Re: woody/linux 2.4/raid/athlon/almost a horror story

2001-06-30 Thread Joost Kooij
On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 12:01:55PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > yeah i could try that, e2fsck was the only program i ran > during that test boot, but im betting most everything > else will cause the same error. do you have an athlon? > do you run it with the athlon optimizations? maybe > its a

Re: woody/linux 2.4/raid/athlon/almost a horror story

2001-06-30 Thread aphro
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 11:58:45PM -0700, > 1309 is odd as well, and a typo probably, too. :-) well thats what cat /proc/cpuinfo shows :) > If you can clock your system busses down, stretch memory timings > and reduce the cpu speed, you might want to try that and see if you > can boot with "

Re: woody/linux 2.4/raid/athlon/almost a horror story

2001-06-30 Thread Wayne Topa
Subject: woody/linux 2.4/raid/athlon/almost a horror story Date: Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 11:58:45PM -0700 In reply to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > i had originally planned to delay testing of linux > 2.4 until late this year. but i recent

Re: woody/linux 2.4/raid/athlon/almost a horror story

2001-06-30 Thread Joost Kooij
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 11:58:45PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > what a horrible experience. > > firstly, i compiled my 2.4.5 kernel with "Athlon/Duron' > support, and was promptly greeted with "Illegal Instruction" > on e2fsck when i tried to boot the system. Kind of > odd considering i have

woody/linux 2.4/raid/athlon/almost a horror story

2001-06-30 Thread aphro
i had originally planned to delay testing of linux 2.4 until late this year. but i recently had an urge to try to do some video capture, and discovered if i want to capture at 640x480 i need linux 2.4 and V4L2. So since this is a fresh install i decided to try out 2.4.. what a horrible experie