On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 09:08:32 -0500
jwyman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi. Nothing will seem to poweroff my PC. I have tried various
> commands, all with the same results. shutdown -h now
> powerdown
> halt
> $ su -c '/sbin/halt'
Try passing this option to the kernel:
apm=power-off
You d
Ben Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have seen cramfs and squashfs both of which have sub 2GB filesize
limit problems and read/write random access issues. So they don't fit
my needs. Please don't respond saying "just gzip each file" duh... I
already thought of that.
Hi,
Squashfs has a 4 GB filesi
sorry, this was due to the rc_expand_param zsh option, which was set
in a script I accidentally sourced.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author
`. `'`
`- Debi
Hi,
Alex Malinovich wrote:
WRT the actual topic, squashfs is supposed to handle files up to 4 GB
without problems. I have not heard of any 2 GB file problems with it,
but my interest in squashfs has been purely academic. I've never run it
in a business environment.
While it is a read-only filesyste
Hi all,
Hey, is now a good time to switch my sources from "testing" to "sarge"?
Thanks
Ralph
--
Linux, to keep you humble.
pgpKPdrLlZb6S.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Michael Z Daryabeygi writes:
> Human beings are multi-faceted. Free Software benefits from intellectual
> people who have many interests.
There are other mailing lists for your other interests.
> You are arguing that politics is irrelevant and relevant at the same
> time.
Perhaps he is, but I a
Um... I'm kind of stuck on something that seems too simple...
NFS with kernel 2.6.8.
I have nfs-common installed, but I can't seem to find any other packages
to configure it. I'm a little stuck because I'm trying to install LTSP
and it's complaining that I have nothing installed for NFS.
--
To
Tom Allison said on Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 08:31:39PM -0500:
> Um... I'm kind of stuck on something that seems too simple...
>
> NFS with kernel 2.6.8.
>
> I have nfs-common installed, but I can't seem to find any other packages
> to configure it. I'm a little stuck because I'm trying to install
Perhaps this is what you're looking for?
Package: nfs-kernel-server
Priority: optional
Section: net
Installed-Size: 196
Maintainer: Chip Salzenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
NFS exports are configured in /etc/exports
Tom Allison wrote:
Um... I'm kind of stuck on something that seems too simple...
NFS wi
The sed package causes apt-get upgrade to stop.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# apt-get -f upgrade
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following packages have been kept back:
libqt3-compat-headers libqt3-headers libqt3-mt-dev libqt3c102-mt
qt3-dev-tools
The following packag
Sed's postinst contains this line, which fails:
sudo install-info --quiet --section "General commands" "General
commands" /usr/share/info/sed.info
The bug is apparently resolved so a fix should be on the way.
Robert Tilley wrote:
The sed package causes apt-get upgrade to stop.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~
As Thomas previously suggested:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=281601
bye
Robert Tilley wrote:
The sed package causes apt-get upgrade to stop.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# apt-get -f upgrade
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following packages have been ke
David Jardine writes:
> vi is the bee's knees. Sod emacs. aptitude is rubbish. Stick to
> apt-get.
> Is that better?
Much. Let's have flamewars about things that _matter_.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAI
Ralph Crongeyer wrote:
Hi all,
Hey, is now a good time to switch my sources from "testing" to "sarge"?
Thanks
Ralph
That depends on your purpose in so doing, the primary function
of your system and whether you prefer to continue to track
testing for more current software or want a more stable syste
also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.01.0810 +0100]:
> We are successfully using SSH hostkey-based authentication for our
> cluster. What I find really strange is that users still get to see
> messages like:
>
> Warning: Permanently added the RSA host key for IP address
> '
also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.09.2318 +0100]:
> Why is node01 being identified by its IP only
Also thanks to weasel, this was due to the IP address missing from
the comma-separated list preceeding each key in the global
ssh_known_hosts file. If the line only reads
nod
On Tuesday 16 November 2004 09:09 pm, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
Maybe I should say:
It seems close to release time for Sarge. Would now be a good time to start
tracking Sarge instead of testing? I don't want to continue doing updates
past the release and then have to backtrack.
Thanks
Ralph
> Ralp
On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 19:49 -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> David Jardine writes:
> > vi is the bee's knees. Sod emacs. aptitude is rubbish. Stick to
> > apt-get.
>
> > Is that better?
>
> Much. Let's have flamewars about things that _matter_.
Such as this: Sarge. D-I. Sarge. D-I. Think about it
Thanks for responding. But this is exactly what i am doing. I am booting off
the boot
floppy with my previous kernel.
I guess my question is: Is there a way I can find out how the MBR is
configured?
--- Shaul Karl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 11:34:14AM -0800, Punit A
Ralph Crongeyer wrote:
> Hey, is now a good time to switch my sources from "testing" to "sarge"?
