You may be right, tcsh ain't exactly freshmeat's newest. But then again,
neither is vim. It certainly can't hurt trying.
On Thu, 8 Apr 1999, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 06, 1999 at 06:27:41PM -0600, John Galt wrote:
> > Try the HP-UX porting page--they have quite a few GNU-style progs
On Tue, Apr 06, 1999 at 06:27:41PM -0600, John Galt wrote:
> Try the HP-UX porting page--they have quite a few GNU-style progs ported
> to HP-UX: I remember getting the pages when I searched for "tcsh". HTH
I do remember visiting such a site a few months back (when I first
started working on HP-U
On Tue, Apr 06, 1999 at 11:40:56AM -0500, J.L.M. wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Apr 1999, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>
> > However, vim is not standard.
>
> I guess I would respond, "why not?"
>
> It's not unavailable, by any means. The fact that
> it isn't bundled with your OS should not be a problem
> after t
Try the HP-UX porting page--they have quite a few GNU-style progs ported
to HP-UX: I remember getting the pages when I searched for "tcsh". HTH
On Tue, 6 Apr 1999, E.L. Meijer (Eric) wrote:
> >
> > However, vim is not standard. I routinely work on HP-UX these days
> > and doubt that vim is ins
E.L. Meijer Eric" hat gesagt: // E.L. Meijer Eric" wrote:
> >
> > However, vim is not standard. I routinely work on HP-UX these days
> > and doubt that vim is installed there, for example.
>
> It usually is not too hard to go to a debian site, download the original
> source tarbal, and compile i
On Wed, 7 Apr 1999, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> However, vim is not standard.
I guess I would respond, "why not?"
It's not unavailable, by any means. The fact that
it isn't bundled with your OS should not be a problem
after the first day of operation.
--
James
http://ssdd.conservatory.com
>
> However, vim is not standard. I routinely work on HP-UX these days
> and doubt that vim is installed there, for example.
It usually is not too hard to go to a debian site, download the original
source tarbal, and compile it for personal use. I just did that with
procmail on SGI.
HTH,
Eric
On Sun, Apr 04, 1999 at 05:37:06PM +1000, Tyson Dowd wrote:
> Major Advantages to using vim over nvi:
> - multiple undo
> - region select
> - recordable macros
> - :command history
> - filename completion
> - multiple buffers/split windows
> - identifier c
/usr/bin/vi should alwasy point to /etc/alternatives/vi
you can modify the link to make /etc/alternatives/vi points to
/usr/bin/vim
then your vi should fire up vim.
Shao Zhang - Running Debian 2.1 ___ _
On 04-Apr-1999, Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 03, 1999 at 06:18:57PM -, Pollywog wrote:
> > vi is acting weird, and I just discovered that vi on my system is not really
> > vim. Isn't vi really just a symlink to vim on most systems?
> >
> > vim works well, but vi is
On Sat, Apr 03, 1999 at 06:18:57PM -, Pollywog wrote:
> vi is acting weird, and I just discovered that vi on my system is not really
> vim. Isn't vi really just a symlink to vim on most systems?
>
> vim works well, but vi is weird. It acts buggy.
vi could be nvi, elvis, or vim, or another
Pollywog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Pollywog> vi is acting weird, and I just discovered that vi on my
Pollywog> system is not really vim. Isn't vi really just a symlink to
Pollywog> vim on most systems?
On "most" Unix systems (including the Suns and SGIs I use on a routine
basis) 'vi' is a pre
On 03-Apr-99 thomas lakofski wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Apr 1999, Pollywog wrote:
>
>> vi is acting weird, and I just discovered that vi on my system is not
>> really
>> vim. Isn't vi really just a symlink to vim on most systems?
>>
>> vim works well, but vi is weird. It acts buggy.
>
> /usr/bin/vi
On Sat, 3 Apr 1999, Pollywog wrote:
> vi is acting weird, and I just discovered that vi on my system is not really
> vim. Isn't vi really just a symlink to vim on most systems?
>
> vim works well, but vi is weird. It acts buggy.
/usr/bin/vi is linked to /etc/alternatives/vi; take a look at wh
vi is acting weird, and I just discovered that vi on my system is not really
vim. Isn't vi really just a symlink to vim on most systems?
vim works well, but vi is weird. It acts buggy.
thanks
--
Andrew
[PGP5.0 Key ID 0x5EE61C37]
15 matches
Mail list logo
