Re: My favorite radio stations

2008-01-14 Thread David Fox
On 1/14/08, Jamiil Abduqadir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://www.am740.ca/ > http://www.studio92.com/musica/audioenvivo/ > http://www.1010wins.com/pages/272297.php All three seem to have one thing in common - they launch adobe flash player 9 in a window and then play the audio from there. So

Re: [OT] top posting

2008-01-14 Thread s. keeling
Alex Samad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 03:49:52PM -0900, Ken Irving wrote: > > > > varies, and some lists work the other way, but on this and many lists > > the convention is to top post, trim heartily, try to get the attributions If I read him correctly, he meant to say "is

Re: [OT] top posting

2008-01-14 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 11:44:57AM +0900, Peter F Bradshaw wrote: > Ok. Fine. Until you guys grow up this list is going to /dev/null. If people don't stop complaining and leaving this list, then I'm going to complain and leave! A signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [OT] top posting

2008-01-14 Thread Peter F Bradshaw
Ok. Fine. Until you guys grow up this list is going to /dev/null. On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, Ebanutiy Ebanatik Ebanatovich wrote: > Sorry for offtopic but I'm wondering if the cause of avoiding of top > posting is in something technical (e.g. to help forum software to > create weekly digests correctly)

Re: [OT] top posting

2008-01-14 Thread David
Peter F Bradshaw wrote: Ok. Fine. Until you guys grow up this list is going to /dev/null. On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, Ebanutiy Ebanatik Ebanatovich wrote: Sorry for offtopic but I'm wondering if the cause of avoiding of top posting is in something technical (e.g. to help forum software to create week

Re: [OT] top posting

2008-01-14 Thread Paul Johnson
On Jan 14, 2008 1:57 PM, Alex Samad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 10:32:53AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: > > On 01/14/08 10:21, Ebanutiy Ebanatik Ebanatovich wrote: > > > Sorry for offtopic but I'm wondering if the cause of avoiding of top > > > posting is in something technica

Re: [OT] top posting

2008-01-14 Thread Paul Johnson
On Jan 14, 2008 8:21 AM, Ebanutiy Ebanatik Ebanatovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry for offtopic but I'm wondering if the cause of avoiding of top > posting is in something technical (e.g. to help forum software to > create weekly digests correctly) Yes, but not for that reason. People migh

Re: [OT] top posting

2008-01-14 Thread Paul Johnson
On Jan 14, 2008 1:03 PM, Dotan Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You should read this: > http://what-is-what.com/what_is/top_posting.html I prefer http://learn.to/quote for that; the URL you mention only suggests what is wrong, but leaves what is right wide open to interpretation. -- Paul John

Re: [OT] top posting

2008-01-14 Thread Paul Johnson
On Jan 14, 2008 6:43 PM, s. keeling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I believe (maybe wrongly ) that this mailing list is a non > > top-posting list, I try and conform. > > You're correct. List policy prefers "snip irrelevancies and bottom > post." Where are you quoting from? If that's on l.d.o

Re: [OT] top posting

2008-01-14 Thread Julian De Marchi
Only if the lines are also reversed, kind of like how STOP AHEAD is painted on pavement with the word STOP first, then AHEAD after so you pass over the first word in the statement before the second. Well put! :-) -- Cheers, Julian De Marchi -- OpenNIC user - http://www.opennicproject.org/ -

Re: [OT] top posting

2008-01-14 Thread Paul Johnson
On Jan 14, 2008 4:58 PM, Alex Samad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 01:10:00AM +0200, Dotan Cohen wrote: > > Too bad the whole world doesn't use your mail reader. The whole world > > should be forced to use the same mail reader, and the same office suit > > and web browser whil

Re: [OT] Stop Ahead (was top posting)

2008-01-14 Thread Alex Samad
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 08:34:28PM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 02:06:33PM +1000, Julian De Marchi wrote: > > > > > >> Only if the lines are also reversed, kind of like how STOP AHEAD is > >> painted on pavement with the word STOP first, then AHEAD after so you > >

Re: [OT] top posting

2008-01-14 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 02:06:33PM +1000, Julian De Marchi wrote: > > >> Only if the lines are also reversed, kind of like how STOP AHEAD is >> painted on pavement with the word STOP first, then AHEAD after so you >> pass over the first word in the statement before the second. >> > > Well put! :-)

Re: [OT] top posting

2008-01-14 Thread Alex Samad
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 03:43:37AM +0100, s. keeling wrote: > Alex Samad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > All I am trying to point out is for a normal user ( ie somebody who > > is subscribed to the list), when a thread starts, you read them in > > date/time order as them come in, why seems illogic

Re: [OT] top posting

2008-01-14 Thread Paul Johnson
On Jan 14, 2008 8:34 PM, Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 02:06:33PM +1000, Julian De Marchi wrote: > > > > > >> Only if the lines are also reversed, kind of like how STOP AHEAD is > >> painted on pavement with the word STOP first, then AHEAD after so you

<    1   2