morel, for Your time and answer. You wrote:
> > though it is a bit hard - as diver
> > dependencies of source packages should be satisfied before compiling
>
> # aptitude build-dep mpd
>
> This one is quite useful to avoid lack of dependencies when tryin
Hi,
I have some process if run in background, it always very slow, like:
$ ps f | awk '{print $1, $2,$3,$4, $5}'
124201 pts/13 Ss+ 0:00 -bash
29572 pts/116 Ss+ 0:00 -bash
29275 pts/63 Ss+ 0:00 -bash
22080 pts/14 Ss+ 0:00 -bash
11581 pts/2 Ss 0:00 -bash
2920 pts/2 R+ 0:00 \_
2921 pts/2 S+ 0:00 \_
>
> I am new to the xargs, so I don't know how to let it run in background.
typo, *not* run in background.
Thanks,
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/
On Wednesday 23 January 2013 16:58:52 Karl E. Jorgensen wrote:
> > But I cannot push this further all by myself.
>
> Poke the individual Debian maintainers - they're smart people :-)
They are also busy people. They will be more likely to move if *their* users
are complaining ;-) , or even better
> I am new to the xargs, so I don't know how to let it run in background.
> The waiting is going to kill me, I mean so slow.
>
>
> Thanks ahead for your suggestions,
No idea about what is xargs, but I guess that simply calling your script
from a console with a '&' at end of command will be ok, ak
On Thursday 24,January,2013 05:34 PM, lina wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have some process if run in background, it always very slow, like:
>
> $ ps f | awk '{print $1, $2,$3,$4, $5}'
>
> 124201 pts/13 Ss+ 0:00 -bash
> 29572 pts/116 Ss+ 0:00 -bash
> 29275 pts/63 Ss+ 0:00 -bash
> 22080 pts/14 Ss+ 0:00 -bash
On 2013-01-24 10:34 +0100, lina wrote:
> I have some process if run in background, it always very slow, like:
>
> $ ps f | awk '{print $1, $2,$3,$4, $5}'
>
> 124201 pts/13 Ss+ 0:00 -bash
> 29572 pts/116 Ss+ 0:00 -bash
> 29275 pts/63 Ss+ 0:00 -bash
> 22080 pts/14 Ss+ 0:00 -bash
> 11581 pts/2 Ss 0:0
Hello,
2013/1/18 Patrick Bartek
>
> > From: Sthu Deus
> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>
> >> >
>
> >> Check if the user home directory has a hidden .moziila/plugins
> >> directory. This is one of several defaults that browsers search for
> >> plugins. If not, add it, place the flas
On Thursday 24,January,2013 06:35 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2013-01-24 10:34 +0100, lina wrote:
>
>> I have some process if run in background, it always very slow, like:
>>
>> $ ps f | awk '{print $1, $2,$3,$4, $5}'
>>
>> 124201 pts/13 Ss+ 0:00 -bash
>> 29572 pts/116 Ss+ 0:00 -bash
>> 29275 pts
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Tom Furie wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 07:54:25PM -0300, Roberto Scattini wrote:
>
> > ~# route -n
> > Kernel IP routing table
> > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
> > Iface
> > XX.220.XX.176 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.
I used aptitude to upgrade a headless server from Debian stable to Debian
testing. The upgrade did not generate any error messages, but when I
rebooted I could not ssh into the box (connection refused) nor do I get any
output on a monitor I attached to the box (no signal). Apache does not
appear to
Can one do this? Not: Is this easy, but merely: Is this something that is
feasible?
I have a 32-bit system that I would like to migrate into 64-bitness within
the same basic framework, within the same "install". That is, can I go from
32-bit kernel-arch + 32-bit userland =>
64-bit kernel-arch +
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 07:51:19AM -0600, Mark Allums wrote:
> Can one do this? Not: Is this easy, but merely: Is this something that is
> feasible?
>
> I have a 32-bit system that I would like to migrate into 64-bitness within
> the same basic framework, within the same "install". That is, can
On 24/01/13 08:51 AM, Mark Allums wrote:
Can one do this? Not: Is this easy, but merely: Is this something that is
feasible?