If you want to track Sarge, not Testing, after Sarge becomes stable.
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 00:27:21 + (GMT)
Thomas Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- "Rodney D. Myers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Any idea how to correct this?
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=281601
>
> -- Thomas Adam
Just grabbed the "new" file listed in the bug rep
Thanks for the advice. It looks like I'll be at this for a while...if
I can't make any headway with it, I'll ask for more help
Thanks again,
da
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 03:11:38 -0600, Yusuf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Your firewall rules look, uh, ugly, meaning, not meant for human eyes.
> You sh
On Debian Testing running 2.6.7,the 'route' command is taking unusually
long time to give the table:
~# time route
Kernel IP routing table
DestinationGateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface
x.y.z.z* 255.255.255.255 UH0 00 ppp0
192.168.1.0
On November 16, 2004 19:44, Michael Z Daryabeygi wrote:
Please reconfigure Thunderbird to stop sending out HTML-only messages
(is this some kind of new default setting with TB?)
>
> Okay I'm done, this has gone to far.
Yep
And have you got TB set to top-post as well?
>
>
> William Ballard
Check your iptables settings...I had this problem months ago...
H. S. wrote:
On Debian Testing running 2.6.7,the 'route' command is taking unusually
long time to give the table:
~# time route
Kernel IP routing table
DestinationGateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface
x.y.z.z
H. S. wrote:
> On Debian Testing running 2.6.7,the 'route' command is taking unusually
> long time to give the table:
> However, 'route -n' command gives the output almost instantly.
By default, 'route' attempts to resolve the IP addresses into hostnames. The
extra time of 'route' vs 'route -n'
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 08:23:16PM -0500, Ralph Crongeyer wrote:
> Hi all,
> Hey, is now a good time to switch my sources from "testing" to "sarge"?
If you have to ask, you shouldn't even be running testing in the first
place.
--
For every sprinkle I find, I shall kill you!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Trying to install sarge (woody doesn't have the support for my intel 1000M
ethernet card), plain vanilla x86 hardware: Linux system was previously
installed. I've tried four or five different releases of sarge, with
different dates, and searched email archives and Google and found (almost)
nothing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sven Hoexter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> But F-Prot sucks by default because it is nonfree. Check out clamav
>> instead. http://www.clamav.net/
>
> Well and to close the circle clamav sucks by default cause the virus
> database is not maintained
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> That's not free. They just don't charge you any money.
>
> Of course it is.
>
> $ dict free
> [snip]
> {Free cost}, freedom from charges or expenses. --South.
> [snip]
The default free in the context of fre
Apparently, _Riccardo Tortorici_, on 16/11/04 22:39,typed:
Check your iptables settings...I had this problem months ago...
What did you find your problem was? How did you solve it?
->HS
H. S. wrote:
On Debian Testing running 2.6.7,the 'route' command is taking
unusually long time to give the tabl
Hi All,
First of all, sorry for this OT post and I'm prepared to be flamed for
this but I think we should all read the txt below and give it a thought
and help, if we can.
ftp://ftp.slackware.com/pub/slackware/slackware-current/PAT-NEEDS-YOUR-HELP.
txt
--
Sharninder
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 12:04:40AM -0500, Allen Williams wrote:
> Trying to install sarge (woody doesn't have the support for my intel 1000M
> ethernet card), plain vanilla x86 hardware: Linux system was previously
> installed. I've tried four or five different releases of sarge, with
> different
Where should I put commands to be executed when I login, & when I open
an xterm, but not when a shell is run on other occasions?
I want some commands executed when I login, but not when a shell is
otherwise run, so I put them in my ~/.login, vs. my ~/.bashrc.
Unfortunately, they aren't executed
On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 21:27 -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> That's not free. They just don't charge you any money.
> >
> > Of course it is.
> >
> > $ dict free
> > [snip]
> > {Free cost}, freedom from
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 08:08:26PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 01:23:05PM +0100, Martin Lorenz wrote:
> > In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > > Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> > > >>>I have just complete a PDF form using both acroba
On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 21:25 -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Sven Hoexter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> But F-Prot sucks by default because it is nonfree. Check out clamav
> >> instead. http://www.clamav.net/
> >
> > Well and to close the cir
Sharninder Khera wrote:
Hi All,
First of all, sorry for this OT post and I'm prepared to be flamed for
this but I think we should all read the txt below and give it a thought
and help, if we can.
ftp://ftp.slackware.com/pub/slackware/slackware-current/PAT-NEEDS-YOUR-HELP.
txt
--
Sharninder
Why
On Wednesday 17 November 2004 00:44, Michael Z Daryabeygi wrote:
>
>
Don't sent html to this mailing list
--
Alan Chandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you,
then they fight you, then you win. --Gandhi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subj
201 - 239 of 239 matches
Mail list logo