Re: OT: time and computer networks

2004-12-05 Thread Matt Price
Thanks to everyone who responded, I appreciate the help! Thx especially to Alex, I feel I understand wha I needed to a little better. m -- .''`. Matt Price : :' : Debian User `. `'` & hemi-geek `- -- if you're an evil spa

Re: OT: time and computer networks

2004-12-02 Thread Paul E Condon
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 12:59:57AM -0500, Matt Price wrote: > hi folks, > > ok... this is way OT. but I thought I'd put this question to the > most knowledgable group of people I know... > > I have to give a lecture on the history of timekeeping technologies. > I want to end with late c.20/ ear

Re: OT: time and computer networks

2004-12-02 Thread Mark Roach
On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 00:59 -0500, Matt Price wrote: > puttingthe lecture together I realized I don'trelaly understand why > it's important for computer networks to have fine-grain > synchronization. So I thought I'd ask some geeks (as my sig says, I'm > only a hemi-geek): why does a network nee

Re: OT: time and computer networks

2004-12-02 Thread Michael Marsh
On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 08:56:44 -0600, Alex Malinovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Modern timekeeping systems have primarily been put in place for the > benefit of the humans using the computers, not so much the computers > themselves. The reason that things like NTP are so accurate is not > because

Re: time and computer networks

2004-12-02 Thread John Hasler
Icebiker writes: > If clocks are wildly out of sync, some software ... will hiccup on the > time warps. Make, for example. -- John Hasler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: OT: time and computer networks

2004-12-02 Thread Alex Malinovich
On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 00:59 -0500, Matt Price wrote: > hi folks, > > ok... this is way OT. but I thought I'd put this question to the > most knowledgable group of people I know... > > I have to give a lecture on the history of timekeeping technologies. > I want to end with late c.20/ early c21

Re: time and computer networks

2004-12-02 Thread Icebiker
ile) feeds. Although such systems may not be "real time", a 5 minute time warp can make for funny reports. /icebiker - Original Message - From: "Matt Price" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "debian users" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 02, 200

RE: OT: time and computer networks

2004-12-02 Thread Croy, Nathan
> From: Ron Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 1:14 AM > > On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 00:59 -0500, Matt Price wrote: > > hi folks, > > > > only a hemi-geek): why does a network need careful clock > > synchronization? > > It's applications & humans that need/want c

Re: OT: time and computer networks

2004-12-01 Thread Ron Johnson
On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 00:59 -0500, Matt Price wrote: > hi folks, > > ok... this is way OT. but I thought I'd put this question to the > most knowledgable group of people I know... > > I have to give a lecture on the history of timekeeping technologies. > I want to end with late c.20/ early c21

OT: time and computer networks

2004-12-01 Thread Matt Price
hi folks, ok... this is way OT. but I thought I'd put this question to the most knowledgable group of people I know... I have to give a lecture on the history of timekeeping technologies. I want to end with late c.20/ early c21 technologies of synchronized timekeeping. GPS is one obvious examp