unzip license changed from potato to woody. That's why it is in non-free
in potato and in non-US/main in woody.
BTW: The version in woody (for i386) supports encryption and works ok
under potato because it was compiled under potato (i.e. no need to use
glibc-2.2).
On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, Chris Gray wrote:
> I knew I had seen a better copyright somewhere:
>
> --
> Latest Release
>
> New features in UnZip 5.41, released 16 April 2000:
>
>
> new BSD-like license
>
Yeah, that's why zip is in main. Unzip, however, st
> "kmself" == kmself writes:
kmself> on Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 04:52:51PM -0500, Chris Gray
kmself> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> > "Carel" == Carel Fellinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Carel> unzip is not truly free, so it ain't part of Debian pure.
Carel> Try
on Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 04:52:51PM -0500, Chris Gray ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > "Carel" == Carel Fellinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Carel> unzip is not truly free, so it ain't part of Debian pure.
> Carel> Try adding non-free to your default deb line in your
> Carel> /et
> "Carel" == Carel Fellinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Carel> unzip is not truly free, so it ain't part of Debian pure.
Carel> Try adding non-free to your default deb line in your
Carel> /etc/apt/sources.list:
This is strange to me. I've seen the unzip licence, and it looks lik
On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 02:28:51PM -, Alistair Whittle wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Using 'apt-get install zip' worked like a charm to install the zip package.
> However, using the 'unzip' variant, the following error occurred: "Package
> unzip has no available version, but exists in the database. This
Chewie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 02:28:51PM -, Alistair Whittle wrote:
>> Using 'apt-get install zip' worked like a charm to install the zip package.
>> However, using the 'unzip' variant, the following error occurred: "Package
>> unzip has no available version, but ex
On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 02:28:51PM -, Alistair Whittle wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Using 'apt-get install zip' worked like a charm to install the zip package.
> However, using the 'unzip' variant, the following error occurred: "Package
> unzip has no available version, but exists in the database. This
On Thursday 30 November 2000 08:28, Alistair Whittle wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Using 'apt-get install zip' worked like a charm to install the zip package.
> However, using the 'unzip' variant, the following error occurred: "Package
> unzip has no available version, but exists in the database. This
> typic
Hi,
Using 'apt-get install zip' worked like a charm to install the zip package.
However, using the 'unzip' variant, the following error occurred: "Package
unzip has no available version, but exists in the database. This typically
means that the package was mentioned in a dependancy, but was neve
10 matches
Mail list logo