Re: xdm starting, but not configured

2003-06-05 Thread Emma Jane Hogbin
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 04:28:56PM +0100, Pigeon wrote: > On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 12:10:58AM -0400, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote: > > Tried that too. But when I tried to mount / the files from /etc were > > missing so I couldn't reconfigure it to not start xdm. I guess it thought > > that the CD's files

Re: xdm starting, but not configured

2003-06-05 Thread Pigeon
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 12:10:58AM -0400, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 04:04:47PM -0400, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote: > >> Pigeon wrote: > >> > Don't forget Ctrl-Alt-F[1..6] to get from your garbled X screen to a > >> > console. > >> > >> Tried that, no dice. So i re-installed. I'

Re: xdm starting, but not configured

2003-06-05 Thread Pigeon
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 12:10:58AM -0400, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 04:04:47PM -0400, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote: > >> Pigeon wrote: > >> > Don't forget Ctrl-Alt-F[1..6] to get from your garbled X screen to a > >> > console. > >> > >> Tried that, no dice. So i re-installed. I'

Re: xdm starting, but not configured

2003-06-05 Thread Chris Metzler
On 04 Jun 2003 09:51:25 -0400 "Mark L. Kahnt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 03:00, Kevin Mark wrote: >>On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 02:30, Kevin Mark wrote: >>> On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 00:05, Travis Crump wrote: This is a Debian list, not Red Hat. Runlevels 2-5 are identical

Re: xdm starting, but not configured

2003-06-05 Thread Mark L. Kahnt
On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 03:00, Kevin Mark wrote: > On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 02:30, Kevin Mark wrote: > > On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 00:05, Travis Crump wrote: > > > Kevin Mark wrote: > > > > There are different runlevels: > > > > 6 is reboot > > > > 5 is run X and networking > > > > 3 is run networking > > >

Re: xdm starting, but not configured

2003-06-04 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 02:30:13AM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote: > On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 00:05, Travis Crump wrote: > > Kevin Mark wrote: > > > There are different runlevels: > > > 6 is reboot > > > 5 is run X and networking > > > 3 is run networking > > > 2 is single user mode > > > so: > > > linux 3 >

Re: xdm starting, but not configured

2003-06-04 Thread Kevin Mark
On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 02:30, Kevin Mark wrote: > On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 00:05, Travis Crump wrote: > > Kevin Mark wrote: > > > There are different runlevels: > > > 6 is reboot > > > 5 is run X and networking > > > 3 is run networking > > > 2 is single user mode > > > so: > > > linux 3 > > > is what

Re: xdm starting, but not configured

2003-06-04 Thread Kevin Mark
On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 00:05, Travis Crump wrote: > Kevin Mark wrote: > > There are different runlevels: > > 6 is reboot > > 5 is run X and networking > > 3 is run networking > > 2 is single user mode > > so: > > linux 3 > > is what I would say. Then you can type 'startx' > > This is a Debian list

Re: xdm starting, but not configured

2003-06-04 Thread Emma Jane Hogbin
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 04:04:47PM -0400, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote: >> Pigeon wrote: >> > Don't forget Ctrl-Alt-F[1..6] to get from your garbled X screen to a >> > console. >> >> Tried that, no dice. So i re-installed. I'm so impatient, eh? > > Ack, my apologies - I should have mentioned that there

Re: xdm starting, but not configured

2003-06-04 Thread Travis Crump
Kevin Mark wrote: There are different runlevels: 6 is reboot 5 is run X and networking 3 is run networking 2 is single user mode so: linux 3 is what I would say. Then you can type 'startx' This is a Debian list, not Red Hat. Runlevels 2-5 are identical by default. pgp0.pgp Description: PGP

Re: xdm starting, but not configured

2003-06-04 Thread Mark L. Kahnt
On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 22:01, Kevin Mark wrote: > On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 14:11, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote: > > Is there a way to boot into a "safe-mode" instead of having xdm start? I > > didn't configure it properly. When it starts up I get a totally useless > > screen of junk. I need a way to boot the

Re: xdm starting, but not configured

2003-06-04 Thread Pigeon
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 04:04:47PM -0400, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote: > Pigeon wrote: > > Don't forget Ctrl-Alt-F[1..6] to get from your garbled X screen to a > > console. > > Tried that, no dice. So i re-installed. I'm so impatient, eh? Ack, my apologies - I should have mentioned that there's a shel

Re: xdm starting, but not configured

2003-06-04 Thread Kevin Mark
On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 14:11, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote: > Is there a way to boot into a "safe-mode" instead of having xdm start? I > didn't configure it properly. When it starts up I get a totally useless > screen of junk. I need a way to boot the computer to the prompt instead of > having xdm start.

Re: xdm starting, but not configured

2003-06-04 Thread Pigeon
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 02:11:35PM -0400, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote: > Is there a way to boot into a "safe-mode" Don't log in as root :-) > instead of having xdm start? I > didn't configure it properly. When it starts up I get a totally useless > screen of junk. You've booted Windoze by mistake :-

Re: xdm starting, but not configured

2003-06-04 Thread David Z Maze
"Emma Jane Hogbin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is there a way to boot into a "safe-mode" instead of having xdm start? I > didn't configure it properly. When it starts up I get a totally useless > screen of junk. I need a way to boot the computer to the prompt instead of > having xdm start. Is it

xdm starting, but not configured

2003-06-04 Thread Emma Jane Hogbin
Is there a way to boot into a "safe-mode" instead of having xdm start? I didn't configure it properly. When it starts up I get a totally useless screen of junk. I need a way to boot the computer to the prompt instead of having xdm start. Is it possible? I tried running my install CD with "rescue"