Re: trivial egcc question...

1999-10-01 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 10:01:24AM -0400, Jonathan Lupa wrote: > I agree that makefiles are the way to go, but I often like to > prototype unfamilliar language features before I use them in > production code. I guess I'm still screwed if I need to specify > unweildly include paths or such since a

Re: trivial egcc question...

1999-10-01 Thread Jonathan Lupa
On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 03:04:56AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > The command "g++" (also known as "c++") exists to do exactly this job - Thanks! This is what I was looking for. For whatever reason, I was still laboring under the misconception that egcs and g++ were not one and the same. I agree tha

Re: trivial egcc question...

1999-10-01 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, Sep 29, 1999 at 05:29:00PM -0400, Jonathan Lupa wrote: > Is there a way to set an environment variable with the args I want for the > egcc line? The traditional approach is to use a Makefile. However... > For example, I like STL, and am always typing `egcc -Wall -lstdc++ foo.cpp`. > It

Re: trivial egcc question...

1999-09-30 Thread Ian Zimmerman
> "Jonathan" == Jonathan Lupa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jonathan> This is more of a egcc question than a Debian question, but Jonathan> after looking through the man page, I didn't find an answer Jonathan> so here we go... When dealing with GNU software, info is usually a better source than

trivial egcc question...

1999-09-30 Thread Jonathan Lupa
This is more of a egcc question than a Debian question, but after looking through the man page, I didn't find an answer so here we go... Is there a way to set an environment variable with the args I want for the egcc line? For example, I like STL, and am always typing `egcc -Wall -lstdc++ foo.cpp