There are more interfaces on linux ( Unix-like) GUI for C++.
Glade on gnome desktop ( but depends on gnome) , but there is a very
good open source ( multi platformes) software, very simple to use and to
learn see http://www.fltk.org
best regards
bela
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 15-12-2004 20:45,H. S. wrote:
> Apparently, _Mason Loring Bliss_, on 15/12/04 14:30,typed:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 05:13:28PM -0500, H. S. wrote:
>>
>>
>>> However, I believe that the GUI that MS has given to the masses has
>>> played a very beneficial role in the GUI development in Unix/L
On Wed, 2004-12-15 at 14:45 -0500, H. S. wrote:
> Apparently, _Mason Loring Bliss_, on 15/12/04 14:30,typed:
> > On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 05:13:28PM -0500, H. S. wrote:
> >
[snip]
> computers in the 90's, MS based did. The ubiquitousness plus the ease of
> use made many new users realized that the
Apparently, _Mason Loring Bliss_, on 15/12/04 14:30,typed:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 05:13:28PM -0500, H. S. wrote:
However, I believe that the GUI that MS has given to the masses has
played a very beneficial role in the GUI development in Unix/Linux
world.
To credit Microsoft with this is unfort
On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 05:13:28PM -0500, H. S. wrote:
> However, I believe that the GUI that MS has given to the masses has
> played a very beneficial role in the GUI development in Unix/Linux
> world.
To credit Microsoft with this is unfortunate and incorrect.
Credit Apple with bringing the
User H. S. wrote::
Mateusz Łoskot wrote:
"Don't regret and use command line!!!" ;-)))
However, I believe that the GUI that MS has given to the masses has
played a very beneficial role in the GUI development in Unix/Linux
world.
Certainly, I agree.
Simply, I can not understand why Microsoft does
Mateusz Łoskot wrote:
User Micha Feigin wrote::
And if you are interested even Microsoft themselves don't use visual.
The whole
tool chain for windows is command line (I think it is proprietary
though).
Yeah, right, but Microsoft thinks that people/developers
are idiots and will use mouse-clicks
User Micha Feigin wrote::
And if you are interested even Microsoft themselves don't use visual. The
whole
tool chain for windows is command line (I think it is proprietary though).
Yeah, right, but Microsoft thinks that people/developers
are idiots and will use mouse-clicks as the best
computer us
On Thu, 2004-12-09 at 22:16 -0600, Eric Scott wrote:
> Micha Feigin wrote:
>
> >At Wed, 08 Dec 2004 07:17:17 -0600,
> >Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Kevin Mark wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 04:51:19PM +0800, ms linux wrote:
[snip]
> >
> >And if you are interested even Mi
Micha Feigin wrote:
At Wed, 08 Dec 2004 07:17:17 -0600,
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Kevin Mark wrote:
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 04:51:19PM +0800, ms linux wrote:
is there a free visual c++ equivalent in linux ?
searching so far I only found IBM XLC, but of course,
it's not free.
t
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 04:54:49PM +0200, Micha Feigin wrote:
> And if you are interested even Microsoft themselves don't use visual. The
> whole
> tool chain for windows is command line (I think it is proprietary though).
I worked there. They use the Microsoft C++ compiler, a whole bunch of
pe
inux ides?
> -- Fred
>
emacs with ecb and speedbar. Also integrates cvs/svn, diff, gdb, grep, shell
tags etc.
Probably vim also.
> On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 03:59:58 -0500, Kevin Mark
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 04:51:19PM +0800, ms linux wrote:
> >
At Wed, 08 Dec 2004 07:17:17 -0600,
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>
> Kevin Mark wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 04:51:19PM +0800, ms linux wrote:
> >
> >>is there a free visual c++ equivalent in linux ?
> >>searching so far I only found IBM XLC, but of course
On Wednesday 08 December 2004 17:21,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I use anjuta (www.anjuta.org). It generates and uses the standard
> autoconf makefile/configure setup. Or you can override that and manage
> the makefiles manually. It has an integrated debugger. It also
> integrates devhelp so you ge
Frederico Rodrigues Abraham wrote:
i'd like to see an IDE that allows me to use my makefiles to build my
applications and let me see the file tree pane... aswell as integrated
debugging
is there any way to do this with the linux ides?
-- Fred
I'm not sure what you mean about the file tree pane?
Kevin Mark wrote:
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 04:51:19PM +0800, ms linux wrote:
is there a free visual c++ equivalent in linux ?
searching so far I only found IBM XLC, but of course,
it's not free.
thanks,
--me--
Hi MS,
well there are 3 things that make up vc++ from my perspective:
a)c++ langu
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 10:53:45AM -0200, Frederico Rodrigues Abraham wrote:
> i'd like to see an IDE that allows me to use my makefiles to build my
> applications and let me see the file tree pane... aswell as integrated
> debugging
> is there any way to do this with the linux ides?
Vi Improved (
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 04:51:19PM +0800, ms linux wrote:
> > is there a free visual c++ equivalent in linux ?
> > searching so far I only found IBM XLC, but of course,
> > it's not free.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > --me--
> >
> Hi MS,
> well t
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 04:51:19PM +0800, ms linux wrote:
> is there a free visual c++ equivalent in linux ?
> searching so far I only found IBM XLC, but of course,
> it's not free.
>
> thanks,
>
> --me--
>
Hi MS,
well there are 3 things that make up vc++ from my
On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 16:51 +0800, ms linux wrote:
> is there a free visual c++ equivalent in linux ?
> searching so far I only found IBM XLC, but of course,
> it's not free.
>
> thanks,
>
> --me--
Anjuta
KDevelop
Eclipse
--
Eric Gaumer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
is there a free visual c++ equivalent in linux ?
searching so far I only found IBM XLC, but of course,
it's not free.
thanks,
--me--
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Download the latest ringtones, games, and more!
http://sg.mobile.yahoo.com
--
To UNSUBS
21 matches
Mail list logo
