Re: tiger reports `-' listening on socket

2006-06-24 Thread Bill Jones
On 6/23/06, Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: clearly there is something going on here that I don't understand. Set a cron for the 'root' user: 1 * * * * lsof -i Unless the culprit is dying randomly that should catch something -- WC (Bill) Jones -- http://youve-reached-the.endo

Re: tiger reports `-' listening on socket

2006-06-23 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 10:53:46PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 03:39:37PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > > Has anyone else seen this? > > > > in the last few days tiger has started reporting: > > > > OLD: --WARN-- [lin002i] The process `-' is listening on soc

Re: tiger reports `-' listening on socket

2006-06-23 Thread hendrik
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 03:39:37PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > Has anyone else seen this? > > in the last few days tiger has started reporting: > > OLD: --WARN-- [lin002i] The process `-' is listening on socket 1661 > (TCP) on > +every interface. > NEW: --WARN-- [lin002i] The process `

tiger reports `-' listening on socket

2006-06-23 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
Has anyone else seen this? in the last few days tiger has started reporting: OLD: --WARN-- [lin002i] The process `-' is listening on socket 1661 (TCP) on +every interface. NEW: --WARN-- [lin002i] The process `-' is listening on socket 2309 (TCP) on +every interface. but a lsof -i :1661 or :2309

Tiger reports suspicious file - now what?

2005-10-08 Thread Anthony Campbell
I just installed tiger. One of the logfiles (check_rootkit.out.1) says: # Performing check for rookits... # Running chkrootkit (/usr/sbin/chkrootkit) to perform further checks... --ALERT-- [rootkit005a] Chkrootkit has found a file which seems to be infected because of a rootkit --ALERT-- [root

Tiger reports possible Slapper worm, but chkrootkit disagrees.

2004-01-30 Thread Carl Fink
I have Tiger Audit set up on my Sarge system. My last two reports say this: # Running chkrootkit (/usr/sbin/chkrootkit) to perform further checks... OLD: --WARN-- [rootkit004f] Chkrootkit has detected a possible rootkit installation OLD: Warning: Possible Slapper Worm installed However, when I r

Re: tiger reports

2001-09-22 Thread David Roundy
On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 10:33:04AM -0700, Craig Dickson wrote: > > > It can potentially make superuser access easier to crack unless both > > accounts have strong passwords. More generally, I suspect that this > > is flagged because it could indicate that your system has been > > compromised and

Re: tiger reports

2001-09-22 Thread Joey Hess
Craig Dickson wrote: > I found a discussion in debian-devel for June 2000 that was mildly > informative. There was a proposal then to add information about the > standard uids to /usr/share/doc/base-passwd/README, but this does > not seem to have happened. We had a thread just last month about the

Re: tiger reports

2001-09-21 Thread Craig Dickson
Hall Stevenson wrote: > Check the archives of this list for a discussion of this topic > from about 2-3 months ago (not sure of the date really > though...). One of the package maintainers brought this up and > it turned into quite an active thread as I recall. I couldn't find anything in debian-

Re: tiger reports

2001-09-21 Thread Stig Brautaset
* Craig Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake thus: > Dave Sherohman wrote: > > > > How can anonymous FTP be enabled when I have no FTP server installed? > > > > Is a config file present in /etc? > > What would it be called? There are no files matching the glob "/etc/ftp*". try /etc/*ftp* I have /

Re: tiger reports

2001-09-21 Thread Hall Stevenson
> So should I set the shell to /bin/false for all accounts > that shouldn't allow a tty or console login? That would > include postgres, mail, www-data, daemon, bin, sys, > man, games, lp, uucp, backup, operator, nobody... > For that matter, can some of these be safely deleted? Check the archive

Re: tiger reports

2001-09-21 Thread Craig Dickson
Dave Sherohman wrote: > > How can anonymous FTP be enabled when I have no FTP server installed? > > Is a config file present in /etc? What would it be called? There are no files matching the glob "/etc/ftp*". > It can potentially make superuser access easier to crack unless both > accounts have

Re: tiger reports

2001-09-21 Thread Dave Sherohman
On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 10:05:20AM -0700, Craig Dickson wrote: > If /etc/fstab is not world-readable, will users still be able to mount > things? Without having to supply all the details of what to mount where, > using what filesystem? Users can't mount things by supplying all details of from wher

tiger reports

2001-09-21 Thread Craig Dickson
Is anyone else using the 'tiger' security-checking tool? Mine is giving me some reports that I'm not sure how to deal with. Here they are: # Performing check of system file permissions... --FAIL-- [perm007f] /etc/aliases should not have group read. --WARN-- [perm003w] /etc/fstab should not h