Re: was wondering

2003-12-31 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 07:59:00 -0500, Paul Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 13:35:04 +0100, Mario Vukelic wrote: > > > On Wed, 2003-12-31 at 07:13, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > > >> ..or PS1='\[\033[1;33m\]\u\[\033[1;[EMAIL PROTECTED];32m\]\H\[\03

Re: was wondering

2003-12-31 Thread Mario Vukelic
lol. And thanks for the .bashrc hint -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: was wondering

2003-12-31 Thread Paul Morgan
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 13:35:04 +0100, Mario Vukelic wrote: > On Wed, 2003-12-31 at 07:13, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > >> ..or PS1='\[\033[1;33m\]\u\[\033[1;[EMAIL PROTECTED];32m\]\H\[\033 >> [1;37m\]:\[\0 33[1;31m\]\w \[\033[1;36m\]\$ \[\033[0m\]' ;-) > this ^ space has to go > > Too colored f

Re: was wondering

2003-12-31 Thread Paul Morgan
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 00:23:39 +0100, Mario Vukelic wrote: > > if [ "$SHELL" = '/bin/bash' ] || [ "$SHELL" = '/bin/sh' ] > then > if [ "`id -u`" -eq 0 ] > then > PS1='\[\033[01;[EMAIL PROTECTED]: \[\033[01;34m\]\w \$ > \[\033[00m\]' > else > P

Re: was wondering

2003-12-31 Thread Mario Vukelic
On Wed, 2003-12-31 at 07:13, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > ..or PS1='\[\033[1;33m\]\u\[\033[1;[EMAIL PROTECTED];32m\]\H\[\033 > [1;37m\]:\[\0 33[1;31m\]\w \[\033[1;36m\]\$ \[\033[0m\]' ;-) this ^ space has to go Too colored for my taste, though :) Seems a good time to ask a question: Since my

Re: was wondering

2003-12-31 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 00:23:39 +0100, Mario Vukelic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 23:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I have an old kernel 2.2.12 and I was wondering if it is possible to > > get some source code t

Re: was wondering

2003-12-30 Thread Paul Morgan
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 17:46:28 -0500, Xzbenjudah7 wrote: > I have an old kernel 2.2.12 and I was wondering if it is possible to get some > source code to recompile the kernel with terminal font color highlighting. I > am not sure what to call it but its the font that's typed when

Re: was wondering

2003-12-30 Thread Mario Vukelic
On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 23:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have an old kernel 2.2.12 and I was wondering if it is possible to > get some source code to recompile the kernel with terminal font color > highlighting. I am not sure what to call it but its the font that's > typed w

Re: was wondering

2003-12-30 Thread Wayne Topa
[EMAIL PROTECTED]([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > I have an old kernel 2.2.12 and I was wondering if it is possible to get some > source code to recompile the kernel with terminal font color highlighting. I > am not sure what to call it but its the font that's typed

was wondering

2003-12-30 Thread Xzbenjudah7
I have an old kernel 2.2.12 and I was wondering if it is possible to get some source code to recompile the kernel with terminal font color highlighting. I am not sure what to call it but its the font that's typed whenever your at a prompt. A different color for directories and anothe

Re: In case anyone was wondering where kde.tdyc.com went.

1999-10-05 Thread Richard E. Hawkins
[While I am a lawyer, the following is not legal advice. If you need legal advice, contact an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.] > It is not that Qt is incomaptible it is the fact that KDE is linked to > software under a non GPL license and KDE is under the GPL. This > violates the GPL.

Re: In case anyone was wondering where kde.tdyc.com went.

1999-10-05 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Oct 04, 1999 at 10:38:36PM -0400, B. Szyszka wrote: > OK, but what about the KDE folks, then? Why don't the mirrors for KDE have > apt-ing setup? Ask them. -- Mark Brown mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Trying to avoid grumpiness) http://www.tardis.ed.ac.uk/~broonie/ EUFS

RE: In case anyone was wondering where kde.tdyc.com went.

