Am 2006-12-09 18:07:15, schrieb Micha Feigin:
> That is what I'm afraid of at the moment, the help file implies that I need an
> account for each procmail spool, which sounds rather against the whole idea of
> procmail and fetchmail. I was wondering if there is a way around that.
First: apt-get i
On Friday 08 December 2006 22:05, Micha Feigin wrote:
> I couldn't find anything about this in google.
>
> I currently have a working setup I like that uses fetchmail and procmail. I
> thought of moving to kmail since it can do a few things that annoy me with
> sylpheed. Is it possible to use kmail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/08/06 14:05, Micha Feigin wrote:
> I couldn't find anything about this in google.
>
> I currently have a working setup I like that uses fetchmail and procmail. I
> thought of moving to kmail since it can do a few things that annoy me with
> sylp
On Fri, 08 Dec 2006 18:21:27 -0800
John L Fjellstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I couldn't find anything about this in google.
> >
> > I currently have a working setup I like that uses fetchmail and procmail. I
> > thought of moving to kmail since i
Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I couldn't find anything about this in google.
>
> I currently have a working setup I like that uses fetchmail and procmail. I
> thought of moving to kmail since it can do a few things that annoy me with
> sylpheed. Is it possible to use kmail with a loca
I couldn't find anything about this in google.
I currently have a working setup I like that uses fetchmail and procmail. I
thought of moving to kmail since it can do a few things that annoy me with
sylpheed. Is it possible to use kmail with a local maildir folder that is
handled be procmail and fe
6 matches
Mail list logo