On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 15:20:56 +
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 09:17:04AM -0500, Celejar wrote:
> > Anyone know what happened to w32codecs in debian-multimedia.org? It's
> > gone from Unstable and Stable, and I only see it in Oldstable.
> > Searc
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 09:17:04AM -0500, Celejar wrote:
> Anyone know what happened to w32codecs in debian-multimedia.org? It's
> gone from Unstable and Stable, and I only see it in Oldstable.
> Searching both the site and the general 'net doesn't turn up anything
> he
On Mon,01.Mar.10, 10:30:39, Celejar wrote:
> Ah, thanks. My problem was that I hadn't realized that d-m had a
> non-free section at all. I had always assumed that everything there
> was basically non-free anyway. In Oldstable, the package is indeed in
> main, but not in more recent flavors.
T
On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 13:11:08 -0800
Mike Castle wrote:
Hello Mike,
> I get the feeling the non-free section is new.
About two weeks, it seems; I first noticed because of the w32codecs
being listed as "local/obsolete" and thought "WTF?!"
--
Regards _
/ )
On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 16:12:38 -0500
Celejar wrote:
Hello Celejar,
> Ah, okay. I'm no expert, but I wonder, can non-official repos declare
Like-wise.
> their own sections, like 'binary', instead of sticking to the standard
> 'main', 'contrib', 'non-free'?
IDK, TBH. At a guess though, I'd say t
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 16:12 -0500, Celejar wrote:
> Ah, okay. I'm no expert, but I wonder, can non-official repos declare
> their own sections, like 'binary', instead of sticking to the standard
> 'main', 'contrib', 'non-free'?
Yes. We have our company name as a section on our internal mirror/re
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 7:30 AM, Celejar wrote:
> My problem was that I hadn't realized that d-m had a
> non-free section at all.
I get the feeling the non-free section is new.
mrc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 16:16:00 +
Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 10:30:39 -0500
> Celejar wrote:
>
> Hello Celejar,
>
> > Ah, thanks. My problem was that I hadn't realized that d-m had a
> > non-free section at all. I had always assumed that everything there
> > was basically non-fr
On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 10:30:39 -0500
Celejar wrote:
Hello Celejar,
> Ah, thanks. My problem was that I hadn't realized that d-m had a
> non-free section at all. I had always assumed that everything there
> was basically non-free anyway.
True but, according to a news item on the site, the non-fre
On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 08:39:47 -0600
"Cybe R. Wizard" wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 09:17:04 -0500
> Celejar wrote:
>
> > Anyone know what happened to w32codecs in debian-multimedia.org? It's
> > gone from Unstable and Stable, and I only see it in Oldstable.
On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 08:15:14 -0700
Matthew Moore wrote:
> On Monday 01 March 2010 7:17:04 am Celejar wrote:
> > Anyone know what happened to w32codecs in debian-multimedia.org? It's
> > gone from Unstable and Stable, and I only see it in Oldstable.
> > Searching bot
On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 16:07:36 +0100
Sjoerd Hardeman wrote:
> Celejar schreef:
> > Anyone know what happened to w32codecs in debian-multimedia.org? It's
> > gone from Unstable and Stable, and I only see it in Oldstable.
> > Searching both the site and the general &#x
On Monday 01 March 2010 7:17:04 am Celejar wrote:
> Anyone know what happened to w32codecs in debian-multimedia.org? It's
> gone from Unstable and Stable, and I only see it in Oldstable.
> Searching both the site and the general 'net doesn't turn up anything
> here
Celejar schreef:
> Anyone know what happened to w32codecs in debian-multimedia.org? It's
> gone from Unstable and Stable, and I only see it in Oldstable.
> Searching both the site and the general 'net doesn't turn up anything
> here.
They're there
http://www.de
On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 09:17:04 -0500
Celejar wrote:
> Anyone know what happened to w32codecs in debian-multimedia.org? It's
> gone from Unstable and Stable, and I only see it in Oldstable.
> Searching both the site and the general 'net doesn't turn up anything
> here.
Anyone know what happened to w32codecs in debian-multimedia.org? It's
gone from Unstable and Stable, and I only see it in Oldstable.
Searching both the site and the general 'net doesn't turn up anything
here.
Celejar
--
foffl.sourceforge.net - Feeds OFFLine, an offline RSS/
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 04:14:47PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 09:56:36PM +0200, Raphael wrote:
> > Dear Users,
> >
> > The last time I googled a lot for w32codecs-package for mplayer. But, I
> > can't find them for amd64 system
Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/02/07 16:56, Wackojacko wrote:
[snip]
I am able to play most file formats on amd64 OS, including WMV-HD, with
mplayer.
S... what *can't* you play?
Well I haven't actually found anything I can't play lately, but then
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greg Folkert wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 17:13 -0400, P Kapat wrote:
>> you mean to say the ffmpeg from www.debian-multimedia.org are robust
>> enough to work on 32-bit as well as 64-bit systems without doing a
>> chroot?
>
> Read here:
>
> http:/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/02/07 16:56, Wackojacko wrote:
[snip]
>>
>
> I am able to play most file formats on amd64 OS, including WMV-HD, with
> mplayer.
S... what *can't* you play?
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 17:13 -0400, P Kapat wrote:
> you mean to say the ffmpeg from www.debian-multimedia.org are robust
> enough to work on 32-bit as well as 64-bit systems without doing a
> chroot?
Read here:
http://www.debian-multimedia.org/mirrors.html
Shows you what he hosts. It appears 64
re.
you mean to say the ffmpeg from www.debian-multimedia.org are robust
enough to work on 32-bit as well as 64-bit systems without doing a
chroot?
To re-instate the issue and not go astray:
Are there any options of using the w32codecs (or anything similar) in
64-bit systems? As Joe had comment
o say the ffmpeg from www.debian-multimedia.org are robust
enough to work on 32-bit as well as 64-bit systems without doing a
chroot?
To re-instate the issue and not go astray:
Are there any options of using the w32codecs (or anything similar) in
64-bit systems? As Joe had commented, there are no suc
On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 21:30 +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 03:22:01PM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 20:45 +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
>
> > > from debian-multimedia.org as proposed in another mail in this thread.
> >
> > But you all keep forgetting www.
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 03:22:01PM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 20:45 +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> > from debian-multimedia.org as proposed in another mail in this thread.
>
> But you all keep forgetting www.debian-multimedia.org
H. Do we? ;)
Sven
--
If you won't forg
On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 20:45 +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 10:06:53PM +0200, Joe Hart wrote:
> > Raphael wrote:
> > > Dear Users,
> > >
> > > The last time I googled a lot for w32codecs-package for mplayer. But, I
> > > can
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 10:06:53PM +0200, Joe Hart wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Raphael wrote:
> > Dear Users,
> >
> > The last time I googled a lot for w32codecs-package for mplayer. But, I
> > can't find them for amd6
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 09:56:36PM +0200, Raphael wrote:
> Dear Users,
>
> The last time I googled a lot for w32codecs-package for mplayer. But, I
> can't find them for amd64 system (debian testing).
>
> Is it still there, but I'm too stupid to find it, or changed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Raphael wrote:
> Dear Users,
>
> The last time I googled a lot for w32codecs-package for mplayer. But, I
> can't find them for amd64 system (debian testing).
>
> Is it still there, but I'm too stupid to find it, or
Dear Users,
The last time I googled a lot for w32codecs-package for mplayer. But, I
can't find them for amd64 system (debian testing).
Is it still there, but I'm too stupid to find it, or changed something I
don't realised?
Thanks for any ideas...
Raphael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
30 matches
Mail list logo