I have a 32-bit system that I would like to migrate into 64-bitness within
the same basic framework, within the same "install". That is, can I go from
32-bit kernel-arc
> From: Gary Dale [mailto:garyd...@rogers.com]
> > I have a 32-bit system that I would like to migrate into 64-bitness
within
> > the same basic framework, within the same "install". That is, can I go
from
> >
> > 32-bit kernel-arch + 32-bit userland =>
> > 64-bit kernel-arch + 32-bit userland =>
On 24/01/13 09:35 AM, Mark Allums wrote:
From: Gary Dale [mailto:garyd...@rogers.com]
I have a 32-bit system that I would like to migrate into 64-bitness
within
the same basic framework, within the same "install". That is, can I go
from
32-bit kernel-arch + 32-bit userland =>
64-bit kernel-
On 2013-01-24 14:51 +0100, Mark Allums wrote:
> Can one do this? Not: Is this easy, but merely: Is this something that is
> feasible?
>
> I have a 32-bit system that I would like to migrate into 64-bitness within
> the same basic framework, within the same "install". That is, can I go from
>
> 3
>
> Last night I spent some time to check the "D" stat.
> It's kinda of tricky, why my intuition tells me that those jobs run in
> foreground, not background, won't have such problem.
"In particular, users are asked to run only one background job at a
time." from
http://www.washington.edu/compu
I have a Dell Inspiron 1545 laptop with 4G of RAM and have been a 'buntu user
since release 7.04. With each release of the new OS from Kubuntu I have been
less and less happy with the so called "quality" and I am planning a move to
Debian. As a Kontact user the problems reported with the new ver
On 24/01/13 09:51 AM, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2013-01-24 14:51 +0100, Mark Allums wrote:
Can one do this? Not: Is this easy, but merely: Is this something that is
feasible?
I have a 32-bit system that I would like to migrate into 64-bitness within
the same basic framework, within the same "ins
Le Jeu 24 janvier 2013 16:05, Mike McGinn a écrit :
> I am happy with what I have experienced
> in my VM and I just want to know if there are any pitfalls I have not
> foreseen.
The only one I can see outside of system being configured differently by
default is the hardware support.
Using a live d
From: Sven Joachim [mailto:svenj...@gmx.de]
> On 2013-01-24 14:51 +0100, Mark Allums wrote:
>
> > Can one do this? Not: Is this easy, but merely: Is this something that
is
> > feasible?
> >
> > I have a 32-bit system that I would like to migrate into 64-bitness
within
> > the same basic framework
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 6:51 AM, Sven Joachim wrote:
>
> There are two problems with that:
>
> - Not all packages have been multiarchified, including some important
> packages with many reverse dependencies like perl and python.
> Crossgrading those will leave you with many broken packages, at
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Mark Allums wrote:
>
>
> The third bit is the hard part. I am wondering if I should go from lucid to
> precise first, or do the 32/64-bit trick first. Or is there a way to do
> both at once? If I package it into a virtual machine instance, first, then I
> can snap
On 01/24/2013 02:30 PM, Mark Phillips wrote:
I used aptitude to upgrade a headless server from Debian stable to
Debian testing. The upgrade did not generate any error messages, but
when I rebooted I could not ssh into the box (connection refused) nor
do I get any output on a monitor I attache
> From: Mike McGinn [mailto:mikemcg...@mcginnweb.net]
> I have a Dell Inspiron 1545 laptop with 4G of RAM and have been a 'buntu
> user
> since release 7.04. With each release of the new OS from Kubuntu I have
> been
> less and less happy with the so called "quality" and I am planning a move
to
> D
On 2013-01-24 16:58 +0100, Mark Allums wrote:
> The third bit is the hard part. I am wondering if I should go from lucid to
> precise first, or do the 32/64-bit trick first. Or is there a way to do
> both at once?
With dpkg from lucid or precise you're out of luck anyway. The former
is not mult
On Thursday, January 24, 2013 11:34:08 Mark Allums wrote:
> The most noticeable difference to me has been the lack of drivers. You are
> pretty much on your own finding drivers for things. Debian supports older
> hardware quite well, but there is usually a long wait for it.
>
> Upgrades from re
Hi,
I am running the Debian package of Samba 2:3.6.6-4 on an up to date Wheezy
server. I am getting a lot of errors logged similar to this:
log.sophie-pc:[2013/01/24 08:38:38.848419, 0]
param/loadparm.c:9114(process_usershare_file)
log.sophie-pc: process_usershare_file: stat of
/var/lib/samba/u
On 2013-01-24 16:58 +0100, Kelly Clowers wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 6:51 AM, Sven Joachim wrote:
>>
>> I have crossgraded some packages in i386 chroots that way, but in the
>> current state of affairs I would definitely _not_ dare to try a full
>> crossgrade on my main system with almost 20
-Original Message-
From: Mark Allums
Sent: Thu 1/24/2013 17:34
> The most noticeable difference to me has been the lack of drivers.
