Problem solved. Upgrading portsenty to the current woody fixed it.
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 08:36:21AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 07:44:51PM +, Pollywog wrote:
> > On 2001.12.20 19:33 Pollywog wrote:
> > >On 2001.12.20 19:04 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >>What doe
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 07:44:51PM +, Pollywog wrote:
> On 2001.12.20 19:33 Pollywog wrote:
> >On 2001.12.20 19:04 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>What does this warning mean and what is causing it?
> >>
> >>> Dec 20 12:02:10 tc portsentry[540]: attackalert: Possible stealth
> >>> scan from unknow
On 2001.12.20 19:33 Pollywog wrote:
On 2001.12.20 19:04 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What does this warning mean and what is causing it?
> Dec 20 12:02:10 tc portsentry[540]: attackalert: Possible stealth scan
> from unknown host to TCP port: 111 (accept failed)
I get it when I run a 2.4 kernel bu
On 2001.12.20 19:04 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What does this warning mean and what is causing it?
> Dec 20 12:02:10 tc portsentry[540]: attackalert: Possible stealth scan
> from unknown host to TCP port: 111 (accept failed)
I get it when I run a 2.4 kernel but not when I run a 2.2 kernel so I
be
What does this warning mean and what is causing it?
> Dec 20 12:02:10 tc portsentry[540]: attackalert: Possible stealth scan
> from unknown host to TCP port: 111 (accept failed)
I get it when I run a 2.4 kernel but not when I run a 2.2 kernel so I
believe it's something internal to my system. Th
5 matches
Mail list logo