Re: why so hard to decline recommend packages dselect/apt

2000-08-21 Thread Florian Friesdorf
On Mon, Aug 21, 2000 at 02:01:21AM -0700, John L. Fjellstad wrote: > Well, the problem was that I wanted to install qmail from the author's > pristine sources, so it couldn't really be under dpkg management. > > Basically, I needed equivs to satisfy the dependencies. > > What was weird is, you ca

Re: why so hard to decline recommend packages dselect/apt

2000-08-21 Thread John L. Fjellstad
On Mon, Aug 21, 2000 at 02:12:17AM +0200, Florian Friesdorf wrote: > There are programs, like mutt, that depend on a smtp-mailer-daemon. > You installed exim to satisfy this dependency. Now if you prefer using qmail > instead of exim, just install qmail, and afaik exim will be automatically > r

Re: why so hard to decline recommend packages dselect/apt

2000-08-20 Thread Ethan Benson
On Mon, Aug 21, 2000 at 02:12:17AM +0200, Florian Friesdorf wrote: > > There are programs, like mutt, that depend on a smtp-mailer-daemon. > You installed exim to satisfy this dependency. Now if you prefer using qmail > instead of exim, just install qmail, and afaik exim will be automatically >

Re: why so hard to decline recommend packages dselect/apt

2000-08-20 Thread Florian Friesdorf
On Sun, Aug 20, 2000 at 03:40:09PM -0700, John L. Fjellstad wrote: > Well, take this 'problem' I recently had. I just upgraded from RedHat > to Debian. My /home directory was kept, and the rest blown away. Anyways, > I ran into a problem with during the configuration (after installation), > and be

Re: why so hard to decline recommend packages dselect/apt

2000-08-20 Thread John L. Fjellstad
On Sun, Aug 20, 2000 at 07:48:10PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > You don't want to avoid something that is an actual dependancy. Well, take this 'problem' I recently had. I just upgraded from RedHat to Debian. My /home directory was kept, and the rest blown away. Anyways, I ran into a problem with

Re: why so hard to decline recommend packages dselect/apt

2000-08-20 Thread Mark Brown
On Sun, Aug 20, 2000 at 11:07:24AM -0700, John L. Fjellstad wrote: > So, how do you avoid dependencies in apt-get? Or doesn't apt-get You don't want to avoid something that is an actual dependancy. > install recommended packages? If that's the case, how do you make it > install recommended and

Re: why so hard to decline recommend packages dselect/apt

2000-08-20 Thread John L. Fjellstad
On Sat, Aug 19, 2000 at 04:26:26PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote: > personally i just use apt-get as much as possible and dselect as > little as possible. So, how do you avoid dependencies in apt-get? Or doesn't apt-get install recommended packages? If that's the case, how do you make it install

Re: why so hard to decline recommend packages dselect/apt

2000-08-20 Thread Eric Gillespie, Jr.
On Sat, Aug 19, 2000 at 04:26:26PM -0800, Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > personally i just use apt-get as much as possible and dselect > as little as possible. I agree, but sometimes it's nice to have that full-screen interface. That's why i *love* console-apt. It's so nice i use it for

Re: why so hard to decline recommend packages dselect/apt

2000-08-19 Thread Ethan Benson
On Sat, Aug 19, 2000 at 02:02:16PM -0400, Daniel Barclay wrote: > > Why is it so hard to decline a "recommends" dependency? [snip dselect experience we have all had] > AGH! I have declined the recommendation. WHY WON'T DESELECT > JUST SHUT THE FUCK UP! Reccommends == Depends as far as dselect

why so hard to decline recommend packages dselect/apt

2000-08-19 Thread Daniel Barclay
Why is it so hard to decline a "recommends" dependency? In dselect (using the apt method), if I select a package A that recommends a package B, dselect switches to the dependency- resolution screen with package B selected. If I simply deselect B and exit normally (with Return), dselect retur