Re: vmware 1.0.8 (or .9) with 2.6.29

2009-05-11 Thread Alex Samad
On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 05:46:49PM +1000, Alex Samad wrote: > On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 08:13:16AM +0200, Mirco Piccin wrote: > > HI > > > > >> I'm seriously thinking to switch to virtualbox ose... > > > > > > me too but my image will not boot in VB, I have taken a copy of the boot > > > disks to se

Re: vmware 1.0.8 (or .9) with 2.6.29

2009-05-07 Thread Alex Samad
On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 08:13:16AM +0200, Mirco Piccin wrote: > HI > > >> I'm seriously thinking to switch to virtualbox ose... > > > > me too but my image will not boot in VB, I have taken a copy of the boot > > disks to see what I can do, but I am not hopeful - its a W2000 server > > image.  Thi

Re: vmware 1.0.8 (or .9) with 2.6.29

2009-05-06 Thread Mark Allums
Mirco Piccin wrote: HI I'm seriously thinking to switch to virtualbox ose... me too but my image will not boot in VB, I have taken a copy of the boot disks to see what I can do, but I am not hopeful - its a W2000 server image. This is the exact reason I want to move to VB from vmware I also

Re: vmware 1.0.8 (or .9) with 2.6.29

2009-05-06 Thread Mirco Piccin
HI >> I'm seriously thinking to switch to virtualbox ose... > > me too but my image will not boot in VB, I have taken a copy of the boot > disks to see what I can do, but I am not hopeful - its a W2000 server > image.  This is the exact reason I want to move to VB from vmware I also need to work

Re: vmware 1.0.8 (or .9) with 2.6.29

2009-05-06 Thread Mark Allums
Alex Samad wrote: I'm seriously thinking to switch to virtualbox ose... me too but my image will not boot in VB, I have taken a copy of the boot disks to see what I can do, but I am not hopeful - its a W2000 server image. This is the exact reason I want to move to VB from vmware I suspect

Re: vmware 1.0.8 (or .9) with 2.6.29

2009-05-06 Thread Alex Samad
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 11:39:40PM +0200, Mirco Piccin wrote: > Hi, > my experience is similar to your. > I've strongly used vmware-server (1.08) installed in my job laptop. > After last kernel update, there was no way to recompile vmware network > modules. > I've tried any-any-update patch, tri

Re: vmware 1.0.8 (or .9) with 2.6.29

2009-05-06 Thread Mirco Piccin
Hi, my experience is similar to your. I've strongly used vmware-server (1.08) installed in my job laptop. After last kernel update, there was no way to recompile vmware network modules. I've tried any-any-update patch, tried any known fix but without success. The only vmware-server release that i

Re: vmware 1.0.8 (or .9) with 2.6.29

2009-05-05 Thread Alex Samad
On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 10:18:17AM -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: > Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: >> Alex Samad wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> Has any one been able to compile the kernel module for this kernel ? >>> >> >> I have. >> As usual you need "a fix": >> http://www.saarlinux.de/blog/?p=5 >> >> which is cont

Re: vmware 1.0.8 (or .9) with 2.6.29

2009-05-04 Thread Hugo Vanwoerkom
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: Alex Samad wrote: Hi Has any one been able to compile the kernel module for this kernel ? I have. As usual you need "a fix": http://www.saarlinux.de/blog/?p=5 which is contained in here: http://communities.vmware.com//thread/188410?tstart=0 replace the tars in vmware

Re: vmware 1.0.8 (or .9) with 2.6.29

2009-05-03 Thread Hugo Vanwoerkom
Alex Samad wrote: Hi Has any one been able to compile the kernel module for this kernel ? I have. As usual you need "a fix": http://www.saarlinux.de/blog/?p=5 which is contained in here: http://communities.vmware.com//thread/188410?tstart=0 replace the tars in vmware-server-distrib/lib/modu

vmware 1.0.8 (or .9) with 2.6.29

2009-05-02 Thread Alex Samad
Hi Has any one been able to compile the kernel module for this kernel ? Alex -- "Keep good relations with the Greecians." - George W. Bush 04/09/1999 as quoted in The Economist signature.asc Description: Digital signature