Re: woody/sid questions (was: Re: ximian 1.4 and woody)

2001-05-29 Thread Colin Watson
vester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >-my cool blackbox desktop won't load anymore...i suppose it is because the >command xsetbg got lost somewhere along the way of upgrading to >unstable...i've been browsing through dselect for some time now, to no >avail. does anyone know what package provides for t

Re: woody/sid questions (was: Re: ximian 1.4 and woody)

2001-05-29 Thread christophe barbé
It's this day take a good start for me. You have updated a lot of packages that is one drawback of using sid. It's the price for uptodate packages. For libgal6, I've seen this problem, moreover libgal-data conflicts with it. I don't know what the solution here (I imagine updating all packages requ

woody/sid questions (was: Re: ximian 1.4 and woody)

2001-05-28 Thread vester
okay...so you have me convinced. i just got rid of all the ximian packages, deleted the ximian server from sources-list and added sid instead...the oddyssey started there... to install new packages i had to go through a lot of upgrading, which was a bit tricky especially with the perl perl-modul

Re: ximian 1.4 and woody

2001-05-28 Thread christophe barbé
I understand that you want to keep ximian but I would like to convinced you that is far from being a good thing. They provided a quite less uptodate gnome 1.4. With ximian you are sticky to mozilla 0.8.1 and IIRC psm isn't working. As you noticed you get dependencies problems. They have strange h

ximian 1.4 and woody

2001-05-27 Thread vester
hello, my system is debian testing/unstable and i'd still like to use ximian 1.4...any experiences? i mean it's working, more or less...i basically added the ximian server to my sources list and apt-get installed the packages. results: gnome is working as far as i can tell, with the following ex