Hi Sven,
On Sat, Oct 07, 2023 at 09:09:27AM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2023-10-06 22:32 +, Andy Smith wrote:
> > It got done years ago in Ubuntu, and their dpkg doesn't have this
> > issue, as they've carried patches for that for all those years.
>
> Ubuntu may have patched out the dpkg
On 2023-10-06 22:32 +, Andy Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 04:42:56PM +0200, Urs Thuermann wrote:
>> Greg Wooledge writes:
>>
>> > Yeah, usrmerge is a bit wonky in these early stages.
>>
>> $ apt-get changelog usrmerge | tail -n2
>> -- Marco d'Itri Tue, 04 Nov 2014 22:42:44
Hello,
On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 04:42:56PM +0200, Urs Thuermann wrote:
> Greg Wooledge writes:
>
> > Yeah, usrmerge is a bit wonky in these early stages.
>
> $ apt-get changelog usrmerge | tail -n2
> -- Marco d'Itri Tue, 04 Nov 2014 22:42:44 +0100
> Fetched 11.0 kB in 0s (58.9 k
Greg Wooledge writes:
> Yeah, usrmerge is a bit wonky in these early stages.
$ apt-get changelog usrmerge | tail -n2
-- Marco d'Itri Tue, 04 Nov 2014 22:42:44 +0100
Fetched 11.0 kB in 0s (58.9 kB/s)
Not what I'd call 'early' stages.
> Part of the reason for this is that it's n
Marco writes:
> Am 06.10.2023 schrieb Steve Keller :
>
> > I have always been sceptical about /usr merge, since all binaries now
> > appear in two places, "type sh" in bash gives the strange looking
> > /usr/bin/sh where all Uni*ers are strongly used to /bin/sh. But also
> > things like the fol
On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 11:06:56AM +0200, Steve Keller wrote:
> $ dpkg -S $(type -p sh)
> dpkg-query: no path found matching pattern /usr/bin/sh
>
> And I don't see a comfortable way around this.
Yeah, usrmerge is a bit wonky in these early stages. Part of the reason
for this is that it'
Am 06.10.2023 schrieb Steve Keller :
> I have upgraded from bullseye to bookworm and it seems the package
> usrmerge is installed forcedly now. At least it has been installed
> and I haven't been asked about it :-(
>
> I have always been sceptical about /usr merge, since all binaries now
> appea
I have upgraded from bullseye to bookworm and it seems the package usrmerge is
installed forcedly now. At least it has been installed and I haven't been
asked about it :-(
I have always been sceptical about /usr merge, since all binaries now appear in
two places, "type sh" in bash gives the st
8 matches
Mail list logo
