On Mon, 5 Dec 2011 21:41:07 -0700
Bob Proulx wrote:
> Jim Green wrote:
> > I use debian squeeze running 2.6.38.8-4. usually I download kernel
> > source tree from kernel.org and strip stuff I don't need and compile
> > my own kernel. but there is a problem, I think the older kernel such
> > as 2
PS:
Regarding to the way how to build a kernel with Debian I recommend the Ubuntu
Wikis.
Regarding to issues with options when building a kernel for Debian or any other
distro the Arch Wikis often are helpful.
-Original Message-
From: Jim Green [mailto:student.northwest...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wed 12/7/2011 02:50
> Just to be sure: you do know about make oldconfig, right?
I heard about it but never used before, I only used menuconfig.
does that mean my .config would always work for newer kernels?
I
On 6 December 2011 19:33, Arno Schuring wrote:
> Jim Green (student.northwest...@gmail.com on 2011-12-06 05:17 +):
>> On 6 December 2011 05:07, Bob Proulx wrote:
>> > Do you have any examples of something in the Linux 3.x kernel that
>> > isn't in the 2.6.38 kernel that is likely to cause tro
Jim Green (student.northwest...@gmail.com on 2011-12-06 05:17 +):
> On 6 December 2011 05:07, Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Do you have any examples of something in the Linux 3.x kernel that
> > isn't in the 2.6.38 kernel that is likely to cause trouble?
>
> Actually I don't :) I haven't got the chan
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> FWIW, I suspect my mails anyway won't come through the list, since
> my last request for help didn't came through.
Since you emailed me directly in addition to the list (which isn't
needed since I do read the mailing list and emailing me directly means
I receive two separate
FWIW, I suspect my mails anyway won't come through the list, since my last
request for help didn't came through.
It might be not a big step from 2.6 to 3.0 compared to the steps from KDE3 to 4
and GNOME2 to 3, but there was a big step from kernel 2.6.38 to 2.6.39
regarding to rt abilities/issue
On 6 December 2011 05:07, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Do you have any examples of something in the Linux 3.x kernel that
> isn't in the 2.6.38 kernel that is likely to cause trouble?
Actually I don't :) I haven't got the chance to look through the long
changelogs..
my other concern using the 3.** kernel
Jim Green wrote:
> squeeze stock kernel is a little bit too old for me because I run
> some pretty new hardware like i7-2600k, etc. but using something
> like 3.** which introduces features I don't need sounds like not a
> good idea for my setup.
Do you have any examples of something in the Linux
On 5 December 2011 23:43, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
>> If you want to run the older series of kernel but with security
>> patches applied then perhaps the best source would be a distro kernel
>> such as the Debian Squeeze Linux kernel 2.6.39. It contains all of
>
> Oops, 2.6.39 isn't
Bob Proulx wrote:
> If you want to run the older series of kernel but with security
> patches applied then perhaps the best source would be a distro kernel
> such as the Debian Squeeze Linux kernel 2.6.39. It contains all of
Oops, 2.6.39 isn't the squeeze kernel. That is from backports. The
squ
Jim Green wrote:
> I use debian squeeze running 2.6.38.8-4. usually I download kernel
> source tree from kernel.org and strip stuff I don't need and compile
> my own kernel. but there is a problem, I think the older kernel such
> as 2.6.38 are not being patched on kernel.org. lets say there was a
Hello community:
I use debian squeeze running 2.6.38.8-4. usually I download kernel
source tree from kernel.org and strip stuff I don't need and compile
my own kernel. but there is a problem, I think the older kernel such
as 2.6.38 are not being patched on kernel.org. lets say there was a
bug fix
13 matches
Mail list logo
