On 2005-10-27T19:33:22-0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Our first foray into using a scsi based commercial server resulted in
> its getting converted to ata disks fairly rapidly as the scsi raid
> lost a drive at 2 week intervals. A single big atapi/eide drive
> turned out to be faster, and a heck of a
I'm not very savy but I'd try to write a simple sh script with ifconfig,
grep and a regular expression that would fit for the systems you want it
to run on.
Almut Behrens wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 04:54:22PM -0400, Stephen R Laniel wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 01:45:36PM -0700, Joh
On Tuesday 25 October 2005 09:01, Bob Hynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> Hello, I'm researching sound cards. I'd like to get something cheap
> (under $50) that Debian will probably support with no problem. My first
> inclination is always sound blaster, but any ideas?
I boug
On 10/27/05, Scott Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to determine why I can ssh into
> this box on the first ip address, but cannot on any of its other ips.
> There's 9 ip addresses in all. This machine has worked fine for some
> time...
To restate, a machine I own has nine IP Addre
(sigh) Thank you both...
This still stinks of "there's gotta be a way".. anyone?
S.
-Original Message-
From: Roberto C. Sanchez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 3:59 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: QQ about apt.
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 11:24:37
Justin Guerin wrote:
On Wednesday 26 October 2005 17:08, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
I am using nxclient 1.5.0-113 downloaded from
http://www.nomachine.com/download.php on a Debian Sid machine.
On the client machine I run KDE. Inside this KDE session, when I run
nxclient (using the "availabl
Antonio Paiva wrote:
Justin Guerin wrote:
On Wednesday 26 October 2005 17:08, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
I am using nxclient 1.5.0-113 downloaded from
http://www.nomachine.com/download.php on a Debian Sid machine.
On the client machine I run KDE. Inside this KDE session, when I run
nxclient
Perhaps I should send this to some other mailing list (suggestions?),
but my user has been generating a series of .ps files through firefox
that, when printed, cause the printer to stop printing. Its red LED
starts flashing, and when I go to examine /var/log/kern.log I see many
entries of the form
I'm setting up a server that will host many web sites on my Debian
Sarge machine. Each site will be administered by a different user.
Each site will give users SFTP access, access to the cgi-bin, and to
PHP (with mod_php installed). I'm not very worried about my users
doing anything malicious.
"Scott Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(noob)
I would like to know if and how it is possible to do a non-interactive
install of an .deb package. The pages I have read talk only of a 'yes to
all questions' option which is obviously useless if the package you a
Oliver Lupton wrote:
>>
> Maybe check you have openssl installed on your testing/unstable box
>
That is supposed to be installed on the server and not the client.
Firefox/Mozilla have in built support for SSL 2.0, 3.0 and TSL 1.0 and
hence that is all that is needed for accessing a website using
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 12:38:02PM -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
> Has anyone successfully installed the current version of HP Web Jetadmin
> on Debian
Yes, it's not like it was a big deal.
> - and set up a printer under Cups?
Unfortunately.
> But I can't create a print queue - it's looking f
On Thursday 27 October 2005 20:59, Allan Wind wrote:
>On 2005-10-27T19:33:22-0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> Our first foray into using a scsi based commercial server resulted in
>> its getting converted to ata disks fairly rapidly as the scsi raid
>> lost a drive at 2 week intervals. A single big at
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 10:30:29PM -0400, David Morse wrote:
I don't see why you think this is a problem with the kernel. You generated
bad Postscript, you sent bad Postscript to an unsuspecting printer, that
printer crashed. It stopped communicating with the rest of the world, and
the kernel
On 10/27/05, Scott Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (noob)
>
> I would like to know if and how it is possible to do a non-interactive
> install of an .deb package. The pages I have read talk only of a 'yes to
> all questions' option which is obviously useless if the package you are
> installing h
On Sun, 23 Oct 2005 07:02:19 -0200
Rogério Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just as a data point, I'm also seeing the problem.
Oh well :(. Are you on Xorg or xfree86?
> My video card is a Matrox Millennium G400 (also not dualhead), with my
> system running testing (etch) and with an Asus A7V
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
I will hopefully soon be building a server to donate to my church to
replace a used one that I donated earlier this year. My question is
this: Is SATA or SCSI preferrable?
I am shooting for top notch reliability. I understand that components
will occasionally fail.
On 10/26/05, Ganeshram Iyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> there is another on this wiki (specific to sarge but it needs
> compilation - so did not try it).
can I get the url?
> And as ndiswrapper.sf.net for this card says using a preemptive kernel
How to know kernel is preemptive?
What are the pro
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 05:42:25PM -0700, L. Couture wrote:
> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 17:42:25 -0700
> From: "L. Couture" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.4.1 (Windows/20051006)
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: [OT] SATA vs. SCSI
>
>
> >>>I am shooting for top notch
I'm not sure what the best way to handle this is. I need to add a network card
to a PC with recently installed Debian ("Sarge"). What's the best way to do it?
I don't really want to sit in front of the thing again feeding it CDs, so if I
could avoid doing a complete install that would be nice.
On Thu October 27 2005 08:06 pm, [KS] wrote:
> Oliver Lupton wrote:
> > Maybe check you have openssl installed on your testing/unstable box
>
> That is supposed to be installed on the server and not the client.
> Firefox/Mozilla have in built support for SSL 2.0, 3.0 and TSL 1.0 and
> hence that is
Now that SATA has NCQ and TCQ native (if you are using the proper
controller), 5 year warranties, 10K rpm, and sub 10ms access times, the
What's use from NCQ, if accordingly to
http://linux.yyz.us/sata/software-status.html#tcq
"Queueing support is not currently available in any release ker
101 - 122 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
