UUCP lib/distribution mismatch

The uucp_1.06.1-2.deb that was included in the Debian 1.1-14 distribution is not compatible with libc. The executables (uucico, etc) are looking for libc.so.4 while this distribution comes with libc.so.5. Is there an updated compiled uucp packages available? -- \=

Re: Help installing debian "Other" packages

On Fri, 15 Nov 1996, Wayne Richardson wrote: > I can download these packages from the internet from my windows '95 > machine and then transfer them to the Linux system using a diskette. > When I try to run dpkg on these files I get errors. Are you *certain* that you are transferring them in BI

kernel version

Hello, I have been told that the Debian distribution is based on the 2.x kernel version. Is this true? If so if I buy a recent release of a CDROM set say Informagics will it include this release? I desparately need an actual distribution based on the 2.x kernel versions, Ive been told Debian

Re: dpkg problems

Martin Konold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Hi there, > > how to resolve > > > > Odd number of elements in hash list at /usr/lib/dpkg/methods/ftp/install This is a bug in dpkg-ftp shown up by the latest version of perl - don't worry it is still doing things correctly. It is fixed in the l

Re: g77 failure

> > As I understand it, f77 wants gcc 2.7.2 and not gcc 2.7.2.1 > As a workaround I did now the following: > > cd /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/2.7.2.1/ > ln -s ../2.7.2/libf2c.a . > ln -s ../2.7.2/f771 . > > I will now have to check wether it still works in all cases. > Development team: Please co

Re: setenv missing

Thanks to all who responded, problem solved. Some time ago I had a trouble with with color-ls. I had put bash.rc's and bash_profile's in /etc & /root csh.cshrc and so on A clear out and fresh start has worked wonders, Thanks again , Neil -- ~~