Re: xorg 7, radeon mobility m6 and dri

2006-07-28 Thread Land Haj
Problem solved! It was indeed a mesa problem, since libgl1-mesa-dri wasn't installed (I did a regular etch installation that I dist-upgraded to sid). Once I installed it, glxinfo reports "direct rendering yes" and glxgears works beautifully giving me around 650 fps. Cpu load is about the same when

Re: xorg 7, radeon mobility m6 and dri

2006-07-28 Thread CJ van den Berg
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 04:51:25AM -0700, Land Haj wrote: > When I do 'glxinfo | grep rendering' in sarge and sid, it says direct > rendering is not enabled. That's odd, because the X log definately says everything is fine. > In sid, doing glxgears results in very slowy and choppily turning wheel

Re: xorg 7, radeon mobility m6 and dri

2006-07-28 Thread Florian Kulzer
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 04:51:25 -0700, Land Haj wrote: > When I do 'glxinfo | grep rendering' in sarge and sid, it says direct > rendering is not enabled. > > In sid, doing glxgears results in very slowy and choppily turning > wheels and no fps gets reported. This is not the case with sarge -- I

Re: xorg 7, radeon mobility m6 and dri

2006-07-28 Thread CJ van den Berg
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 03:44:42AM -0700, Land Haj wrote: > If one is to believe top's over-all cpu report, sid and sarge are equal > when I run at 16 bit, but if one is to believe the info on single > processes, sarge is still very much lower. It sounds like the process accounting in the new sid