1999-10-05 Thread B. Szyszka
> > Is there any particular reason why the Debian and/or KDE mirror sites > > don't offer the apt sources? Getting at least half of the KDE mirrors out > > there to mirror the apt sources would be heaven. Gnome has a buttload > > of apt sources, why can't KDE? > Debian folk have determined that t

Re: In case anyone was wondering where kde.tdyc.com went.

1999-10-05 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Oct 04, 1999 at 04:42:59PM -0700, Eric G . Miller wrote: > On Mon, Oct 04, 1999 at 06:03:37PM -0400, B. Szyszka wrote: > > Is there any particular reason why the Debian and/or KDE mirror sites > > don't offer the apt sources? Getting at least half of the KDE mirrors out > > there to mirror

Re: In case anyone was wondering where kde.tdyc.com went.

1999-10-05 Thread Brian Servis
*- On 4 Oct, Eric G . Miller wrote about "Re: In case anyone was wondering where kde.tdyc.com went." > On Mon, Oct 04, 1999 at 06:03:37PM -0400, B. Szyszka wrote: >> Is there any particular reason why the Debian and/or KDE mirror sites >> don't offer the apt sources

Re: In case anyone was wondering where kde.tdyc.com went.

1999-10-04 Thread Eric G . Miller
On Mon, Oct 04, 1999 at 06:03:37PM -0400, B. Szyszka wrote: > Is there any particular reason why the Debian and/or KDE mirror sites > don't offer the apt sources? Getting at least half of the KDE mirrors out > there to mirror the apt sources would be heaven. Gnome has a buttload > of apt sources, w

RE: In case anyone was wondering where kde.tdyc.com went.

1999-10-04 Thread B. Szyszka
> kde.tdyc.com is looking for a home and it is currently distributing only > the bare minimum for kde. [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the actual > kde.tdyc.com administrator. Is there any particular reason why the Debian and/or KDE mirror sites don't offer the apt sources? Getting at least half of the KDE

In case anyone was wondering where kde.tdyc.com went.

1999-10-04 Thread Todd Suess
In case anyone was wondering where the debian mirror at kde.tdyc.com went, here is the email I exchanged with the site admin. On Mon, 4 Oct 1999, Todd Suess wrote: > This site on your FTP server is missing all the debian unix archives, have > they been > removed for any particular r

Re: was wondering if you could help us

1998-01-06 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Tue, Jan 06, 1998 at 05:13:14AM -0500, Fuzzy wrote: > On Tue, 6 Jan 1998, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > > > > is there an installer .deb for the current version? > > > > There's netscape4_4.0-6.deb in hamm, the current unstable release. > > > > I think it should install properly on a 1.3.x system th

Re: [fuzzy@ns.asarian.org: was wondering if you could help us]

1998-01-04 Thread Randy Edwards
On Sun, 4 Jan 1998, Orn E. Hansen wrote: > > we'd like to try other window managers... what is available and > They reside in the binary/X11 directory I'd think. There are, The hamm distribution has KDE desktop. This thing is *real* slick. You can see screenshots and get info from www.kd

Re: [fuzzy@ns.asarian.org: was wondering if you could help us]

1998-01-04 Thread Orn E. Hansen
> we so far have gotten xdm/xwindows running, but the type size is too > small to be readable. I think its defaulting to 1024x768 how do I > have it resize to 800x600, without losing the ability to switch to the I suggest keeping the 1024x768 screen size, and only changing fontsizes for those

Re: [fuzzy@ns.asarian.org: was wondering if you could help us]

1998-01-04 Thread bernie
> -Forwarded message from Fuzzy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>- > I think its defaulting to 1024x768 how do I > have it resize to 800x600, without losing the ability to switch to the > smaller size. In theory Ctrl-Alt-(numeric)+ will cycle you through the screen modes defined in XF86Config. In p

[fuzzy@ns.asarian.org: was wondering if you could help us]

1998-01-04 Thread Hamish Moffatt
-Forwarded message from Fuzzy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>- we still can't directly post to debian-users, altho we do get posts correctly, (puzzled look). we so far have gotten xdm/xwindows running, but the type size is too small to be readable. I think its defaulting to 1024x768 how do I have