On 01.03.2010 16:59, Mart Frauenlob wrote:
> On 01.03.2010 12:06, Mart Frauenlob wrote:
>> On 28.02.2010 09:29, Mart Frauenlob wrote:
>
>>> after I upgraded from etch to lenny a few days ago (new config files
>>> have been installed for vim), I noticed that syntax highlighting for my
>>> bash scri
On 01.03.2010 16:32, Mart Frauenlob wrote:
> On 01.03.2010 14:56, Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
>> Check `update-alternatives --list vim` to ensure your not running vim-tiny.
>>
> eris:~# update-alternatives --display vim
> vim - status is auto.
> link currently points to /usr/bin/vim.basic
> /usr/bin/v
On 01.03.2010 12:06, Mart Frauenlob wrote:
> On 28.02.2010 09:29, Mart Frauenlob wrote:
>> after I upgraded from etch to lenny a few days ago (new config files
>> have been installed for vim), I noticed that syntax highlighting for my
>> bash scripts is not working as before.
>>
>> There are some
On 01.03.2010 14:56, Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
> Check `update-alternatives --list vim` to ensure your not running vim-tiny.
>
eris:~# update-alternatives --display vim
vim - status is auto.
link currently points to /usr/bin/vim.basic
/usr/bin/vim.tiny - priority 10
/usr/bin/vim.basic - priority 30
Check `update-alternatives --list vim` to ensure your not running vim-tiny.
--
Jordan Metzmeier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/50e5edd51003010556p1
On 28.02.2010 09:29, Mart Frauenlob wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> after I upgraded from etch to lenny a few days ago (new config files
> have been installed for vim), I noticed that syntax highlighting for my
> bash scripts is not working as before.
>
> There are some things i've noticed, where of the f
Hello,
after I upgraded from etch to lenny a few days ago (new config files
have been installed for vim), I noticed that syntax highlighting for my
bash scripts is not working as before.
There are some things i've noticed, where of the first is worse to me.
1: If I put the following statement o
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009, Niu Kun wrote:
> Robert P. J. Day 写道:
> > i finally pulled the trigger on this, almost 300 packages upgraded,
> > rebooted and here are some of the (apparently non-fatal) issues i ran
> > across:
... snip ...
> > 3) in fact, running "aptitude upgrade" tells me that slapd i
Robert P. J. Day 写道:
i finally pulled the trigger on this, almost 300 packages upgraded,
rebooted and here are some of the (apparently non-fatal) issues i ran
across:
1) my /etc/aliases.db file was deleted. no problem, i just recreated
it with
# postalias hash:/etc/aliases
easy enough t
i finally pulled the trigger on this, almost 300 packages upgraded,
rebooted and here are some of the (apparently non-fatal) issues i ran
across:
1) my /etc/aliases.db file was deleted. no problem, i just recreated
it with
# postalias hash:/etc/aliases
easy enough to fix but should i hav
On 26 Mrz., 16:10, Michael Lange wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:41:26 +0200
>
Ok, there seems to be a bug in debian's initramfs-tools that resembles
a lot the one described at
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=507721
.
In the last few days I learned how to unpack, edit and re-pa
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:41:26 +0200
Γιώργος Πάλλας wrote:
> klappnase wrote:
> > Hello,
> > after I upgraded to lenny I am not able to boot the new kernel
> > (2.6.26-1-686), however it still works using the old etch kernel
> > (2.6.22-2-k7 from backports.org). About my system: There is an
> > enc
klappnase wrote:
Hello,
after I upgraded to lenny I am not able to boot the new kernel
(2.6.26-1-686), however it still works using the old etch kernel
(2.6.22-2-k7 from backports.org). About my system: There is an
encrypted root partition on /dev/hda1 and a separate /boot partition
on /dev/hda4.
Hello,
after I upgraded to lenny I am not able to boot the new kernel
(2.6.26-1-686), however it still works using the old etch kernel
(2.6.22-2-k7 from backports.org). About my system: There is an
encrypted root partition on /dev/hda1 and a separate /boot partition
on /dev/hda4. When booting the n
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 06:56:25PM +0100, hh...@gmx.de wrote:
> > Hello Debian users,
> >
> > I have a virtual private server (VPS) that is running a minimal install
> > of
> > etch (image used for installation provided by the hosting company
On Monday 09 March 2009 12:56:25 hh...@gmx.de wrote:
> Hello Debian users,
>
> I have a virtual private server (VPS) that is running a minimal
> install of
> etch (image used for installation provided by the hosting
company). I
> believe they use Virtuozzo for virtualisation. Since the virtual
> s
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 06:56:25PM +0100, hh...@gmx.de wrote:
> Hello Debian users,
>
> I have a virtual private server (VPS) that is running a minimal install
> of
> etch (image used for installation provided by the hosting company). I
> believe they use Virtuozzo for virtualisation. Since the vi
Hello Debian users,
I have a virtual private server (VPS) that is running a minimal
install of
etch (image used for installation provided by the hosting company). I
believe they use Virtuozzo for virtualisation. Since the virtual
servers are
not run using Xen, this means I am bound by the k
Francesco, in order to move to 4.0 you just have to make sure your
/etc/apt/sources.list points to stable or etch which is current stable
release (a symbolic link to).
This is a line of mine
deb http://debian.fastweb.it/debian/ stable main contrib
You can also run
netselect-apt stable
it will fe
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 12:00:16PM +0100, Liam O'Toole wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 02:50:18 -0700 (PDT)
> Francesco Pietra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm using i386 and amd64 etch. Now want to move to 4.0
> > etch,
>
> Please be aware that etch *is* version 4.0. Could you please verify
> wha
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 02:50:18 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Francesco Pietra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: upgrade etch
> To: debian-users
>
> Hope those who know will not be hurt by these naive
> questions in face of the extensive instructions on
>
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 02:50:18 -0700 (PDT)
Francesco Pietra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hope those who know will not be hurt by these naive
> questions in face of the extensive instructions on
> Debian website.
I'm sure they won't be :-)
>
> I'm using i386 and amd64 etch. Now want to move to 4.0
Hope those who know will not be hurt by these naive
questions in face of the extensive instructions on
Debian website.
I'm using i386 and amd64 etch. Now want to move to 4.0
etch, though I can't do that immediately because the
amd64 machine is computing, while the i386 machine is
ssh linked to the
23 matches
Mail list logo