Debian does not use http://upstart.ubuntu.com/ .
On Thursday, January 24, 2013 11:54:40 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Allums
> Sent: Thu 1/24/2013 17:34
>
> > The most noticeable difference to me has been the lack of drivers.
>
> Debian does not use http://upstart.ubuntu.com/ .
Not an issue. I prefer typing:
"/
Good time of the day.
Excuse me for off-topic.
Could You please comment this auth. failure:
localhost auth: pam_unix(dovecot:auth): authentication failure;
logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=dovecot ruser=null rhost=91.201.64.249
?
As I understand this - one tried to login to dovecot - but dovecot was
First, thanks for all the input and suggestions.
Here is the basics of my research into setting up user automounting on a
minimal console-only system or X running only a window manager (in my case,
Openbox)--no display or sessions manager. I'm running wheezy 64-bit.
The "quick and dirty" solut
On 2013-01-24 17:51 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2013-01-24 16:58 +0100, Kelly Clowers wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 6:51 AM, Sven Joachim wrote:
>>>
>>> I have crossgraded some packages in i386 chroots that way, but in the
>>> current state of affairs I would definitely _not_ dare to tr
I am running Debian Wheezy, and have installed kvm. When I list my iptables
rules there are a set of default rules defined, and forwarding is set up
for my virtual network. For the life of me I can not figure out where these
rules are defined, and I would like to make some changes that I want to be
On 01/24/2013 05:51 PM, Mark Phillips wrote:
Peter,
Can I access the log if I boot the machine with a live cd of some kind?
Mark
Hello Mark,
read the release notes first and think about what you did wrong.
I do not know how you proceed with the upgrade, but yes there are paths
like these:
> From: Patrick Bartek [mailto:bartek...@yahoo.com]
> Also, someone suggested usbmount, which I was aware of, but in my
> reading, it said that it would only mount thumb and external USB hard
> drives, and not flash cards using a reader. I never tested to see if this
were
> true.
In my experience
From: Sven Joachim [mailto:svenj...@gmx.de]
> > On 2013-01-24 17:51 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> > > On 2013-01-24 16:58 +0100, Kelly Clowers wrote:
> > >> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 6:51 AM, Sven Joachim
> > wrote:
> > >>> I have crossgraded some packages in i386 chroots that way, but in
the
> > >>>
On Jo, 24 ian 13, 10:34:08, Mark Allums wrote:
>
> Upgrades from release to release are more tricky than Ubuntu. It is
> sometimes easiest to just install the new version "clean".
I'm not familiar with Ubuntu, but Debian upgrades have always worked
fine for me.
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopi
Chris Bannister wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 09:54:17AM +, Darac Marjal wrote:
chime in with a reminder that dselect is considered discouraged these
days. It's spiritual successor (a TUI interface to apt) is now aptitude.
That depends on who you ask. For newbies, I certainly wouldn't rec
On 25/01/2013 3:51 AM, "Roger Lynn" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am running the Debian package of Samba 2:3.6.6-4 on an up to date Wheezy
> server. I am getting a lot of errors logged similar to this:
>
> log.sophie-pc:[2013/01/24 08:38:38.848419, 0]
> param/loadparm.c:9114(process_usershare_file)
> log.
- Original Message -
> From: Mark Allums
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 12:18 PM
> Subject: RE: [Followup]: Basic USB Automounter?
>
>> From: Patrick Bartek [mailto:bartek...@yahoo.com]
>> Also, someone suggested usbmount, which I was aw
On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 13:53:29 -0800 (PST)
Patrick Bartek wrote:
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: Mark Allums
> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> > Cc:
> > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 12:18 PM
> > Subject: RE: [Followup]: Basic USB Automounter?
> >
> >> From: Patrick
When I use linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-rt-amd64, An error of a large quantity of
clock source occurs at the boot time when I connect usb-sound-card
AS372(chip:CM6620).
There is not the problem with the stability of the system, but these errors
fill up the log.
When I used kernel 2.6.32, this error
- Original Message -
> From: sp113438telfort
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Cc: "debian-user@lists.debian.org"
> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 6:01 PM
> Subject: Re: [Followup]: Basic USB Automounter?
>
> [snip]
>> > I missed the first of this. Has anyone mentioned pmount?
Good time of the day, Craig.
You wrote:
> I am running Debian Wheezy, and have installed kvm. When I list my
> iptables rules there are a set of default rules defined, and
> forwarding is set up for my virtual network. For the life of me I can
> not figure out where these rules are defined, and
48 matches
Mail list logo
