I saw your post about the Ricochet modem - you put me on the right
track, and the good news is that I've been in contact with the guys on
the linux-usb-devel list. I've suspected for a long time that the
Ricochet modem is buggy hardware, and now we've got proof... it turns
out that it's flagra
Eric wrote:
> I'm at a bit of a loss here and looking for recommendations.
Well, not so much solved as worked around.
I upgraded the kernel from 2.6.8 to 2.6.9 --> didn't work
I installed udev thinking it might solve the issue --> didn't work, but as
an unexpected bonus I figured out how to g
I'm at a bit of a loss here and looking for recommendations.
A few days back I did a dist-upgrade (2.6.7 --> 2.6.8-1) on SID and now I
can't get my modem to work. I use the wireless Ricochet service with a USB
Metricom modem. Currently /dev/modem is symlinked to /dev/ttyACM0, which
worked just fin
Uwe Dippel wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 14:50:05 +0200, Uwe Dippel wrote:
On Thu, 08 Apr 2004 12:30:17 +0200, Sebastiaan wrote:
Coming to libxrender-dev: seems libxrender1 depends on a lower version
than installed. You can try to manually download libxrender-dev
version 0.8.3-5 and careful
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 14:50:05 +0200, Uwe Dippel wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Apr 2004 12:30:17 +0200, Sebastiaan wrote:
>
>> Coming to libxrender-dev: seems libxrender1 depends on a lower version
>> than installed. You can try to manually download libxrender-dev
>> version 0.8.3-5 and carefully dpkg --forc
On Thu, 08 Apr 2004 12:30:17 +0200, Sebastiaan wrote:
> Coming to libxrender-dev: seems libxrender1 depends on a lower version
> than installed. You can try to manually download libxrender-dev
> version 0.8.3-5 and carefully dpkg --force downgrade --install it (not to
> mess up the rest of the pac
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 05:56:16PM +0800, Uwe Dippel wrote:
| On Thu, 08 Apr 2004 11:30:17 +0200, Sebastiaan wrote:
|
| > a apt-get dist-upgrade is usually recommended since it also
| > installs/removes packages when the distribution changes. Try that first,
| > see if the problem remains.
|
| #
Uwe Dippel wrote:
On Thu, 08 Apr 2004 11:30:17 +0200, Sebastiaan wrote:
a apt-get dist-upgrade is usually recommended since it also
installs/removes packages when the distribution changes. Try that first,
see if the problem remains.
# apt-get dist-upgrade
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building
Hi,
On Thu, 8 Apr 2004, Uwe Dippel wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Apr 2004 11:30:17 +0200, Sebastiaan wrote:
>
> > a apt-get dist-upgrade is usually recommended since it also
> > installs/removes packages when the distribution changes. Try that first,
> > see if the problem remains.
>
> # apt-get dist-upgra
On Thu, 08 Apr 2004 11:30:17 +0200, Sebastiaan wrote:
> a apt-get dist-upgrade is usually recommended since it also
> installs/removes packages when the distribution changes. Try that first,
> see if the problem remains.
# apt-get dist-upgrade
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tre
Hi,
On Thu, 8 Apr 2004, Uwe Dippel wrote:
> I searched the archives and Google, without success.
> The subject says it. I automatically do a daily
> apt-get update
> apt-get upgrade
>
a apt-get dist-upgrade is usually recommended since it also
installs/removes packages when the distribution chang
I searched the archives and Google, without success.
The subject says it. I automatically do a daily
apt-get update
apt-get upgrade
Some 10 to 14 days back there was a problem coming in:
# apt-get upgrade
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
You might want to run `apt-g
Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I run apt-get update&&apt-get upgrade frequently. Seems a recently
> installed package is broken (I'm suspecting fileutils).
>
> When I do an ls I get:
> ls: reading directory .: Function not implemented
>
> When I do an apt-get upgrade I get:
> 27 packages upg
Chris said:
> The fine folks on #debian at irc.openprojects.net suggested a problem
> between libc6 2.3.1-6 and a 2.2 kernel, though I've not yet found how to
> fix it with apt-get broken.
>
> I do not believe that I am running sid. I believe that it is the testing
> release, though I am not ce
On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 02:40:36PM -0600, Chris wrote:
> When I do an ls I get:
> ls: reading directory .: Function not implemented
[...]
> The fine folks on #debian at irc.openprojects.net suggested a problem
> between libc6 2.3.1-6 and a 2.2 kernel,
The fine folks on #debian are absolutely corr
Greetings:
I run apt-get update&&apt-get upgrade frequently. Seems a recently
installed package is broken (I'm suspecting fileutils).
When I do an ls I get:
ls: reading directory .: Function not implemented
When I do an apt-get upgrade I get:
27 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove
said Holger Mense, on Feb 2,
> On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Geordie Birch wrote:
>
> >
> > apt-get dist-upgrade from woody to sid has left my system with a bunch of
> > packages that are broken and unremoveable; no combination of apt-get -f
> [...]
> > # apt-get -fuy dist-upgrade
> [...]
> > Preparing to
apt-get dist-upgrade from woody to sid has left my system with a bunch of
packages that are broken and unremoveable; no combination of apt-get -f
install, apt-get -f dist-upgrade, dpkg --configure -a, dpkg -P [broken
packages], apt-get remove [broken packages] has sorted it out.
(please cc [EMAIL
Quoting Chris Mason ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I am using CorelLinux 1.0 and I tried using dselect to upgrade to unstable.
> After all the packages were downloaded, and install started, there were a
> lot fo errors somehting like "such and such is not owned by root".
> I rebooted and not I get a login
I am using CorelLinux 1.0 and I tried using dselect to upgrade to unstable.
After all the packages were downloaded, and install started, there were a
lot fo errors somehting like "such and such is not owned by root".
I rebooted and not I get a login prompt but no password prmopt. I can't ssh
into t
On Sat, Jan 23, 1999 at 04:06:02PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What's wrong and how can I fix it? I have sources.lists pointing to
> slink.
A blooper of mine. 0.20.3-3 fixed this. It's on it's way to mirrors (it's
already installed on the main archive)
On Sat, Jan 23, 1999 at 04:06:02PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Had same problem,
than I get wmaker from potato, it works but uses libwraster too,
--
Peter Berlau
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, folks
Any ideas as to what's up with this:
debian:/home/jesse# apt-get dist-upgrade
Updating package status cache...done
Checking system integrity...ok
1 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
1 packages not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 0b/83
23 matches
Mail list logo
